Skip to main content

Theories without AB effect Misrepresent the Dynamics of the Electromagnetic Field

  • Chapter
Fundamental Aspects of Quantum Theory

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSB,volume 144))

Abstract

The suggestion by Professor Bocchieri, Professor Loinger, and others1 that the Aharonov-Bohm effect (AB) is not part of quantum mechanics or that it can be removed from quantum mechanics without ruining the theory, is an important one for many reasons. One reason which has perhaps been too little emphasized is that removing AB scattering from the theory would remove the justification for Dirac’s charge quantization law

$$ \frac{{eg}}{c} = \frac{n}{2}\hbar, $$
((1))

where e and g are the elementary units of electric and magnetic charge and n is an integer. In this discussion I shall summarize arguments that have been given in detail elsehwere2,3 to show why AB cannot in fact be removed from the theory except by spoiling the conservation and quantization of angular momentum. It is of course no coincidence that the most general proofs of Dirac’s charge quantization law also rely mainly on the quantization of angular momentum.4 I will not deal with that in this talk, but I will return briefly in an appendix to the relation between AB and Dirac’s original derivation of the charge quantization law from the now-familiar singular strings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Representative statements of that point of view are given by Professor Bocchieri in the previous paper and by W. C. Henneberger in Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 573 (1984), and in references therein. Henneberger’s “AB Scattering”, which he distinguishes from “AB Effect”, is included in my “AB”.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Peshkin, I. Talmi, and L. J. Tassie, Ann. Phys. 16, 177 (1961).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Peshkin, Phys. Rep. 80, 376 (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Lipkin, W. I. Weisberger, and M. Peshkin, Ann. Phys. 53, 203 (1969), and references therein.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Tassie and M. Peshkin, Ann. Phys. 16, 177 (1961).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Nagel, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1144 (1982); and 49, 957 (1982).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A133, 60 (1931).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peshkin, M. (1986). Theories without AB effect Misrepresent the Dynamics of the Electromagnetic Field. In: Gorini, V., Frigerio, A. (eds) Fundamental Aspects of Quantum Theory. NATO ASI Series, vol 144. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5221-1_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5221-1_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5223-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5221-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics