Skip to main content

Support Utilization by Two Sympatric Lemur Species

Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi and Eulemur fulvus rufus

  • Chapter
New Directions in Lemur Studies

Abstract

The supports utilized by Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi and Eulemur fulvus rufus for displacement and feeding were studied in the Kirindy Forest/CFPF of southwest-em Madagascar. Support dimensions were classified in four categories (small, medium, large, and enormous). Support orientation was classified in four categories (horizontal, oblique, angled, and vertical). Comparisons between the structures available in the forest and the supports used by these lemurs showed thatP. verreauxiused mainly intermediate and large sized supports and vertical structures for locomotion; whileE. fulvusused the different sized supports according to their availability in the forest, but moved disproportionally more often quadrupedally on horizontal and oblique supports. Both species used small and horizontal supports to feed from. Comparing the two lemur species, P.verreauxiused larger trunks and branches that were more often vertical or angular than the supports used byE. fulvusfor locomotion and feeding. In contrastE. fulvusused horizontal branches more frequently for locomotion and especially when feeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, J.-P, B. Rakotonirina, M. Randrianasolo, J. U. Ganzhorn, V. Jeannoda, and E. G. Leigh. 1996.Tree diversity on small plots in Madagascar: a preliminary review. Revue d’Ecologie, 51: 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, C.H., and M. Leighton. 1994. Comparative locomotor ecology of gibbons and macaques: selection of canopy elements for crossing gaps. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 93: 505–524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charles-Dominique, P., and C.M. Hladik. 1971. Le Lepilemur du sud de Madagascar: écologie, alimentation et vie sociale. La Terre et la Vie, 25: 3–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromrron, R.H. 1984. Foraging, habitat structure, and locomotion in two species of Galago, pp. 73–111. In Rodman, P. S., and J.G.H. Cant, eds., Adaptations for Foraging in Nonhuman Primates. Contributions to an Organismal Biology of Prosimians, Monkeys, and Apes. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R.H., W.I. Sellers, and M.M. Günther. 1993. Energetic efficiency and ecology as selective factors in the saltatory adaptation of prosimian primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 254: 41–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dagosto, M. 1994. Testing positional behavior of Malagasy lemurs: a randomization approach. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 94: 189–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dagosto, M.. 1995. Seasonal variation in positional behavior of Malagasy lemurs. International Journal of Primatology, 16: 807–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demes, B., and M. Günther. 1989. Biomechanics and allometric scaling in primate locomotion and morphology. Folia Primatologica, 53: 125–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demes, B., W.L. Jungers, T.S. Gross, and J.G. Fleagle. 1995. Kinetics of leaping primates: Influence of substrate orientation and compliance. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 95: 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J.G. 1978. Locomotion, posture, and habitat utilization in two sympatric Malaysian Leaf Monkeys (Presbytis obscura and Presbytis melalophus), pp. 243–251. In Montgomery, G. G., ed., Ecology of Arboreal Folivores. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J.G.. 1984. Primate locomotion and diet, pp. 105–117. In Chivers, D.J., B.A. Wood, and A. Bilsborough, eds.,Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleagle, J.G. and R.A. Mitrermeier. 1980. Locomotor behavior, body size, and comparative ecology of seven Surinam monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 52: 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzhorn, J.U. 1989. Niche separation of the seven lemur species in the eastern rainforest of Madagascar. Oecologia, 79: 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzhorn, J.U. 1995. Low level forest disturbance effects on primary production, leaf chemistry, and lemur popula-tions. Ecology, 76: 2084–2096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzhorn, J.U., and P.M. Kappeler. 1996. Lemurs of the Kirindy Forest, pp. 257–274. In Ganzhorn, J.U., and J.-P. Sorg,eds., Ecology and Economy of a Tropical Dry Forest in Madagascar. Primate Report, 46–1: 1–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzhorn, J.U., and J.-P. Sorg [eds.]. 1996. Ecology and Economy of a Tropical Dry Forest in Madagascar. Primate Report, 46–1: 1–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier-Hion, A., J. P. Gautier, and R. Quris. 1981. Forest structure and fruit availability as complementary factors influencing habitat use by a troop of monkeys (Cercopithecus cephus). La Terre et la Vie, 35: 511–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebo, D.L. 1987. Locomotor diversity in prosimian primates. American Journal of Primatology, 13: 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebo, D.L., and C. A. Chapman. 1995. Positional behavior in five sympatric Old World Monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 97: 49–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, L.R., W.L. Jungers, K.E. Reed, E.L. Simons, and P.S. Chatrath. 1997. Inferences about past and present primate communities in Madagascar, pp. 218–256. In Goodman, S. M., and B. D. Patterson, eds., Natural Change and Human Impact in Madagascar. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S.M. 1994. Description of a new species of subfossil eagle from Madagascar: Stephanoaetus (Aves: Falconiformes) from the deposits of Ampasambazimba. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 107: 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S.M., S.O)connor, and O.Langrand. 1993. A review of predation on lemurs: implications for the evolu-tion of social behavior in small nocturnal primates, pp. 51–66. In Kappeler, P. M., and J U. Ganzhorn, eds., Lemur Social Systems and their Ecological Basis. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S.M., L.A. Rene De Roland, and R. Thorstrom. 1998. Predation On the eastern Wholly Lemur(Avahi langer) and other vertebrates by Henst’s Goshawk (Accipiter henstii). Lemur News, 3: 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand, T. I. 1984. Motion economy within the canopy:four strategies for mobility, pp. 55–72. In Rodman, P.S., and J. H. Cant, eds., Adaptation for Foraging in Non-human Primates. Columbia University Press,New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, C.S., and L.T. Nash. 1986. Species difference in substrate use, and diet between sympatric galagos in two Kenyan coastal forest. Primates, 27: 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouffroy, E.K., C.E. Oxnard, and R.Z. German. 1982. Interpretation phylogenetique des proportions des membres des tarsiers, par comparison avec les autres prosimiens sauteurs. Analyse multivarée. Compte Rendus Académie Science, Paris, Série D, 295: 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, W.L. 1978. The functional significance of skeletal allometry in Megaladapis in comparison to living prosimians. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 49: 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P.M., and E.W Heymann. 1996. Nonconvergence in the evolution of primate life history and socio-ecology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 59: 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgraw, W. S.1996. Cercopithecid locomotion, support use and support availability in the Tai Forest, Ivory Coast. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 100: 507–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R.A., and M.G.M. van Roosmalen. 1981. Preliminary observations on habitat utilization and diet in eight Surinam monkeys. Folia Primatologica, 36: 1–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Napier, J.R.,and P.H. Napier. 1967. A Handbook of Living Primates. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdorff, D.J. 1996. Ecological correlates to social structure in two lemur species in Madagascar. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 100: 487–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oxnard, C.E., R.H.Crompton,and S.S.Lieberman. 1990. Animal Lifestyles and Anatomies. University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petter, J.J.R. Albignac, and Y. Rumpler. 1977. Faune de Madagascar: Mammifères Lémuriens, Vol. 44. Orstom/Cnrs, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pounds, J. A. 1991. Habitat structure and morphological patterns in arboreal vertebrates, pp. 109–119. In Bell, S.E. Mccoy, and H. Mushinsky, eds., Habitat Structure. The Physical Arrangements of Objects in Space. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuschoft H., H. Witte, and M. Fischer. 1995. Locomotion in nocturnal prosimians, pp. 453–472. In Alterman, L., G. A. Doyle, and M. K. Izard, eds., Creatures of the Dark: The Nocturnal Prosimians. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuschoft H., M.M. Günther, and A. Christian. 1998. Size dependence in Prosimian locomotion and itsimplications for the distribution of body mass. Folia Primatologica, 69, Supplement 1: 60–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakotonirina XX.. 1996. Composition and structure of a dry forest on sandy soils near Morondava, pp. 81–87.In Ganzhorn, J.U., and J.P. Sorg, eds., Ecology and Economy of a Tropical Dry Forest in Madagascar.Primate Report, 46–1: 1–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasoloarison, R.M., B.P.N. Rasolonandrasana, J.U. Ganzhorn, and S.M. Goodman. 1995. Predationon vertebrates in the Kirindy Forest, western Madagascar. Ecotropica, 1: 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasolonandrasana, B.R.N. 1994. Contribution à l’étude de l’alimentation de Cryptoprocta ferox Bennet(1833) dans son milieu naturel. D.E.A. Thesis, Université d’Antananarivo, Antananarivo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, A.F., and R.E. Dewar. 1991. Lemur ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 22:145–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J.H., and I. Tattersall. 1985. Evolutionary relationships of the living lemurs and the lorises (Mammalia, Primates) and their potential affinities with European Eocene Adapidae. Anthropological Paper of the American Museum of Natural History, 1: 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorg, J.-E, and U. Rohner. 1996. Climate and phenology of the dry deciduous forest at Kirindy, pp. 57–80. In Ganzhorn, J. U., and J.-P. Sorg, eds., Ecology and Economy of a Tropical Dry Forest in Madagascar. Primate Report 46–1: 1–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, R.W 1974. Ecological distinctions in sympatric species of Lemur, pp. 75–108. In Martin, R.D., G.A. Doyle, and A.C. Walker, eds., Prosimian Biology. Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terranova, C.J. 1996. Variations in leaping of lemurs. American Journal of Primatology, 40: 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C.E, and P.M. Kappeler. 1996. The social system of gregarious lemurs: lack of convergence with anthropoids due to evolutionary disequilibrium? Ethology, 102: 915–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R.D. 1994. Lazy leapers: a study of the locomotor ecology of two species of saltatory nocturnal lemur in sympatry at Ampijoroa, Madagascar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C.E, and P.M. Kappeler. 1997. Habitat use and support preference of two free-ranging saltatory lemurs (Lepilemur edwardsiand Avahi occidentalis). Journal of Zoology, London, 241: 325–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C.E, and P.M. Kappeler. and R.H. Crompton. 1996. Lazy leapers: energetics, phylogenetic inertia, and the locomotor differen-tiation of the Malagasy primates, pp. 259–266. In Lourenço, W, ed., Biogeography of Madagascar. ORSTOM, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C.E, and P.M. Kappeler.1998. Diet, body size, and the energy costs of locomotion in saltatory primates. Folia Primatologica, 69,Supplement 1: 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Razafimanantsoa, L. (1999). Support Utilization by Two Sympatric Lemur Species. In: Rakotosamimanana, B., Rasamimanana, H., Ganzhorn, J.U., Goodman, S.M. (eds) New Directions in Lemur Studies. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4705-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4705-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7131-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4705-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics