Skip to main content

Classification Systems

  • Chapter
Family Medicine
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

Francois Bossier de Lacroix (1706–1777) has been credited with the first systematic classification of diseases, published under the title of Nosologalia Methodica. Important additional early contributions to the science of nosology came from William Farr (1807–1883) and Mark d’Espine, who created classifications and used them for statistical purposes. Jacques Bertillon (1851–1922) produced the Bertillon classification of causes of death, which eventually became the basis for what is now known as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Beginning with the first revision in 1900, subsequent revisions have been produced at approximately 10-year intervals. The most current is the ninth revision (ICD-9),1 published in 1979. It has been modified for use in the United States as the International Classification of Diseases—Ninth Revision—Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM).2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ninth revision international classification of diseases. In: Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ninth Revision International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, ICD-9. Report of the Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eighth revision international classification of diseases. In: Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Westbury RC, Tarrant M: Classification of diseases in general practice: a comparative study. Can Med Assoc J 101: 603–608, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A classification of disease: report of the Research Committee of the Royal College of General Practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract 2:140–159, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coded Classification of Diseases: A Problem-Oriented Adaptation of the Royal College of General Practitioners Classification. Rochester, NY, University of Rochester and Highland Hospital Family Medicine Program, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care. Report of the Classification Committee of the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians. Chicago, American Hospital Association, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ICHPPC-2: International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care, 1979 Revision. Report of the Classification Committee of the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Becker LA, Boyle RM, Froom J, Schneeweiss R, Wood M: A conversion code from ICHPPC-1 to ICHPPC-2. J Fam Pract 12: 707–719, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Froom J, Schneeweiss MB: Use of the international classification of health problems in primary care (ICHPPC2) for reimbursement. J Fam Pract 11: 609, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eimerl TS, Laidlaw AJ: A Handbook for Research in General Practice. London, Livingstone, 1969, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  12. An International Glossary for Primary Care. Report of the Classification Committee of the World Organization of National Colleges, Academies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physician (WONCA) J Fam Pract 13: 671–681, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Department of Health Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Health Resources Administration, National Center for Health Statistics: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: Symptom Classification. DHEW Publication HRA 74–1337. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Health Resources Administration, National Center for Health Statistics: National Health Survey: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1973 Summer. DHEW Publication HRA 1772. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Finkel AJ, Gordon BL, Fanta CM, Harris DK, Polli GJ (eds): Physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology, ed. 4. Chicago, American Medical Association, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tindall HL, Culpepper L, Froom J, Henderson RA, Richards AD, Rosser WW, Wiegert T: The NAPCRG process classification for primary care. J Fam Pract 12: 309–318, 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones EJ: Patient Classification for Long-Term Care: User’s Manual. DHEW Publication HRA 74–3107. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Froom, J. (1983). Classification Systems. In: Taylor, R.B. (eds) Family Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4002-8_123

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4002-8_123

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-4004-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4002-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics