Abstract
This paper examines several analogies employed in computational data analysis techniques: the analogy to the brain for artificial neural networks, the analogy to statistical mechanics for simulated annealing and the analogy to evolution for genetic algorithms. After exploring these analogies, we compare them to analogies in scientific models and highlight that scientific models address specific empirical phenomena, whereas data analysis models are application-neutral: they can be used whenever a set of data meets certain formal requirements, regardless of what phenomenon these data pertain to. Through the analogy, computational data analysis techniques inherit a conceptual idea from which the principle of the technique is developed. In all cases of computational data analysis techniques, the analogies used - and the metaphors generated by them - help us to understand the technique by providing a more concrete framework for understanding what is otherwise an abstract method. In the different examples, however, the significance of the analogies varies. Analogy can, though need not, be indispensable for a technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achinstein, P., 1968, Concepts of Science, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.
Bailer-Jones, C.A.L., 2000, Stellar parameters from very low resolution spectra and medium band filters. Teff, log g and [M/H] using neural networks, Astronomy & Astrophysics 357:197–205.
Bailer-Jones, D. ML, 2001 (to appear), Models, metaphors and analogies, in: Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Science, P. Machamer and M. Silberstein, eds., Blackwell, Oxford.
Bogen, J. and Woodward, J., 1988, Saving the phenomena, The Philosophical Review 97:303–352.
Harman, P. M., 1982, Energy, Force and Matter, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., and Palmer, R.G., 1991, Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham.
Hesse, M., 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
Holland, J.H., 1975, Adaptation in Artificial and Natural Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt Jr., CD., and Vecchi, M.P., 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220:671–680.
McCulloch, W.S. and Pitts, W.S., 1943, A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity, Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5:115–133.
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H., and Teller, E., 1953, Equation of state calculations for fast computing machines, Journal of Chemical Physics 21:1087–1092.
Mitchell, M., 1996, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Martin, J. and Harre, R., 1982, Metaphor in science, in: Metaphor, Miall, D. S., ed.. The Harvester Press, Sussex, pp. 89–105.
Sabin, T.J., Bailer-Jones, C.A.L., and Withers, P.J., 2000, Accelerated learning using Gaussian process models to predict static recrystallization in an Al-Mg alloy, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 8:687–706.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bailer-Jones, D.M., Bailer-Jones, C.A.L. (2002). Modeling Data: Analogies in Neural Networks, Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithms. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0605-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5154-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0605-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive