Abstract
Many theories of cerebellar learning assume that long-term depression (LTD) of synapses between parallel fibres (PFs) and Purkinje cells is the basis for pattern recognition in the cerebellum. Here we describe a series of computer simulations that use a morphologically realistic conductance-based model of a cerebellar Purkinje cell to study pattern recognition based on PF LTD. Our simulation results, which are supported by electrophysiological recordings in vitro and in vivo, suggest that Purkinje cells can use a novel neural code that is based on the duration of silent periods in their activity. The simulations of the biologically detailed Purkinje cell model are compared with simulations of a corresponding artificial neural network (ANN) model. We find that the predictions of the two models differ to a large extent. The Purkinje cell model is very sensitive to the amount of LTD induced, whereas the ANN is not. Moreover, the pattern recognition performance of the ANN increases as the patterns become sparser, while the Purkinje cell model is unable to recognise very sparse patterns. These results highlight that it is important to choose a model at a level of biological detail that fits the research question that is being addressed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albus JS (1971) A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosci 10:25–61
Armstrong DM, Rawson JA (1979) Activity patterns of cerebellar cortical neurones and climbing fibre afferents in the awake cat. J Physiol 289(1):425–448
Bower JM, Beeman D (1998) The book of GENESIS: exploring realistic neural models with the general neural simulation system, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Dayan P, Willshaw DJ (1991) Optimising synaptic learning rules in linear associative memories. Biol Cybern 65(4):253–265
De Schutter E, Bower J (1994a) An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell. I. Simulation of current clamps in slice. J Neurophysiol 71(1):375–400
De Schutter E, Bower J (1994b) An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell: II. Simulation of synaptic responses. J Neurophysiol 71(1):401–419
Engbers JD, Fernandez FR, Turner RW (2013) Bistability in Purkinje neurons: ups and downs in cerebellar research. Neural Netw 47:18–31
Gilbert PF (1974) A theory of memory that explains the function and structure of the cerebellum. Brain Res 70(1):1–18
Goossens J, Daniel H, Rancillac A, van der Steen J, Oberdick J, Crépel F, De Zeeuw CI, Frens MA (2001) Expression of protein kinase c inhibitor blocks cerebellar long-term depression without affecting Purkinje cell excitability in alert mice. J Neurosci 21(15):5813–5823
Graham BP (2001) Pattern recognition in a compartmental model of a CA1 pyramidal neuron. Network 12(4):473–492
Isope P, Barbour B (2002) Properties of unitary granule cell-Purkinje cell synapses in adult rat cerebellar slices. J Neurosci 22(22):9668–9678
Ito M (1984) The cerebellum and neural control. Raven Press, New York
Ito M (2001) Cerebellar long-term depression: characterization, signal transduction, and functional roles. Physiol Rev 81(3):1143–1195
Ito M, Sakurai M, Tongroach P (1982) Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol 324(1):113–134
Luthman J, Adams R, Davey N, Maex R, Steuber V (2009) Decoding of Purkinje cell pauses by deep cerebellar nucleus neurons. BMC Neurosci 10(Suppl 1):P105
Marr D (1969) A theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol 202:437–470
Medina JF, Garcia KS, Nores WL, Taylor NM, Mauk MD (2000) Timing mechanisms in the cerebellum: testing predictions of a large-scale computer simulation. J Neurosci 20(14):5516–5525
Mittmann W, Häusser M (2007) Linking synaptic plasticity and spike output at excitatory and inhibitory synapses onto cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Neurosci 27(21):5559–5570
Rapp M, Segev I, Yarom Y (1994) Physiology, morphology and detailed passive models of guinea-pig cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol 474(1):101–118
Schonewille M, Gao Z, Boele HJ, Veloz MFV, Amerika WE, Simek AA, Jeu MTD, Steinberg JP, Takamiya K, Hoebeek FE, Linden DJ, Huganir RL, Zeeuw CID (2011) Reevaluating the role of LTD in cerebellar motor learning. Neuron 70(1):43–50
Schutter ED, Steuber V (2009) Patterns and pauses in Purkinje cell simple spike trains: experiments, modeling and theory. Neuroscience 162(3):816–826
Schweighofer N, Ferriol G (2000) Diffusion of nitric oxide can facilitate cerebellar learning: a simulation study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(19):10661–10665
Shin SL, Hoebeek FE, Schonewille M, De Zeeuw CI, Aertsen A, De Schutter E (2007) Regular patterns in cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spike trains. PLoS ONE 2(5):e485
Sousa G, Adams R, Davey N, Maex R, Steuber V (2009) The effect of different forms of synaptic plasticity on pattern recognition in the cerebellar cortex. In: Kolehmainen M, Toivanen P, Beliczynski B (eds) Adaptive and natural computing algorithms, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5495. Springer Berlin, pp 413–422
Steuber V, De Schutter E (2001) Long-term depression and recognition of parallel fibre patterns in a multi-compartmental model of a cerebellar Purkinje cell. Neurocomputing 38:383–388
Steuber V, Jaeger D (2012) Modeling the generation of output by the cerebellar nuclei. Neural Netw 47:112–119
Steuber V, Mittmann W, Hoebeek FE, Silver RA, De Zeeuw CI, Häusser M, De Schutter E (2007) Cerebellar LTD and pattern recognition by Purkinje cells. Neuron 54(1):121–136
Walter JT, Khodakhah K (2006) The linear computational algorithm of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Neurosci 26(50):12861–12872
Walter JT, Khodakhah K (2009) The advantages of linear information processing for cerebellar computation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(11):4471–4476
Wang SSH, Denk W, Häusser M (2000) Coincidence detection in single dendritic spines mediated by calcium release. Nat Neurosci 3(12):1266–1273
Willshaw D, Buneman O, Longuet-Higgins H (1969) Non-holographic associative memory. Nature 222:960–962
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Calculation of the Signal-to-Noise Ratio for the ANN
Appendix: Calculation of the Signal-to-Noise Ratio for the ANN
We here derive a simple approximation for the signal-to-noise ratio of the ANN responses to stored and novel patterns. We assume, as in Fig. 26.4, that the synapses take binary values: they are either depressed or non-depressed, and without loss of generality (see below) we assign them weights zero and one. In this case, the responses to stored patterns are always zero, as is their variance. Hence we need only to calculate the mean and variance of the responses to novel patterns. For this we proceed in two steps: (a) find the number D of depressed synapses; (b) draw A synapses (A being the number of active synapses per pattern) from a pool of n = S synapses of which D are depressed. Let us start with the second problem, so D is supposed to be known.
Calculating the response to a novel pattern is now equivalent to drawing, without replacement, A balls from an urn containing S balls of which D are white (depressed) and S − D balls are red (non-depressed). The distribution of the number of red balls drawn on each trial is known to be hypergeometric. However, if S be very large compared to A, the numbers approximate a binomial distribution with the probability p of drawing a non-depressed synapse equal to \( (1-D/S)\). A binomial distribution has mean n p and variance n p (1 − p), hence the average output of the ANN for novel patterns will be \( A(1-D/S)\) with variance \( A(1-D/S)(D/S)\). The signal-to-noise ratio becomes:
Note that the signal-to-noise ratio does not depend on the exact values of the weights assigned to the binary synapses. If the depressed and non-depressed synapses were to be assigned weights a and b, respectively, instead of 0 and 1, we would obtain from the binomial distributions μ s = a n, \( {m}_{n}=an(1-p)+bnp\), σ s 2 = 0, and \( {s}_{n}^{2}={(a-b)}^{2}np(1-p)\), which after substitution yields the same value for s∕n.
We now turn to the problem of assessing the number D of depressed synapses. If the number of learned patterns L is very small and/or the patterns are very sparse (A small), then the degree of overlap between learned patterns will also be small, so that D becomes approximately equal to L A (each depressed synapse is unique).
Then the signal-to-noise ratio reduces to:
where it is assumed that L ∗ A ≪ S. Hence the “s/n” signal-to-noise ratio is proportional to the number S of synapses and inversely proportional to the number L of learned patterns.
If L A is large, we cannot assume L A to be a good approximation of D. But let us assume all synapses are independently depressed with probability A∕S for each pattern, then each synapse has probability \( {(1-A/S)}^{L}\) of not having been depressed by any of the L patterns, and consequently the mean number D of depressed synapses will approximate \( S-S{(1-A/S)}^{L}\).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Sousa, G., Maex, R., Adams, R., Davey, N., Steuber, V. (2014). Synaptic Plasticity and Pattern Recognition in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells. In: Cuntz, H., Remme, M., Torben-Nielsen, B. (eds) The Computing Dendrite. Springer Series in Computational Neuroscience, vol 11. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8094-5_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8094-5_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8093-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8094-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)