Skip to main content

Explanation and Description in Traditional Neobehaviorism, Cognitive Psychology, and Behavior Analysis

  • Chapter
Behavior Theory and Philosophy

Abstract

Reese (1999) has noted that the nature of explanation and its relation to description have been hotly debated for many years. The present chapter critically examines the status of explanation and description in contemporary behavioral science, particularly traditional neobehaviorism, cognitive psychology, and behavior analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bacon, F. (1937). De dignitate et augmentis scientarium. In R. F. Jones (Ed. and trans.), Essays, Advancement of Learning, New Atlantis, and other pieces (pp. 377–438). New York: Odyssey. (Original work published 1623.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, F.(1960). The new organon. (F. H. Anderson, Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. ( Original work published 1620 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1993). The unconventional philosophy of science of behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 449–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C., & Hamad, S. (Eds.). (1988). The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and controversies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copi, I. (1982). Introduction to logic (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (1983). The nature of psychological explanation. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1981). The mind-body problem.Scientific American, 244, 124–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hergenhahn, B. R. (1997). An introduction to the history of psychology (3 rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hineline, P. N. (1984). Can a statement in cognitive terms be a behavior-analytic interpretation? The Behavior Analyst, 7, 97–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1937). Mind, mechanism, and adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 44, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1964). A treatise of human nature. (L. A. Selby-Brigge, Ed., reprinted). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Earlier edition published 1888 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1902). Enquiries concerning the human understanding and concerning the principles of morals. (L. A. Selby-Brigge, Ed., 2nd ed). Oxford: Clarendon Press. ( Original work published 1777 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, H. H., & Spence, J. T. (1971). Tenets of neobehaviorism. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.), Essays in Neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence (pp. 11–40 ). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–146 ). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E. (1942). The science of mechanics (T. J. McCormack, Trans.; 5th ed.). LaSalle, IL: Open Court. ( Original work published 1883 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, M. J. (1983). Memory: Metaphors and models. Psychological Record, 33, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, M. J. (1985). ‘Tis the gift to be simple: A retrospective appreciation of Mach’s The Science of Mechanics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,44,129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1984). On behaviorism, knowledge, and causal explanation. Psychological Record, 34, 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1990a). On mentalism, privacy, and behaviorism. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1990b). On the “causes”of behavior. Psychological Record, 40,469480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1992). On private events and theoretical terms. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 13, 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1996). On the relation between behaviorism and cognitive psychology. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17, 345–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1998). On behaviorism, theories, and hypothetical constructs. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 19, 215–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (2000a). Behavior analysis and psycholinguistics. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 1, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (2000b). Varieties of scientific explanation. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 173–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J. C. (Ed.). (1988). Theories of explanation. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, H. W. (1999). Explanation is not description. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 8(1), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D. (Ed.). (1938). Aristotle: Selections. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1932). Mysticism and logic. London: George Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaitter, R. M. (1984). Skinner on the “mental” and the “physical.” Behaviorism, 12, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaitter, R. (1986). Behavior as a function of inner states and outer circumstances. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 247–274 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoneberger, T. (2000). A departure from Cognitivism: Implications of Chomsky’s second revolution in linguistics. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17,57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1992). What is an “explanation” of behavior? Psychological Science, 3, 150161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1972). Experimental psychology. Cumulative record (pp. 295–313). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Reprinted from Current trends in psychology, pp. 16–49, by W. Dennis, Ed., 1947, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1964). Behaviorism at fifty. In T. W. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology (pp. 79–108 ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1978). Reflections on behaviorism and society. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1989). The origins of cognitive thought. American Psychologist, 44, 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of mind? American Psychologist, 45, 1206–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. D. (1995). Inquiry nearer the source: Bacon, Mach, and The Behavior of Organisms. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on B. F. Skinner and contemporary behaviorism (pp. 39–50 ). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E., & Tooley, M. (Eds.). (1993). Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R. (1973). On the notion of cause, with application to behaviorism. Behaviorism, 1, 25–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R. (2001). The new behaviorism. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. B. (1967). Philosophy and the science of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessells, M. (1981). A critique of Skinner’s views on the explanatory inadequacy of cognitive theories. Behaviorism, 9, 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessells, M. (1982). A critique of Skinner’s views on the obstructive character of cognitive theories. Behaviorism, 10, 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. A. (1972). Causality and scientific explanation (Vol. 1 ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. A. (1974). Causality and scientific explanation (Vol. 2 ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moore, J. (2003). Explanation and Description in Traditional Neobehaviorism, Cognitive Psychology, and Behavior Analysis. In: Lattal, K.A., Chase, P.N. (eds) Behavior Theory and Philosophy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4590-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4590-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3405-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4590-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics