Skip to main content

Modelling Bounded Rationality in Agent-Based Simulations Using the Evolution of Mental Models

  • Chapter
Computational Techniques for Modelling Learning in Economics

Part of the book series: Advances in Computational Economics ((AICE,volume 11))

Abstract

There are many possible ways of modelling economic agents. These traditionally fall into one of two camps, dating from Simon’s distinction between substantive and procedural rationality: this is often characterised as those with bounded rationality and those with no such bounds (although this is not strictly correct, Moss & Sent forthcoming). Although the latter type is more analytically tractable we are interested in the former type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akiyama, E. and K. Kaneko: 1996, ‘Evolution of Cooperation, Differentiation, Complexity, and Diversity in an Iterated Three-person Game’. Artificial Life 2, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeline, P. and K. E. Kinnear: 1996, Advances in Genetic Programming, Vol.2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arifovic, J.: 1994, ‘Genetic Algorithm Learning and the Cobweb Model’. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, B.: 1994, ‘Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality’. American Economic Association Papers 84, 406–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., L. Marengo, A. Bassanini & M. Valente: forthcoming, ‘Norms as Emergent Properties of Adaptive Learning’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, B.: 1998a, ‘Meta-Genetic Programming: co-evolving the genetic operators’. CPM Report 98–32, MMU, Manchester, UK. (http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmrep32.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, B.: 1998b, ‘Modelling Socially Intelligent Agents’. Applied Artificial Intelligence 12, 677–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J.L.: 1993, ‘Learning and Development in Neural Networks - The Importance of Starting Small’. Cognition 48, 71–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaylard, H.: 1996, ‘A Cognitive Approach to Modelling Structural Change’. CPM Report 96–20, MMU, Manchester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H.: 1992, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, 2nd Ed.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, K.: 1990, ‘Globally Coupled Chaos Violates the Law of Large Numbers but not the Central Limit Theorem’. Physics Review Letters 65, 1391–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnear, K. E. (ed.): 1994, Advances in Genetic Programming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R.: 1992, Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montana, D. J.: 1995, ‘Strongly Typed Genetic Programming’. Evolutionary Computation 3, 199–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. J. and B. Edmonds: 1998, ‘Modelling Economic Learning as Modelling’. Cybernetics and Systems 29, 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. J., H. Gaylard, S. Wallis, and B. Edmonds: 1998, ‘SDML: A Multi-Agent Language for Organizational Modelling’. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 4, 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. and Sent, E-M.: 1998, ‘Boundedly versus Procedurally Rational Expectations’. In: Hallet, H and McAdam, P. (eds.), New Directions in Macro Economic Modelling,: Kluwer, pp..

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R.G. et. al.: 1994, ‘Artificial Economic Life - A simple model of a stockmarket’. Physica D 75,264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.: 1972, The Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügel-Bennett, A. and J. L. Shapiro: 1994, ‘An Analysis of Genetic Algorithms Using Statistical Mechanics’. Physical Review Letters 72, 1305–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vriend, N.J.: 1995, ‘Self-organization of markets: an example of a computational approach’. Computational Economics 8, 205–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambrano, E.: 1997, ‘The Revelation Principle of Bounded Rationality’. Sante Fe working paper 97–06–060, New Mexico, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edmonds, B. (1999). Modelling Bounded Rationality in Agent-Based Simulations Using the Evolution of Mental Models. In: Brenner, T. (eds) Computational Techniques for Modelling Learning in Economics. Advances in Computational Economics, vol 11. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5029-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5029-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7285-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5029-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics