Skip to main content

Maternal Health Innovations and Urbanization

  • Chapter
Innovating for Healthy Urbanization

Abstract

In 2014, nearly 300,000 women around the world will die from causes attributable to pregnancy and childbirth. An estimated 99 % of these maternal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Most of these maternal deaths are caused by postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), infection, unsafe abortion, eclampsia, and obstructed labor. In stark contrast, in well-resourced settings, complications of pregnancy can usually be prevented or addressed successfully without death or disability to the mother (Maternal Mortality [Internet]. WHO; 2012 May [cited 2014 January 01]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/). The major determinants of this enormous disparity in maternal survival are social, economic, and physical barriers to accessing quality healthcare.

The term “urban health advantage” refers to the general observation that health indices in urban settings are often better than in rural areas due to physical proximity of healthcare facilities. However, with close examination, it is clear that the degree of poverty is more predictive of access to healthcare than actual geographic distance between patients and healthcare facilities (Gabrysch and Campbell, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9:34, 2009). Despite proximity, the urban poor often have limited access to healthcare and receive lower quality services because of their inability to pay (Harpham, Health Place 15:107–116, 2009; Matthews et al., PLoS Med 7(9):e1000327, 2010). Additionally, the urban poor in high-density settings often suffer from low-quality public and private healthcare services, consequently disincentivizing desirable prevention and care-seeking behaviors of the population.

Novel, low-cost solutions are required in order to overcome the challenges unique to the growing phenomenon of global urbanization. This chapter will provide an overview of promising innovations in maternal health via two themes: (1) increasing mothers’ access to care, discussed in relation to the “Three Delays Model” (Thaddeus and Maine, 38:8, 1994), and (2) improving quality of maternal healthcare, with a particular focus on addressing the major causes of global maternal mortality. In time, these innovations and others may become long-term solutions or may be replaced by new ideas. The innovations described in this chapter are examples of what is indeed possible with fresh and creative approaches that are focused on saving the lives of our future mothers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Business Call to Action was created by the United Nations in 2008 and supported by multiple international donor agencies with “aims to accelerate progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by challenging companies to develop inclusive business models that offer the potential for both commercial success and development impact.” (http://www.businesscalltoaction.org)

  2. 2.

    Authors of this book chapter are all affiliated with the Massachusetts General Hospital.

References

  1. Maternal Mortality [Internet]. WHO; 2012 May [cited 2014 January 01]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/

  2. Gabrysch S, Campbell O. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harpham T. Urban health in developing countries: what do we know and where do we go? Health Place. 2009;15:107–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matthews Z, Channon A, Neal S, Osrin D, Madise N, et al. Examining the “urban advantage” in maternal health care in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000327.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Combs Thorsen V, Sundby J, Malata A. Piecing together the maternal death puzzle through narratives: the three delays model revisited. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52090.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McTavish S, Moore S, Harper S, Lynch J. National female literacy, individual socio-economic status, and maternal health care use in sub-Saharan Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(11):1958–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarez JL, Gil R, Hernandez V, Gil A. Factors associated with maternal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa: an ecological study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:462.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simkhada B, Teijlingen ER, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61:244–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell OMR, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368:1284–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mobile Phone Access Reaches Three Quarters of Planet’s Population [Internet]. The World Bank Group; 2012 July 17 [cited 2014 Jan 14]. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2012/07/17/mobile-phone-access-reaches-three-quarters-planets-population

  12. Mechael PH. The case for mHealth in developing countries. Innovations. 2009;4(1):103–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tameat T, Kachnowski S. Special delivery: an analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Maternal Child Health J. 2012;16:1092–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Speciale AM, Freytsis M. mHealth for midwives: a call to action. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58:76–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Noordam AC, Kuepper BM, Stekelenburg J, Milen A. Improvement of maternal health services through the use of mobile phones. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16(5):622–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. LifeSpring Hospitals: Providing Affordable, High-quality Healthcare [Internet]. Business Call to Action; 2010 June [cited on 2014 January 14]. http://www.businesscalltoaction.org/members/2010/08/lifespring-hospitals/

  17. Zambulance [Internet]. Zambikes; 2013 [cited 2014 January 14]. http://zambikes.org/why_zambulance/

  18. The Project [Internet]. Bambulance; 2008 [cited 2014 January 14]. http://plippo.com/client/bambulance/project.html

  19. GUHUZA—Connecting mothers to health care through group SMS [Internet]. Saving Lives at Birth Grand Challenge for Development; 2012 August 06 [cited 2014 January 14]. http://savinglivesatbirth.net/summaries/2012/169

  20. World Health Organization, PEPFAR, and UNAIDS. Task shifting: rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams. 2008. http://www.who.int/healthsystems/TTR-TaskShifting.pdf

  21. Pathmanathan I, et al. Investing in maternal health: learning from Malaysia and Sri Lanka. Human Development Network: Health, Nutrition, and Population Series (31 December 2003). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  22. MacArthur C. Traditional birth attendant training for improving health behaviours and pregnancy outcomes: RHL commentary (last revised: 1 June 2009). The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maama Kit: Making childbirth clean and safer. WHO, Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  24. About ColaLife [Internet].Colalife; 2014 [cited on 2014 January 14]. http://www.colalife.org/about/colalife-about/

  25. Leading and underlying causes of maternal mortality [internet]. Unicef; 2014 [cited on 2014 January 1]. http://www.unicef.org/wcaro/overview_2642.html

  26. Mbizvo MT, Fawcus S, Lindmark G, Nystrom L. Maternal mortality in rural and urban Zimbabwe: social and reproductive factors in an incident case-referent study. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(9):1197–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson JM, Etches D. Prevention and management of postpartum hemorrhage. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(6):875–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nelson BD, Stoklosa H, Ahn R, Eckardt MJ, Walton EK, Burke TF. Use of uterine balloon tamponade for control of postpartum hemorrhage by community-based health providers in South Sudan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;122(1):27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller S, Bergel EF, El Ayadi AM, Gibbons L, Butrick EA, Magwali T, Mkumba G, Kaseba C, Huong NT, Geissler JD, Merialdi M. Non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG), a first-aid device to decrease maternal mortality from obstetric hemorrhage: a cluster randomized trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Monash University. Inhaled oxytocin team wins prestigious Australian Innovation Challenge. 2 December 2013. http://www.monash.edu.au/pharm/about/news/archive/2013/australian-innovators.html. Accessed 31 Mar 2014.

  31. Dellinger R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guideline for management of severe septic and septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1160–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaseman T, Bourbour J, Schuler DA. Validation of the efficacy of a solar-thermal powered autoclave system for off-grid medical instrument wet sterilization. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87(4):602–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chandler DL. “Sterilizing with the Sun.” MIT News. 26 February 2013. http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2013/sterilizing-with-the-sun-0226.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2014.

  34. Faundes A. Unsafe abortion—the current global scenario. Best Practice Res Clin Obstetric Gynecol. 2010;24:467–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. 1, Safe abortion care: the public health and human rights rationale. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138200/

  36. Adler AJ, Filippi V, Thomas SL, Ronsmans C. Quantifying the global burden of morbidity due to unsafe abortion: magnitude in hospital-based studies and methodological issues. Int J Gynecol Obstetrics. 2012;118(2):65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Population Services International. Ligne Verte Hotline: Using cell phones to increase access to family planning information in the Democratic Republic of Congo. January 19, 2010. http://www.psi.org/resources/research-metrics/publications/conference-presentation/ligne-verte-hotline-using-cell-phone

  38. Dao B, et al. Is Misoprostol a safe, effective and acceptable alternative to manual vacuum aspiration for postabortion care? Results from a randomized trail in Burkina Faso, West Africa. BJOG, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shwekerela B, et al. Misoprostol for treatment of incomplete abortion at the regional hospital level: results from Tanzania. BJOG. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Emergency Obstetric Care [Internet]. United Nations Population Fund; 2014 [cited 2014 January 14]. http://www.unfpa.org/public/cache/offonce/home/mothers/pid/4385;jsessionid=BB3BABE60A1A812D20C84071B99F3729.jahia02

  41. Managing Eclampsia [Internet]. World Health Organization & International Confederation of Midwives; 2008. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241546669_2_eng.pdf

  42. Larson NF. Congo red dot urine test can predict, diagnose preeclampsia. Medscape Medical News, February 9, 2010. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/716741. Accessed 12 Jan 2014.

  43. Pre-eclampsia sensing strip [Internet]. Maternal and neonatal directed assessment of technology; 2014. http://mnhtech.org/technology/technologies-in-development/ pre-eclampsia-sensing-strip/

  44. Dolea C, AbouSahr C. Global burden of obstructed labour in the year 2000. In Global Burden of Disease 2000.World Health Organization, November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Groom KM, Jones BA, Miller N, Paterson-Brown S. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventuous cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2006;113:183–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Attilakos G, Sibanda T, Winter C, Johnson N, Draycott T. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device. BJOG. 2005;112:1510–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. The World Health Organization Odon Device Research Group. Feasibility and safety study of a new device (Odon device) for assisted vaginal deliveries: study protocol. Reprod Health. 2013;10:33.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Requejo JH, Belizan JM. Odon device: a promising tool to facilitate vaginal delivery and increase access to emergency care. Reprod Health. 2013;10:42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melody Eckardt M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.O.G. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eckardt, M. et al. (2015). Maternal Health Innovations and Urbanization. In: Ahn, R., Burke, T., McGahan, A. (eds) Innovating for Healthy Urbanization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7597-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7597-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7596-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7597-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics