Skip to main content

Paragraphs of Pictographs: The Use of Non-verbal Instructions for Equipment

  • Chapter
Processing of Visible Language

Part of the book series: Nato Conference Series ((HF,volume 13))

Abstract

This paper is concerned with pictorial means of communicating instructions for the use of equipment. The problems differ from those involved in development of discrete symbols, in that instructions require representations of states, actions, and conditional relations comparable to those represented in natural language. Accordingly, our approach concentrates on analogues of linguistic factors and pictorial aspects of sequence and context.

Two tasks were used involving interpretation of sequences of pictorial instructions for an apparatus. In one task subjects gave a verbal interpretation of pictorial instructions; in the other task they used the same instructions to operate the device, which simulated the operation of an English pay-phone. Comprehension was affected by how much of the apparatus was depicted in each picture, segmentations of the picture sequence, and the use of insets. The effects of graphic variables and the error patterns implicate cognitive structures underlying comprehension of pictorial instructions (especially relations between actions and states). Amongst other comparisons with natural language, the inferential nature of interpretation is emphasised. Differences between the two tasks indicate people’s strategies in using instructions to operate equipment. Indeed, the effect of graphic variables can only be understood in the context of users’ strategies and their preconceptions about particular equipment.

There has been surprisingly little research on pictorial instructions for the operation of equipment. Obvious applications include international usage and user populations of limited literacy or with impaired language. Even literate native speakers of a language often find written instructions difficult to follow. Not only might pictorial instructions serve as an alternative to verbal texts, but they might also aid comprehension when the two are presented together.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnheim, R. Art and visual perception. Revised edition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, P.J., & Marcel, A.J. A preliminary investigation of factors influencing the interpretation of pictorial instructions for the use of apparatus. In D. Anderson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications. Harlow, Essex: Standard Telecommunications Laboratories, Ltd., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G.H. Experiments on story understanding and recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976, 28, 511–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D.E. Language and ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 1977, 8, 15–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, M. Interpretability of graphic symbols as a function of context and experience factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 376–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Clark, E. Semantic distinctions and memory for complex sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 20, 129–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deregowski, J. Perception. In H.C. Triandis, W. Lonner, & A. Heron (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Vol. II: Basic processes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design. Fve rediscovered hieroglyphics. Editorial article. Design, 1975, 323, November 1975, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby, R.S. Perception of symbols for machine displays. Ergonomics, 1970, 13, 149–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, E.A. Use of pictograms in instructions. In, Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications. Paper VII.2. Swedish Telecommunications Administration, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T.G. A program for the solution of a class of geometric analogy intelligence-test questions. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., & Robson, J.E. Perceiving the language of films. Perception, 1975, 4, 97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. The processing of norhlinguistic symbols by aphasics. In Proceedings of International Neuropsychology Society European Conference, Oxford, August, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E.H. The story of art. London: Phaidon, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E.H. Symbolic images. London: Phaidon, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadler, U. Instructions for use by means of symbols. In Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications. Paper VII. 1. Swedish Telecommunications Administration, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornby, P.A. Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 530–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.E. Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of linguistic units. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P.A. Some formal characteristics of pictograms. American Scientist, 1969, 57(3), 348–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascelli, J. The five C’s of cinematography. Hollywood: Cinegrafic Publications, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michotte, A. The perception of causality. (Translated by T.R. Miles & E. Miles). London: Methuen, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.R. From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47(3), 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. Language in chimpanzees? Science, 1971, 172, 808–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. London: Batsford, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. Understanding natural language. Cognitive Pyschology, 1972 3, 1–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. Presenting technical information: A survey of research findings. Instructional Science, 1977, 6, 93–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & Barnard, P.J. “Just fill in this form” - A review for designers. Applied Ergonomics, 1975, 6.4, 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marcel, T., Barnard, P. (1979). Paragraphs of Pictographs: The Use of Non-verbal Instructions for Equipment. In: Kolers, P.A., Wrolstad, M.E., Bouma, H. (eds) Processing of Visible Language. Nato Conference Series, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0994-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0994-9_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-0996-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-0994-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics