Skip to main content

Affinity Partitioning of Receptor-Rich Membrane Fractions and Their Purification

  • Chapter
Surface Membrane Receptors

Abstract

The study of the molecular properties of membrane bound receptors is greatly facilitated by their solubilization and purification. An excellent example of this is the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, which can be solubilized by the use of nonionic detergents and purified by affinity chromatography (15, 20). Initial studies indicated that the binding properties of the nicotinic receptor remain intact in the presence of nonionic detergents. Such fortuitous circumstances do not occur in the study of other receptors. For example, the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor has proved rather labile to treatment with nonionic detergents (7), resulting in considerable loss of binding properties. Even when binding properties of a receptor are intact after solubilization, questions often remain concerning the in situ structure of the receptor and its associated activities. For example, functional coupling between receptor and enzymatic activities and ionophores may be disrupted or altered upon solubilization. Even in the case of the nicotinic receptor, differences in the binding properties of solubilized and membrane bound receptors have been detected (5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. ALBERTSSON, P. A. , Partition of Cell Particles and Macromole-cules, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. ALBERTSSON, P. A., Biochemistry 12 (1973) 2525.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. ALBERTSSON, P. A., Methods in Enzymology 31 (1974) 761.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. CARTAUD, J., BENEDETTI, L. , COHEN, J. B., MEUNIER, J. C. and CHANGEUX, J. P., FEBS Lett. 33 (1973) 109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. COHEN, J. B., WEBER, M., and CHANGEUX, J. P., Mol. Pharmacol. 10 (1974) 904.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DUGUID, J. R. and RAFTERY, M. A. Biochemistry 12 (1973) 3593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. FEWTRELL, C. M. S. and RANG, H. P. in Drug Receptors: A Symposium (H. P. Rang ed.) Macmillan Press, London (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. FLANAGAN, S. D. , Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at San Diego (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. FLANAGAN, S. D. and BARONDES, S. H., J. Biol. Chem. 250 (1975) 1484.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. FLANAGAN, S. D., TAYLOR, P. and BARONDES, S. H. , Nature 254 (1975) 441.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. FLANAGAN, S. D., BARONDES, S. H. and TAYLOR, P. , J. Biol. Chem., (1975) in press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. JOHANSSON, G., HARTMAN, A. and ALBERTSSON, P. A., Eur. J. Biochem. 33 (1973) 379.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. NICHOL, A. and POTTER, L. T., Brain Res. 57 (1973) 508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’CARRA, P. , Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2 (1974) 1289.

    Google Scholar 

  15. OLSEN, R. W., MEUNIER, J. P., and CHANGEUX, J. P., FEBS Lett. 28 (1972) 96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. REED, K., VANDLEN, R., BODE, J., DUGUID, J. and RAFTERY, M. A., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 167 (1975) 138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. REITHERMAN, R., FLANAGAN, S. D. and BARONDES, S. H.,Biochim. Biophys. Acta 297 (1973) 193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. RUTISHAUSER, U., D’ESUTACHIO, P. and EDELMAN, G. M.,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 68 (1973) 2153.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SCHMIDT, J. and RAFTERY, M. A.,Anal. Biochem. 52 (1973) 349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. SCHMIDT, J. and RAFTERY, M. A., Biochemistry 12 (1973) 852.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. SHANBHAG, V. P. and JOHANSSON, G., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 61 (1974) 1141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. TAKERKART, G., SEGARD, E. and MONSIGNY, M., FEBS Lett. 42 (1974) 218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. WALTER, H., Methods in Enzymology 32 (1974) 637.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. WEBER, K., PRINGLE, u. and OSBORN, M., Methods in Enzymoloqy 26 (1972) 3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flanagan, S.D., Barondes, S.H., Taylor, P. (1976). Affinity Partitioning of Receptor-Rich Membrane Fractions and Their Purification. In: Bradshaw, R.A., Frazier, W.A., Merrell, R.C., Gottlieb, D.I., Hogue-Angeletti, R.A. (eds) Surface Membrane Receptors. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 11. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2772-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2772-1_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2774-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2772-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics