Skip to main content

The Necessity for Studying Organizational Advocacy Comparatively

  • Chapter
Measuring the Impact of the Nonprofit Sector

Part of the book series: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies ((NCSS))

Abstract

Brian O’Connell, founding president of INDEPENDENT SECTOR, in his incredibly widely cited claim, termed advocacy “the quintessential function of the voluntary sector” (O’Neill, 1989, p. 114). The subtext of that claim undoubtedly accounts for its broad resonance among functionaries in the nonprofit sector: nonprofit organizations (translated into the latest resonant language, “civil society institutions”) can be expected to leap into the breach to represent the interests of the poor and physically disadvantaged who are unable to represent themselves in the rough-and-tumble of U.S. interest group politics. That sense of advocacy is the focus of our interest and motivation for the analysis that follows, even though we are convinced that advocacy cannot be understood by studying it in isolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bailey, C. W. (1996). Snakes in the grass. Washington Monthly, 28 (September), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Walker, J. L. (1988). Survey research and membership in voluntary associations. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 908–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, ER. & Leech, B. L. (1998). The importance of groups in politics and political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bykerk, L. & Maney, A. (1995). Consumer groups and coalition politics on capitol hill. In A. j. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed., pp. 259–279). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1982). The asymmetric society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGregorio, C, & Rossotti, J. E. (1995). Campaigning for the court interest group participation. In A.J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed., pp. 215–238). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faucheux, R. (1995). The grassroots explosion. Campaigns and elections, (December/January), 20–25, 53–56, 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M., & Edwards, R. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7, 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W (1990). The strategy of social protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, N. M. (1995). Personal correspondence to Honorable Ernest Istook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accounting Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1990). Taxonomy as politics. Dissent, 28 (Winter), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, Philip Babcock (Ed.). (1986). Webster’s Third new International Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronbjerg, K. A. (1992). Developing a universe of nonprofit organizations: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronbjerg, K. A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzke, A. (1988). Representing God in Washington: The role of religious lobbies in the American polity. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, B. R. (1992). Charity, advocacy, and the law. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrebenar, R.J. (1997). Interest group politics in America. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. C. (1987). Nonprofit organizations and policy advocacy. In Walter Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector (pp. 296–318). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallenberg, A. L., Knoke, D., Marsden, P. V, & Spaeth, J. L. (1994). The national organizations study. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 860–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. (1990). Organizing for collective action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, A. (1996). The diminishing divide: American churches, American politics. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. D., & Castelli, J. (1994). Working for justice: The campaign for human development and poor empowerment groups. Washington, DC: Life Cycle Institute, The Catholic University of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. D., Smith, J. & Zald, M. N. (1996). Accessing public, media, electoral and governmental agendas. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy and M. N. Zald, (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunity, mobilizing structures and cultural framings (pp. 291–311). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J. M. (1982). Hypernetwork sampling: Duality and differentiation among voluntary associations. Social Networks 3, 25–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (1989). The third America: The emergence of the nonprofit sector in the United States. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petracca, M. P. (1992). The politics of interest: Interest groups transformed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rampton, S., & Stauber, J. C. (1995). Yes, in your backyard: Flacking at the grass-roots level. PR Watch, 2, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992a). In search of the non-profit sector 1: The question of definitions. Voluntas, 3, 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992b). In search of the non-profit sector II: The problem of classification. Voluntas, 3, 267–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1997). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K. L., & Tierney, J. T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. H. (1994). The rest of the nonprofit sector I: The nature of grassroots associations in America. Prepared for Annual ARNOVA Meeting, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaeth, J. L., & O’Rourke, D. P. (1994). Designing and implementing the national organizations study. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 872–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Postal Rate Commission (1987). Study of political advocacy in third-class nonprofit mail. Washington, DC: Postal Rate Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L, & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. L., Jr. (1991). Mobilizing interest groups in America: Patrons, professions and social movements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, J. (1983). Multiply your clout with a grassroots lobbying network. Association Management, 35(April), 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R., Ian, N. B., & Bailey, D. (1994). The structure of national nonprofit associations: survey results. Working Paper. Aspen Institute: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCarthy, J.D., Castelli, J. (2002). The Necessity for Studying Organizational Advocacy Comparatively. In: Flynn, P., Hodgkinson, V.A. (eds) Measuring the Impact of the Nonprofit Sector. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0533-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0533-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46548-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0533-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics