Skip to main content

Abstract

Group atomic broadcast is a fundamental service for implementing fault-tolerant applications. This paper reports discrete event simulation results that compare the performance of five asynchronous atomic broadcast protocols in point-to-point networks. We investigate the average time taken to deliver a message as a function of group size and message interarrival time as well as the average number of messages used to complete a broadcast. We are interested in both failure free performance, as well as performance in the presence of a single communication failure. Our comparison shows that there is no overall best protocol. We identify those application areas where a protocol dominates the other protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Birman, A. Schiper, and P. Stephenson. Lightweight causal and atomic group multicast.ACM Transactions on Computer Systems9(3):272–314, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Carr. The tandem global update protocol.Tandem Systems ReviewJune 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. [] F. Cristian. Asynchronous atomic broadcast.IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin33(9):115–116, Feb 1991. Also presented at the First IEEE Workshop on Management of Replicated Data, Houston, TX, (Nov 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Cristian, H. Aghili, R. Strong, and D. Dolev. Atomic broadcast: from simple message diffusion to byzantine agreement. InProceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Fault-tolerant Systemspages 200–206, Ann Arbor, MI, June 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Kaashoek, A. Tanenbaum, S. Hummel, and H. Bal. An efficient reliable broadcast protocol.Operating Systems Review23(4):5–19, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. K. Molloy.Fundamentals of Performance Modelling.Macmillan Publishing Co., NewYork, NY, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cristian, F., de Beijer, R., Mishra, S. (1995). Comparing How Well Asynchronous Atomic Broadcast Protocols Perform. In: Fussell, D.S., Malek, M. (eds) Responsive Computer Systems: Steps Toward Fault-Tolerant Real-Time Systems. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 297. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2271-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2271-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-9563-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2271-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics