Skip to main content

Critical Analysis of the Methods Used to Identify Generator Sources of Evoked Potential (EP) Peaks

  • Chapter
Advanced Evoked Potentials

Part of the book series: Topics in Neurosurgery ((TINS,volume 2))

Abstract

Optimal use of evoked potentials (EP) for clinical studies requires a good understanding of its generator sources. Numerous methodologies, many of them interrelated and all with significant limitations, have been used to define the generators of evoked potential peaks. In this chapter, we will discuss and analyze critically these different approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achor LJ and Starr A: Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. I. Intracranial and extracranial recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 48:154–173, 1980a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Achor LJ and Starr A: Auditory brain stem responses in the cat. II. Effects of lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 48:174–190, 1980b.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anziska B and Bracco RO: Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials: Studies in patients with focal neurological disease. Electroencephalogr CHn Neurophysiol 49:227–239, 1980a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anziska BJ and Cracco RO: Short latency SEPs to median nerve stimulation: comparison of recording methods and origin of components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 52:531–539, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arezzo J, Legatt AD, and Vaughan HG Jr: Topography and intracranial sources of somatosensory evoked potentials in monkey. I. Early components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 46:155–173, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Asselman P, Chadwick DW, and Marsden CD: Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain 98:261–282, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett G, Blumhardt L, Halliday AM, Halliday E, and Kriss A: paradox in the lateralization of the visual evoked response. Nature (Lond.) 261:253–255, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiappa KH. Utility of lowering click intensity in neurologic applications of brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Presented at Conference on Standards in Clinical BAEP testing, Laguna Beach, California, February 1982 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chiappa KH, Choi S, and Young RR. Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median nerve stimulation in patients with neurological lesions. Prog Clin Neurophysiol, In: J. E. Desmedt (ed) Vol. 7, Karger, Basel, 264–281, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cruse R, Klem G, Lesser RP, Lueders H. Paradoxical lateralization of cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of posterior tibial nerve. Arch Neurol; 39:222–225, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Desmedt JE, Brunko E, and Debecker J. Maturation of the somatosensory evoked potentials in normal infants and children, with special reference to the early N1 component. Electro- cncephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 40:43–58, 1976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Desmedt JE and Noel P. Average cerebral evoked potentials in the evaluation of lesions of the sensory nerves and of the central somatosensory pathway. In: JE Desmedt (ed) New Developments in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 2, Karger, Basel, 352–371, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fukushima T and Mayanagi Y. Neurophysiological examination (SEP) for the objective diagnosis of spinal lesions. In: Klug W, Brock M, Klager M, and Spoerri O (eds) Advances in Neurosurgery, Vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 158–168, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ciiblin DR. Somatosensory evoked potentials in healthy subjects and in patients with lesions of the nervous system. Ann NY Acad Sci 112:93–142, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Halliday AM and Wakefield GS: Cerebral evoked potentials in patients with dissociated sensory loss. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 26:211–219, 1963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hecox K and Galambos R: Brain stem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Arch Otolaryngol 99:30–33, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Larson SJ, Sances A, and Christenson PC: Evoked somatosensory potentials in man. Arch Neurol (Chicago) 15:88–93, 1966b.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorente de No R: A study of nerve: physiology studies from the Rockefeller Institute 132, Chapter 16, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lüders H: The effects of aging on the wave form of the somatosensory cortical evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 29:450–460, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lüders H, Lesser R, Gurd A, and Klein G: Recovery functions of spinal cord and subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials to posterior tibial nerve stimulation: intrasurgical recordings. Brain Res 309:27–34, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lüders H, Lesser RP, Dinner DS, Morris HH, and Klem G: Ipsilateral somatosensory evoked potentials recorded directly from the human cortex. 11th International Congress of EEG and C’linical Neurophysiology, London 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lüders H, Lesser RP, Hahn J, Little J, and Klem G: Subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve Stimulation. Brain 106:341–372, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MacCabee PJ, Hassan NF, Cracco RA, and Schiff J: Short latency somatosensory and spinal evoked potential: power spectra and comparison between high pan analog and digital filter. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1986 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maguière F, Brunon AM, Echallier JF, and Courjon J: Early somatosensory evoked potentials in lesions of the lemniscal pathway in humans. In: J Courjon, F Maguière and M Revol (eds), Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology, Raven press. New York, 321–338, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Namerow NS: Somatosensory evoked responses following cervical cordotomy. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc 34:184–188, 1969.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Noel P and Desmedt JE: Somatosensory cerebral evoked potentials after vascular lesions of the brain stem and diencephalon. Brain 98:113–128, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Noel P and Desmedt JE: Cerebral and far-field somatosensory evoked potentials in neurological disorders involving the cerevical spinal cord, brainstem, thalamus and cortex. Prog Clin Neurophysiol 7:205–230, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Powell TPS: Residual neurons in the human thalamus following decortication. Brain 75:571–584, 1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson K and Rudge P: The early components of the auditory evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Auditory Evoked Potentials in Man. Psychopharmacology Correlates of EP’s. Progress Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 2, Karger, Basel, 58–67, 1977a.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rowe MJ III: Normal variabihty of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44:459–470, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Russell GV: Histologic alterations in thalamic nuclei of man followmg cortical lesions. Texas Rep Biol Med 16:483–492, 1958.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wiederholt WC: Recovery function of short latency components of surface and depth recorded somatosensory evoked potentials in the cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45:259–267, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Williamson PD, Goff WR, and Allison T: Somatosensory evoked responses in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 28:566–575, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yamada T, Muroga T, and Kimura J: Tourniquet-induced ischemia and somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurology 31:1524–1529, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lüders, H., Lesser, R.P., Dinner, D.S., Morris, H.H., Wyllie, E. (1989). Critical Analysis of the Methods Used to Identify Generator Sources of Evoked Potential (EP) Peaks. In: Lüders, H. (eds) Advanced Evoked Potentials. Topics in Neurosurgery, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9007-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9007-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9009-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9007-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics