Abstract
Depictive expressions of thought predate written language by thousands of years. They have evolved in communities through a kind of informal user testing that has refined them. Analyzing common visual communications reveals consistencies that illuminate how people think as well as guide design; the process can be brought into the laboratory and accelerated. Like language, visual communications abstract and schematize; unlike language, they use properties of the page (e.g., proximity and place: center, horizontal/up-down, vertical/left-right) and the marks on it (e.g., dots, lines, arrows, boxes, blobs, likenesses, symbols) to convey meanings. The visual expressions of these meanings (e.g., individual, category, order, relation, correspondence, continuum, hierarchy) have analogs in language, gesture, and especially in the patterns that are created when people design the world around them, arranging things into piles and rows and hierarchies and arrays, spatial-abstraction-action interconnections termed spractions. The designed world is a diagram.
This paper is reprinted with permission from Topics in Cognitive Science, 2011,3, 499–535.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agrawala, M., & Stolte, C. (2001). Rendering effective route maps: Improving usability through generalization. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001 (pp. 241–250). New York: ACM.
Ainsworth, S. (2008a). How do animations influence learning? In D. H. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 37–67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Ainsworth, S. (2008b). How should we evaluate multimedia learning environments?. In J.-F. Rouet, R. Lowe, & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Understanding multimedia comprehension. New York: Springer.
Alperson-Afil, N., Sharon, G., Kislev, M., Melamed, Y., Zohar, I., Ashkenazi, S., Rabinovich, R., Biton, R., Werker, E., Hartman, G., Feibel, C., & Goren-Inbar, N. (2009). Spatial organization of hominin activities at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel. Science, 326, 1677–1680.
Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication. London: Routledge.
Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Arnheim, R. (1977). The dynamics of architectural form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Arnheim, R. (1988). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Barker, R. G. (1963). The stream of behavior as an empirical problem. In R. G. Barker (Ed.), The stream of behavior (pp. 1–22). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Barker, R. G., & Wright, H. F. (1954). Midwest and its children: The psychological ecology of an American town. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.
Bendix, F., Kosara, R., & Hauser, H. (2006). Parallel sets: Interactive exploration and visual analysis of categori- cal data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 558–568.
Bertin, J. (1981). Graphics and graphic-information-processing. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.
Brown, L. (1979). The story of maps. New York: Dover.
Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition—A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257–269.
Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75–100.
Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351–367.
Chatterjee, A. (2001). Language and space: Some interactions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 55–61.
Chatterjee, A. (2002). Portrait profiles and the notion of agency. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 33–41.
Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (2000). Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 45–49.
Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (2002). The influence of handedness on profile and line drawing directionality in children, young, and older normal adults. Brain, Cognition, and Emotion, 48, 333–336.
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Committee on Support for Thinking Spatially. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Cooper, W. E., & Ross, J. R. (1975). World order. In R. E. Grossman, L. J. San, & T. J. Vance (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism (pp. 63–111). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Corter, J. E., Rho, Y.-J., Zahner, D., Nickerson, J. V., & Tversky, B. (2009). Bugs and biases: Diagnosing misconceptions in the understanding of diagrams. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ.
De Loache, J. S. (2004). Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 66–70.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, PA: Learning Services.
Elkin, J. (1999). The domain of images. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Journal of Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 157–180.
Engle, R. A. (1998). Not channels but composite signals: Speech, gesture, diagrams and object demonstrations are integrated in multimodal explanations. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fontana, D. (2005). Meditating with mandalas. London: Duncan Baird Publishers.
Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence rom Piraha ̃ language and cognition. Cognition, 108, 819–824.
Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76.
Gattis, M. (2002). Structure mapping in spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 17, 1157–1183.
Gattis, M. (2004). Mapping relational structure in spatial reasoning. Cognitive Science, 28 (4), 589–610.
Gattis, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1–9.
Gelb, I. (1963). A study of writing, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gelman, R., & Gallistel, R. (1986). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Gobert, J. D. (1999). Expertise in the comprehension of architectural plans. In J. Gero & B. Tversky (Eds.),Visual and spatial reasoning in design (pp. 185–205). Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gombrich, E. (1961). Art and illusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gombrich, E. (1979). The sense of order: A study in the psychology of decorative art. Oxford, England: Phaidon.
Goodman, N. (1978). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. New York: Bobbs-Merrill
Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words. Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496–499.
Hartshorne, C., & Weiss, P. (Eds.) (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1084–1102.
Hegarty, M. (2010). Components of spatial intelligence. In B. H. Ross (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 52. Pp. 265–297. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 325–360.
Hegarty, P., Lemieux, A. F., & McQueen, G. (2010). Graphing the order of the sexes: Constructing, recalling, interpreting, and putting the self in gender difference graphs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 375–391.
Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2006). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.),Handbook of visuospatial thinking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Heiser, J., & Tversky, B. (2006). Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams. Cognitive Science, 30, 581–592.
Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1962). Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: A study of one child’s performance. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 624–628.
Hochberg, J., & Galper, R. E. (1967). Recognition of faces: I. An exploratory study. Psychonomic Science, 6, 156–163.
Horn, R. E. (1998). Visual language. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVu, Inc.
Howard, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley.
Hughes, M. (1986). Children and number: Difficulties in learning mathematics. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Inselberg, A., & Dimsdale, B. (1990). Parallel coordinates: A tool for visualizing multi-dimensional geometry, Visualization ‘90. Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Visualizations, 23–26, 361–378.
Ittelson, W. H. (1996). Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 171–187.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Micro-and macro-developmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 91–118.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraints on representational change: Evidence from children’s drawing. Cognition, 34, 1–27.
Kellogg, R. (1969). Analyzing children’s art. Palo Alto, CA: National Press.
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Kessell, A. M., & Tversky, B. (2006). Using gestures and diagrams to think and talk about insight problems. Proceedings of the Meetings of the Cognitive Science Society.
Kessell, A. M., & Tversky, B. (2008). Cognitive methods for visualizing space, time, and agents. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Kessell, A. M., & Tversky, B. (2009). Thinking about cycles: Producing sequences but preferring circles.
Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 185–223.
Kosslyn, S. M. (2006). Graph design for the eye and the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33, 710–726.
Kulvicki, J. (2006). Pictorial representation. Philosophy Compass, 10, 1–12.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.
Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007a). Formal notations are diagrams: Evidence from a production task. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2033–2040.
Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007b). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 720–733.
Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.
Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). The development of external symbol systems: The child as a notator. In R. Gelman & T. Kit Fong Au (Eds.), Perceptual and cognitive develoment (pp. 185–211). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lee, P. U., & Tversky, B. (2005). Interplay between visual and spatial: The effects of landmark descriptions on comprehension of route⁄survey descriptions. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5 (2 & 3), 163–185.
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Maass, A., Pagani, D., & Berta, E. (2007). How beautiful is the goal and how violent is the fistfight? Spatial bias in the interpretation of human behavior Social Cognition, 25, 833–852.
Maass, A., & Russo, A. (2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture? Psychological Science, 14, 296–301.
Mallery, G. (1893⁄1972). Picture writing of the American Indians. (Originally published by Government Printing Office). New York: Dover.
Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S. Y., & Campbell, J. (2005). When passive media promote active learning: Static diagrams versus animation in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 256–265.
McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics. New York: Harper Collins.
McManus, I. C., & Humphrey, N. (1973). Turning the left cheek. Nature, 243, 271–272.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morikawa, K., & McBeath, M. (1992). Lateral motion bias associated with reading direction. Vision Research, 32, 1137–1141.
Murch, W. (2001). In the blink of an eye. Beverly Hills, CA: Silman-James Press.
Nachshon, I. (1985). Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. International Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 161–174.
Nachshon, I., Argaman, E., & Luria, A. (1999). Effects of directional habits and handedness on aesthetic preference for left and right profiles. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 30, 106–114.
Netz, R. (1999). Linguistic formulae as cognitive tools. Pragmatics and Cognition, 7, 147–176.
Neurath, O. (1936). International picture language: The first rules of isotype. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.
Nickerson, J. V., Corter, J. E., Tversky, B., Zahner, D., & Rho, Y.-J. (2008). The spatial nature of thought: Understanding information systems design through diagrams. In R. Boland, M. Limayem, & B. Pentland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems.
Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Novick, L. R. (2001) Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought. In D. L. Medin (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 40. (pp. 279–325). New York: Academic Press.
Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2007). Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a Gestalt percep- tual principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 197–223.
Novick, L. R., & Hurley, S. M. (2001). To matrix, network, or hierarchy, that is the question. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 158–216.
Novick, L. R., Hurley, S. M., & Francis, M. (1999). Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations. Memory and Cognition, 27, 288–308.
Novick, L. R., Shade, C. K., & Catley, K. M. (2011). Linear versus branching depictions of evolutionary history: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 536–539.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York: Oxford.
Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing (pp. 73–126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
Sakhuja, T., Gupta, G. C., Singh, M., & Vaid, J. (1996). Reading habits affect asymmetries in facial affect judgements: A replication. Brain and Cognition, 32, 162–165.
Santiago, J., Lupianez, J., Perez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 512–516.
Santiago, J., Roman, A., Ouellet, M., Rodrıguez, N., & Perez-Azor, P. (2008). In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0220-0
Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185–213.
Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1992). Before writing, Volume 1: From counting to cuneiform. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. K. (2007). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research and design implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Harper Collins.
Schwartz, D. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321–354.
Shah, P., & Carpenter, P. A. (1995). Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 43–61.
Shah, P., & Freedman, E. (2010). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes. Topics in Cognitive Science.
Shah, P., Freedman, E., & Vekiri, I. (2005). The comprehension of quantitative information in graphical displays. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 426–476). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shah, P., Mayer, R. E., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: Signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 690–702.
Shepard, R. N., & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right urns in maps. Cognition, 18, 161–193.
Shepard, R. N., & Podgorny, P. (1978). Cognitive processes that resemble perceptual processes. In W. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, Vol. 5. (pp. 189–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schema. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 615–628.
Small, J. P. (1997). Wax tablets of the mind. New York: Routledge, Paul.
Smallman, H. S., St. John, M., Onck, H. M., & Cowen, M. (2001). “Symbicons”: A hybrid symbology that combines the best elements of symbols and icons. Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society (pp. 110–114).
Smith, M. C., & Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373–392.
Stafford, B. (2007). Echo objects: The cognitive work of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stasko, J., & Lawrence, A. (1998). Empirically assessing algorithm animations as learning aids. In J. Stasko, J. Domingue, M. H. Brown, & B. A. Price (Eds.), Software visualization (pp. 419–438). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97–140.
Suitner, C., & Maass, A. (2007). Positioning bias in portraits and self-portraits: Do female artists make different choices? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25, 71–95.
Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1996). What architects see in their sketches: Implications for design tools. In Human factors in computing systems: Conference companion (pp. 191–192). New York: ACM.
Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Constructive perception in design. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Computational and cognitive models of creative design V (pp. 227–239). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (2003). Constructive perception: A skill for coordinating perception and conception. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Meetings.
Suwa, M., Tversky, B., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2001). Seeing into sketches: Regrouping parts encourages new interpretations. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Purcell (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design(pp. 207–219). Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick Jr & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225–282). New York: Plenum.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vols 1 & 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992a). Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition, 20, 483–496.
Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992b). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261–282.
Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1997). Indexing events in memory: Evidence for index preferences. Memory, 5, 509–542.
Tolchinsky-Landsmann, L., & Levin, I. (1987). Writing in four- to six-year-olds: Representation of semantic and phonetic similarities and differences. Journal of Child Language, 14, 127–144.
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual explanations. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.
Tversky, B. (1995). Cognitive origins of graphic conventions. In F. T. Marchese (Ed.), Understanding images (pp. 29–53). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Tversky, B. (2000). Some ways that maps and graphs communicate. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition II: Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications (pp. 72–79). New York: Springer.
Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tversky, B. (2003). Navigating by mind and by body. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial reasoning (pp. 1–10). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Tversky, B. (2004). Semantics, syntax, and pragmatics of graphics. In K. Holmqvist & Y. Ericsson (Eds.), Language and visualisation (pp. 141–158). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of higher-level visuospatial thinking (pp. 1–34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, B., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Lee, P. U., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Stolte, C., & Daniele, M.-P. (2007). Cognitive design principles for generating visualizations. In G. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology (pp. 53–73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tversky, B., Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Zahner, D., & Rho, Y. J. (2008a). Transforming descriptions and diagrams to sketches in information system design. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lee, P., & Daniel, M.-P. (2009). Explanations in gesture, diagram, and word. In K. R. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, & J. A. Bateman (Eds.), Spatial language and dialogue (pp. 119–131). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lozano, S., MacKenzie, R., & Morrison, J. (2007). Enriching animations. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic produc- tions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.
Tversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1998). How space structures language. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge (pp. 157–175). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Tversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1999). Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In C. Freksa & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science (pp. 51–64). Berlin: Springer.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247–262.
Tversky, B., & Suwa, M. (2009). Thinking with sketches. In A. Markman (Ed.), Tools for innovation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Tversky, B., Suwa, M., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Stolte, C., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Klingner, J., Daniel, M.-P., Lee, P., & Haymaker, J. (2003). Sketches for design and design of sketches. In U. Lindemann (Ed.), Human behavior in design: Individuals, teams, tools (pp. 79–86). Berlin: Springer.
Tversky, B., Zacks, J. M., & Hard, B. M. (2008). The structure of experience. In T. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events. (pp. 436–464). Oxford, England: Oxford University.
Tversky, B., Zacks, J., Lee, P. U., & Heiser, J. (2000). Lines, blobs, crosses, and arrows: Diagrammatic commu- nication with schematic figures. In M. Anderson, P. Cheng, & V. Haarslev (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams (pp. 221–230). Berlin: Springer.
Vaid, J., & Singh, M. (1989). Asymmetries in the perception of facial effects: Is there an influence of reading habits? Neuropsychologia, 27, 1277–1286.
Vaid, J., Singh, M., Sakhuja, T., & Gupta, G. C. (2002). Stroke direction asymmetry in figure drawing: Influence of handedness and reading ⁄ writing habits. Brain and Cognition, 48, 597–602.
Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21, 14
Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ware, C. (2008). Visual thinking for design. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufman.
Westendorp, P., & van der Waarde, K. (2000 ⁄ 2001). Icons: Support or substitute? Information Design Journal, 10, 91–94.
Wiesner, D. (2001). The three pigs. New York: Clarion.
Wilkins, D. P. (1997). Alternative representations of space: Arrernte narratives in sand and sign. In M. Biermans & J.v.d. Weijer (Eds.), Proceedings of the CLS opening academic year 1997–1998 (pp. 133–162). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen ⁄ Tilburg Center for Language Studies.
Winn, W. D. (1987). Charts, graphs and diagrams in educational materials. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Haughton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Woodward, D., & Lewis, G. M. (1998). History of cartography. Vol. 2. Book 3: Cartography in the traditional Africa, America, Arctic, Australian, and Pacific societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zacks, J., Levy, E., Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. J. (1998). Reading bar graphs: Effects of depth cues and graphical context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 119–138.
Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (1999). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1073–1079
Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3–21.
Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 29–58.
Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number, concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 165–190.
Acknowledgments
The author is indebted to many colleagues, collaborators, and commentators, including Maneesh Agrawala, Jon Bresman, Herb Clark, Danny Cohen, Jim Corter, Stu Card, Felice Frankel, Nancy Franklin, Pat Hanrahan, Mary Hegarty, Julie Heiser, Angela Kessell, Paul Lee, Julie Morrison, Jeff Nickerson, Jane Nisselson, Laura Novick, Ben Shneiderman, Penny Small, Masaki Suwa, Holly Taylor, Jeff Zacks, and Doris Zahner. The author is also indebted to the following grants for facilitating the research and⁄or preparing the manu- script: National Science Foundation HHC 0905417, IIS-0725223, IIS-0855995, and REC 0440103, the Stanford Regional Visualization and Analysis Center, and Office of Naval Research NOOO14-PP-1-O649, N000140110717, and N000140210534.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tversky, B. (2014). Visualizing Thought. In: Huang, W. (eds) Handbook of Human Centric Visualization. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7484-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7485-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)