Skip to main content

Introduction to Hemodynamic Monitoring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monitoring Technologies in Acute Care Environments
  • 3068 Accesses

Abstract

Accurate assessment of hemodynamic status is vital for making correct decisions in the acute care environment. Clinical examination and the monitoring of vital signs alone, though being of utmost importance, may often be inadequate for this purpose. Since management decisions, when based on inaccurate clinical assessment, may be detrimental to patients, additional monitoring of various physiological variables may be of help in better guiding and titrating therapy. The selection and application of specific monitoring modalities and the correct interpretation of the monitored variables present however a considerable challenge. Common pitfalls of hemodynamic monitoring include the underestimation of the limitations and confounding factors of hemodynamic variables, overreliance on single numerical values, and the frequent inherent inaccuracies of the monitoring process itself. Since outcome is determined mainly by our clinical decisions and not by the monitor we use, the ensuing general lack of evidence about the impact of hemodynamic monitoring on patient outcome presents another significant obstacle in choosing the right monitor for the right patient. A thorough understanding of the underlying physiology and of the limitations of hemodynamic variables, continuity of measurement, a multiparametric approach, and more reliable decision-making strategies are some of the means that will allow us to correctly combine both established and newer monitoring technologies for the benefit of our patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sevransky J. Clinical assessment of hemodynamically unstable patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15(3):234–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kavanagh BP, Meyer LJ. Normalizing physiological variables in acute illness: five reasons for caution. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(9):1161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, Martin GS, Della Rocca G, Vallet B, et al. Clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring – a consensus of 16. Crit Care. 2011;15(4):229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Perel A. Bench-to-bedside review: the initial hemodynamic resuscitation of the septic patient according to Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines – does one size fit all? Crit Care. 2008;12(5):223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(5):1180–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cannesson M, Pestel G, Ricks C, Hoeft A, Perel A. Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists. Crit Care. 2011;15(4):R197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feldman JM. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? The role of patient monitors in medical decision making. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):707–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a “gray zone” approach. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(2):231–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ospina-Tascón GA, Cordioli RL, Vincent JL. What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients? Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(5):800–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bellomo R, Uchino S. Cardiovascular monitoring tools: use and misuse. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9(3):225–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Young D, Griffiths J. Clinical trials of monitoring in anaesthesia, critical care and acute ward care: a review. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(1):39–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vincent JL. We should abandon randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(Suppl):S534–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tobin MJ. The role of a journal in a scientific controversy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(5):511–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azriel Perel MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perel, A. (2014). Introduction to Hemodynamic Monitoring. In: Ehrenfeld, J., Cannesson, M. (eds) Monitoring Technologies in Acute Care Environments. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8557-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8557-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8556-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8557-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics