Abstract
This review primarily is addressed to research published in the English language on Piaget’s notions of the object concept. The infant’s achievement of the concept of the object can be viewed as the cardinal achievement of the sensorimotor period. To have the idea that the world is populated with enduring, independent objects, including persons and events, implies that the infant has a scheme of cause, space, and time within a coherent framework. Further, Piaget has argued that the conceptions of cause, space, and time develop consistently with an invariant reference point, which is nothing else but the concept of the object. As we shall discuss below, Piaget’s theory of what is object awareness and how it is achieved contrasts strongly with empiricistic views. The infant does not become increasingly aware of the nature of objects through repeated exposure to them. Rather, the infant constructs, in stages, a scheme of the object of his knowledge through his sensorimotor activity in the physical and social world of things and persons. Piaget (1954) diagnoses the stages from the infant’s responses to hidden objects. He describes six stages. In the first two, the infant shows no special behavior related to objects. In the next two stages, the infant’s orientation to hidden objects is determined by how he acted on them while they were in view. In the fifth stage, the infant’s search is free of prior activity; he need only see where the object disappears to find it. But it is only in the sixth stage that the infant can consistently imagine and identify the location of objects, even when their place of disappearance is subsequently obscured.
I wish to give special thanks to M. Keith Moo:e. I acknowledge a heavy debt for his inspiration and ideas about the work contained in this review. Also, I am very appreciative of the considerable help Hans Furth has provided on both substantive and editorial issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ainsworth, M., 1974, The development of infant-mother attachment, in “Review of Child Development Research” B. M. Caldwell and H. N. Ricciuti (eds.),University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Appel, K. J., 1971, Three studies in object conceptualization: Piaget’s sensorimotor Stages four and five. Unpublished dissertation, University of Houston.
Bartlett, F., 1958, “Thinking,” Basic Books, New York.
Bell, S. M., 1970, The development of the concept of the object as related to infant-mother attachment. Child Development 41: 291–311.
Bell, S. M., 1971, Early cognitive development and its relationship to infant-mother attachment: A study of disadvantaged Negro infants. Final report, Project No. 508, U.S. Office of Education.
Bloom, L., 1973, “One Word at a Time,” Mouton, The Hague.
Bower, T. G. R., 1966, The visual world of infants, Scientific American 215: 80–92.
Bower, T. G. R., 1967, The development of object permanence: Some studies of existence constancy, Perception and Psychophysics 2: 411–418.
Bower, T. G. R., 1972a, Object perception in infants, Perception 2: 411–418.
Bower, T. G. R., 1972b, Mechanisms of cognitive development in infants. Colloquium, MIT Psychology Department.
Bower, T. G. R.,1974, Repetition in human development,Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 20: 303–318.
Bower, T. G. R., and Paterson, J. G., 1972, Stages in the development of the object concept, Cognition 1 (1).
Bower, T. G. R., and Paterson, J. G., 1973, The separation of place, movement and object in the world of the infant, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 15: 161–168.
Bower, T. G. R., and Wishart, J. G., 1972, The effects of motor skill on object permanence, Cognition 1: 165–172.
Bower, T. G. R., Broughton, J. M., and Moore, M. K., 1970a, Assessment of intention in sensorimotor infants, Nature 228: 679–681.
Bower, T. G. R., Broughton, J. M., and Moore, M. K., 1970b, The coordination of visual and tactual input in infants, Perception and Psychophysics 8: 51–53.
Bower, T. G. R., Broughton, J. M., and Moore, M. K., 1971, Development of the object concept as manifested in the tracking behavior of infants between seven and twenty weeks of age, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 11: 182–193.
Broussard, M. D., 1974, The infant’s conception of object permanence and his reactions to strangers, in “The Infant’s Reaction to Strangers” T. G. Decarie (ed.), International Universities Press, New York.
Broussard, M. D., 1974, The infant’s conception of object permanence and his reactions to strangers, in “The Infant’s Reaction to Strangers” T. G. Decarie (ed.), International Universities Press, New York.
Bruner, J. S., 1969, The growth and structure of skill, in “Motor Skills in Infancy” K. J. Connally (ed.), CIBA Foundation, Academic Press, New York.
Bruner, J. S., 1973, Organization of early skilled action, Child Development 44: 1–11.
Brunet, O., et Lezine, I., 1965, “Le Développement psychologique de la première enfance,” Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Butterworth, G., 1974, Object permanence during infancy, D. Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.
Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D., 1959, Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin 56: 81–105.
Casati, I., and Lezine, I., 1968, Les étapes de l’intelligence sensori-motrice de l’enfant de la naissance à deux ans, Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris.
Charlesworth, W. R., 1966, Development of the object concept: A methodological study, paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, New York.
Corman, H. H., and Escalona, S. K., 1969, Stages of sensorimotor development: A replication study, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 15: 351–361.
Decarie, T. G., 1965, “Intelligence and Affectivity in Early Childhood,” International Universities Press, New York.
Decarie, T. G., 1969, A study of the mental and emotional development of the thalidomide child, in “Determinants of Infant Behavior” (Vol. 4 ) B. M. Foss (ed.), Methuen, London.
Decarie, T. G., 1973, Perceptual constancy and object permanency, paper presented as part of a symposium on Piagetian approaches to infant development, American Psychological Association, Montreal.
Decarie, T. G., 1974, “The Infant’s Reaction to Strangers,” International Universities Press, New York.
Evans, W. F., 1973, The Stage IV error in Piaget’s theory of object concept development: An investigation of the role of activity, Unpublished dissertation, University of Houston.
Evans, W. F., and Gratch, G., 1972, The Stage IV error in Piaget’s theory of object concept development: Difficulties in object conceptualization or spatial localization?, Child Development 43: 682–688.
Flavell, J. H., 1971, The development of inferences about others, Draft of a paper presented at the Interdisciplinary Conference on Our Knowledge of Persons, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York.
Fletcher, H. J., 1965, The delayed response problem, in “Behavior of nonhuman primates,” (Vol. 1 ) A. M. Schrier, H. F. Harlow, and F. Stollnitz (eds.), Academic Press, New York.
Faiberg, S., Siegel, B. L., and Gibson, R., 1966, The role of sound in the search behavior of a blind infant, Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 21: 327–357.
Freedman, D. A., Fox-Kolenda, B. J., Margileth, D. A., and Miller, D. H., 1969, The development of the use of sound as a guide to affective and cognitive behavior: A two phase process, Child Development 40: 1099–1105.
Gardner, J. K., 1971, The development of object identity in the first six months of human infancy, paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Gibson, J. J., 1966, “The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems,” Houghton-Mifflin, New York.
Ginsburg, H. J., and Wong, D. L., 1973, Enhancement of hidden object search in six month old infants presented with a continuously sounding hidden object, Developmental Psychology 9: 142.
Goulet, J., 1974, The infant’s conception of casuality and his reactions to strangers, in “The Infant’s Reaction to Strangers” T. G. Decarie (ed.), International Universities Press, New York.
Gratch, G., 1972, A study of the relative dominance of vision and touch in six-month old infants, Child Development 43: 615–623.
Gratch, G., 1975, Recent studies based on Piaget’s view of object concept development, in “Infant Perception” L. Cohen and P. Salapatek (eds.), Academic Press, New York.
Gratch, G., and Landers, W. F., 1971, Stage IV of Piaget’s theory of infants’ object concepts, Child Development 42: 359–372.
Gratch, G., Appel, K. J., Evans, W. F., LeCompte, G. K., and Wright, N. A., 1974, Piaget’s Stage 4 object concept error: Evidence of forgetting or object conception?, Child Development 45: 71–77.
Gruber, H. E., Girgus, J. S., and Banuazizi, A., 1971, The development of object permanence in the cat, Developmental Psychology 4: 9–15.
Harris, P. L., 1971, Examination and search in infants, British Journal of Psychology 62: 469–473.
Harris, P. L., 1974, Perseverative search at a visibly empty place by young infants, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18: 535–542.
Huttenlocher, J., 1974, The origins of language comprehension, in “Theories in cognitive psychology” R. L. Solso (ed.), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Potomac, Md.
Huttenlocher, J., 1975, The orogins of language comprehension, in “Theories in cognitive psychology” R. L. Solse (ed. ), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Inhelder, B., Lezine, I., Sindair, H., et Stambak, M., 1972, Les debute de la fonction semiotique, Archives de Psychologie 41 (163): 187–243.
Kagan, J., 1972, Do infants think?, Scientific American 226: 74–82.
Landers, W F., 1971, The effect of differential experience on infants’ performance in a Piagetian Stage IV object-concept task, Developmental Psychology 5: 48–54.
LeCompte, G. K., and Gratch, G., 1972, Violation of a rule as a method of diagnosing infants’ level of object concept, Child Development 43: 385–396.
Lezine, I., Stambak, M., et Casati, I., 1969, “Les étapes de l’intelligence sensori-motrice,” Centre de psychologie appliquée, Paris.
Lester, B. M., Kotelchuck, M., Spelke, E., Sellers, M. J., and Klein, R. E., 1974, Separation protest in Guatemalan infants, Developmental Psychology 10: 79–85.
Mead, G. H., 1938, “The Philosophy of the Act,” University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Meltzoff, Al, 1972, Toward a structural developmental interpretation of separation protest, unpublished honors thesis, Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
Michotte, A., 1955, Perception and cognition, Acta Psychologica 11: 69–91.
Miller, D. G., Cohen, L., and Hill, K. A., 1970, A methodological investigation of Piaget’s theory of object concept development in the sensory motor period, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2: 59–85.
Moore, M. K., 1969, A revision of Piaget’s theory of the development of object permanence: A study of infant search for absent objects, unpublished paper, Harvard University.
Moore, M. K., 1973, The genesis of object permanence, paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Moore, M. K., 1974, The genesis of object permanence, Chapter 1 of unpublished dissertation, Harvard University.
Munn, N. L., 1955, “The Evolution and Growth of Behavior,” Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
Nelson, K. E., 1971, Accommodation of visual tracking patterns in human infants to object movement patterns, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 12: 182–196.
Piaget, J., 1952, “The Origins of Intelligence in Children,” Norton, New York.
Piaget, J., 1954, “The Construction of Reality in the Child,” Basic Books, New York.
Piaget, J., 1969, “The Mechanisms of Perception,” Basic Books, New York.
Roberts, G., and Black, K. N., 1972, The effect of naming and object permanence on toy preferences, Child Development 43: 858–868.
Saal, D., 1974, A study of the development of object concept in infancy by varying the degree of discrepancy between the disappearing and reappearing object, unpublished dissertation proposal, University of Houston.
Scarr, S., and Salapatek, P., 1970, Patterns of fear development during infancy, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 16: 53–90.
Schaffer, H. R., 1971, “The Growth of Sociability,” Penguin, Baltimore.
Schaffer, H. R., Greenwood, A., and Parry, M. H., 1972, The onset of wariness, Child Development 43: 165–175.
Schofield, L., and Uzgiris, I. C., 1969, Examining behavior and the development of the concept of the object, paper presented at the meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Santa Monica, California.
Serifica, P. C., and Uzgiris, I. C., 1971, Infant-mother relationship and object concept, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Shaffran, R., 1974, Modes of approach and the infant’s reaction to the stranger, in “The Infant’s Reaction to Strangers” T. G. Decarie (ed.), International Universities Press, New York.
Smille, D., 1972, Piaget’s constructionist theory, Human Development 15: 171–186.
Uzgiris, I. C., 1973, Patterns of cognitive development in infancy, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 19: 181–204.
Uzgiris, I. C., and Hunt, J. McV., 1974, “Assessment in Infancy, Ordinal Scales of Psychological Development,” University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Vaughter, R. M., Smotherman, W., and Ordy, J. M., 1972, Development of object permanence in the infant squirrel monkey, Developmental Psychology 7: 34–38.
Wise, K. L., Wise, L. A., and Zimmerman, R. R., 1974, Piagetian object permanence in the infant Rhesus monkey, Developmental Psychology 10: 429–437.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gratch, G. (1977). Review of Piagetian Infancy Research. In: Overton, W.F., Gallagher, J.M. (eds) Knowledge and Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2547-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2547-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2549-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2547-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive