Abstract
A maxim is a simple, universally accepted truth. For example, in medicine there is a maxim: “Above all do no harm”; in economics: “There is no free lunch”; in literature: “In the beginning was the word”; and in rehabilitation one might say: “Do what you have to do to optimize the functioning of the patient,” with a proviso of “Do not violate the other maxims.” If one does no harm, tries to make a citizen with a handicap a productive taxpayer or relieve someone of a burden that hopefully can be translated in economic terms, and writes a clean report to a third-party payer, then all participants will be happy: the patient, the sponsoring agency, and the provider of services. But if one should stray from any one of these maxims, then one of the parties in rehabilitation will be offended and trouble follows.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1993). A theory of rehabilitation without a model of learning is a vehicle without an engine: A comment on Caramazza and Hillis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 3, 235–244.
Berkowitz, E. (1991). The federal government and the emergence of rehabilitation medicine. The Historian, 43, 530–544.
Caplan, A. L., Callahan, D., & Haas, J. (1987). Ethical and policy issues in rehabilitation medicine. A Hastings Center Report: Special supplement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 7–20.
Cervelli, L. (1997). The missing link; structured dialogue between payer and provider communities on the costs and benefits of medical rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78 ( Suppl. S3 ), S36 - S38.
Corrigan, J. D., Smith-Knapp, K., & Granger, C. V. (1997). Validity of the Functional Independence Measure for persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 828–834.
deLateur, B. J. (1997) Quality of life; a patient centered outcome. The 29th Walter J. Zeiter Lecture. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 3 (78), 237–239.
Diller, L. (1990). Fostering the interdisciplinary team, fostering research in a society in transition. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 275–278.
Diller, L., Goodgold, J., & Kay, T. (1989). Final report to NIDRR for the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center in Head Trauma and Stroke. New York: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine New York University Medical Center.
Dittmar, S. S., & Gresham, G. E. (1997). Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health health professional. Frederick, MD: Aspen.
Duggan, C. H., Djikers, M., Tate, D., & Heinrich, R. (1997). Quality of life of persons with spinal cord injuries; an analysis based on personal narrative. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 910.
Evans, R. W. (1997). Postacute neurorehabilitation; Roles and responsibilities within a national information system. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, (Suppl. 4), 17–25.
Frederickson, N., & Cannon, N. L. (1995). The role of the rehabilitation physician in the postacute continuum. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 17–51.
Fuhrer, M. J., Rentala, D. H., Hart, K. A. Clearman, R., & Young, M. E. (1992), Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 73, 552–557.
Gelfman, R., Peters, J., Opitz, J. L., & Folz, T. J. (1997). The history of physical medicine and rehabilitation as recorded in the diary of DR Frank Krusen: Part 3. Consolidating the position (1948–1953). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 556–561.
Haas, J. F. (1988). Admission to rehabilitation centers: Selection of patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 329–332.
Hoyer, T. (1998). Quoted in “Say goodbye to functional related groups, hello to MDS and RUGS.” Rehabilitation Continuum Report, 7, 1.
Keith, R. A. (1991). The comprehensive treatment team in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 269–274.
Keith, R. A. (1997). Treatment strength in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 1298–1304.
Keith, R. A., Wilson, D. B., & Guitierrez, P. (1995). Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: A comparison. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 495–500.
Malec, J. F., & Basford, J. S. (1996). Postacute brain injury rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 198–207.
Opitz, J. L., Folz, T. J., Peters, J., & Gelfman, R. (1997). The history of physical medicine and rehabilitation as recorded in the diaries of Frank Krusen: Part 1: Gathering momentum (the years before 1942). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 442–445.
Reilly, T. A. (1997). Management dilemmas in rehabilitation today. Rehabilitation Outlook, 2, 2–4.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1996). Science as an ally of practice. American Psychologist, 51, 1072–1079.
Webb, C. D., Wrigley, M., Yoels, W., & Fine, P. (1995). Explaining quality of life for persons with traumatic brain injuries 2 years after brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 1113–1118.
Wilson, B. A. (1997). Cognitive rehabilitation: How it is and how it might be. Journal of International Neuropsychology Society, 3, 487–496
Wong, E. H. (1997). How to avoid an adversarial alliance with families in acute brain injury rehabilitation: Simple guidelines from clinical observations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 945–948.
Zarin, D. A., Pincus, H. A., West, J. C., & McIntyre, J. S. (1997). Practiced based research in psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154 (9), 1199–1208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Diller, L. (2000). Cognitive Rehabilitation During the Industrialization of Rehabilitation. In: Christensen, AL., Uzzell, B.P. (eds) International Handbook of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Critical Issues in Neuropsychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5569-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5569-5_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3324-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5569-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive