Skip to main content

Recess in Primary School: The Disjuncture Between Educational Policy and Scientific Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Justice, Conflict and Wellbeing

Abstract

In recent decades, the role of recess during the school day has been called into question. This chapter addresses the critical issue of whether recess adds value to education by describing research examining the effects of recess on development and achievement. This topic is of critical importance for educational settings and wellbeing: To ensure the best practices are being utilized, school policies should be based on scientific investigations. Thus, research examining recess and play is described.

In this chapter, we begin with a description of how recess has changed over history, highlighting the erosion of recess time. Those in favor of reducing or eliminating recess argue that it is unnecessary. Another argument for reducing recess is that its reduction maximizes instructional time, which enables students to reach academic standards. Other arguments for reducing or eliminating recess time are described, such as the perceived increases in achievement, decreases in bullying, and the potential benefits of replacing recess with physical education.

Next, we describe arguments and research supporting the inclusion of recess. This begins with examining theories of classic scholars. We then examine scientific studies investigating how recess and play benefit children by helping prepare them for adulthood, increasing wellbeing (e.g., physical fitness), improving classroom behavior, and enhancing social competence. Next, we describe research that links recess and play to cognition and academic success, which is further supported by research on massed versus distributed practice. Finally, developmental theory and empirical investigations suggest that younger children demonstrate greater benefit from recess and are less reliable test takers, considerations that should be taken into account when making policy decisions.

Overall, research documents that routinely providing recess is beneficial for students, especially young children. In contrast, arguments in favor of reducing or eliminating recess do not appear to be based in research. Thus, the chapter proffers the argument that theories and empirical research should guide policies and decisions about the inclusion of recess. Given the current scientific evidence available, recess should be a regular part of the school day.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We acknowledge Ithel Jones for providing these data.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The excercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, R. M., Silver, E. J., & Stein, R. E. K. (2009). School recess and group classroom behavior. Pediatrics, 123, 431–436. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P. P. G. (1981). Discontinuities in development and changes in the organization of play in cats. In K. Immelmann, G. Barlow, L. Petrinovich & M. Main (Eds.), Behavioral development (pp. 281–295). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P. P. G. (2005). The role of play in the evolution of great apes and humans. In A. D. Pellegrini & P. K. Smith (Eds.), The nature of play: Great apes and humans (pp. 13–26). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, D. (1998). Play as a medium for learning and development: A handbook of theory and practice. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. C., & Curtis, M. (2001). Play today in the primary playground. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F. (2004). Children’s thinking: Developmental function and individual differences (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Brown, R. D. (1998). Physical play and cognitive development: Integrating activity, cognition, and education. Child Development, 69, 604–606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06229.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Green, B. L. (1992). The adaptive nature of cognitive immaturity. American Psychologist, 47, 46–54. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Harnishfeger, K. K. (1990). The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review, 10, 48–71. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(90)90004-N.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2000). Child development and evolutionary psychology. Child Development, 71, 1687–1708. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Evolutionary developmental psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, K. (2005). Schools pressured to cut recess: Instructional needs mean less time for kids to play. Arizona Republic. Retrieved 1 June, 2013 from http://www.azcentral.com/families/education/articles/0512recess12.html.

  • Blatchford, P., & Sumpner, C. (1998). What do we know about breaktime? Results from a national survey of breaktime and lunchtime in primary and secondary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 24, 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., & Walker, K. C. (1997). The utility of intelligence tests for preschool children. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 484–502). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., Howell, K. K., & Harrison, T. E. (1991). Ipsative subtest pattern stability of the Bracken basic concept scale and the Kaufman assessment battery for children in a preschool sample. School Psychology Review, 20, 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. (1988). Precocity, play, and the ectotherm-endotherm transition. In E. Blass (Ed.), Handbook of behavrioal neurobilogy, (Vol. 9, pp. 107–148). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP). (2010). The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Damon, W. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In Nieisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Social, emotional, and personality development, (5th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 779–862). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Physical Education and Children (CPEC). (2001). Recess in elementary schools: A position paper of the Council on Physical Education for Children and the National Association for Sport and Physical Education. Reston: National Association for Sport and Physical Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Validity. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 443–507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, D., Corbin, C. B., & Dale, K. (2000). Restricting opportunities to be active during school time: Do children compensate by increasing physical activity levels after school? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 240–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627–634. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.8.627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dills, A. K., Morgan, H. N., & Rotthoff, K. W. (2011). Recess, physical education, and elementary school student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 30, 889–900. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.04.011. ISSN: 0272-7757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etnier, J. L., Salazar, W., Landers, D. M., Petruzzello, S. J., Han, M., & Nowell, P. (1997). The influence of physical fitness and exercise upon cognitive functioning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 249–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1997). Surplus energy theory: An enduruing but inadequate justification for school breaktime. Educational Review, 49, 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagen, R. (1981). Animal play behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerstrom, T., & Mahoney, K. (2006). Give me a break! Can strategic recess scheduling increase on-task behavior for first-graders? Ontario Action Researcher, 9, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedewa, A. L., & Ahn, S. (2011). The effects of physical activity and physical fitness on children’s achievement and cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 521–535. doi:10.5641/027013611x13275191444107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, G. (1979). Echoes from the nursery: Piaget, Vygotsky, and the relationship between language and play. In E. Winner & H. Gardner (Eds.), Fact, fiction, and fantasy in childhood (pp. 1–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119, 182–191. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Great cultural revolution in progress: Workers’ Mao Tse-Tung’s thought propaganda teams in colleges and schools. (1968). Peking Review, 11, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnishfeger, K. K., & Pope, R. (1996). Intending to forget: The development of cognitive inhibition in directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 292–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartle, L., Campbell, J., becker, A., Harman, C., Kagel, S., & Tiballi, B. (1994). Outdoor play: A window on social-cognitive development. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 23, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W., & Laursen, B. (1993). Conflict and context in peer relations. In C. H. Hart (Ed.), Children on playgrounds: Research perspectives and applications (pp. 44–84). Albany: State Universtiy of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, C. H., Erickson, K. I., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Be smart, exercise your heart: Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Science and Society, 9, 58–65. doi:10.1038/nrn2298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R. M., Pellegrini, A. D., & Schmidt, S. L. (2006). The effects of different recess timing regimens on preschoolers’ classroom attention. Early Child Development and Care, 176, 735–743. doi:10.1080/03004430500207179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. (1994). Owner’s manual for the brain. Austin: Leornian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. (1895). Tom Brown’s school days. Cambridge: The Riverside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1939). Homo ludens. Amsterdam: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, R., & Raines, S. (1991). An analysis of the oral language production of young children participating in three types of play centers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5, 140–146. doi:10.1080/02568549109594811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jambor, T. (1994). School recess and social development. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 23, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1901). Talks to teachers on psychology: And to students on some of life’s ideals. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, O. (2002). Recess in elementary school: What does the research say? Champaign: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, O. S., & Duckett-Hedgebeth, M. (2003). Recess in middle school: What do the students do? In O. S. Jarrett & M. Duckett-Hedgebeth (Eds.), Play and educational theory and practice (pp. 227–241). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, O. S., & Maxwell, D. M. (2000). What research says about the need for recess. In R. Clements (Ed.), Elementary school recess: Selected readings, games, and activities for teachers and parents (pp. 12–23). Lake Charles: American Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, O. S., & Maxwell, D. M. (2005). Physical education and recess: Are both necessary? Retrieved 15 May, 2013 from www.southfayette.org/bohn/recess.html.

  • Jarrett, O. S., Maxwell, D. M., Dickerson, C., Hoge, P., Davies, G., & Yetley, A. (1998). Impact of recess on classroom behavior: Group effects and individual differences. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 121–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, O. S., & Waite-Stupiansky. (2009). Recess—It’s indespensible! Young Children, 64, 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. (1998). Many schools putting an end to child’s play. New York Times, A1, A16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, T. F., Stafford, F., & Ono, H. (2004). Major changes have taken pace in how children and teens spend their time: Child development supplement. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D., Wiley, J., & Phillips, L. (1990). Adult age differences in memory for massed and distributed actions. Psychology and Aging, 5, 530–534. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.4.530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (2006). Recess in jeopardy? Media General News Service. Retrieved 15 May, 2013 from http://washdateline.magnetwork.com/index.cfm?SiteID=wsh&PackageID=46&fuseaction=article.main&ArticleID=8086&GroupID=214.

  • Klein, R., & Armitage, R. (1979). Rhythms in human performance: 1 1/2-hour oscillations in cognitive style. Science, 204, 1326–1327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, R. E. (1989). Children at play: Behavior of children at recess. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 60, 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1996). Friendship quality as a predictor of young children’s early school adjustment. Child Development, 67, 1103–1118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01785.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., Price, J., & Hart, L. (1988). Predicting preschoolers’ peer status from their playground behavior. Child Development, 59, 986–992. doi:10.2307/1130265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorsbach, T.C., & Reimer, J. F. (1997). Developmental changes in the inhibition of previously relevant information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 317–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1906). Capital: A critique of political economy. New York: The Modern Libary, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1983). Assessment of children. In W. Kessen (Ed.), History, theories, and methods (4th ed., pp. 477–526). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, R. J. (2000). Issues in preschool assessment. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (3rd ed., pp. 19–32). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Sport and Physical Education, & American Heart Association. (2010). 2010 shape of the nation report: Status of physical education in the USA. Reston: National Association for Sport and Physical Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Calories in, calories out: Food and exercise in public elementary schools, 2005. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Time for Play. (2001). The Economist, 35. Retrieved 15 April, 2013 from http://www.ed.gov/programs/edresearch/applicant.html.

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (1991). Kindergarten children’s social cognitive status as a predictor of first grade success. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 565–577. doi:10.1016/0885-2006(92)90099-K.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (1992). Preference for outdoor play during early adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 15, 241–254. doi:10.1016/0140-1971(92)90028-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). School recess and playground behavior: Educational and developmental roles. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (2005). Recess: Its role in education and development. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (2009). Research and policy on children’s play. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 131–136. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00092.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1996). The place of recess in school: Issues in the role of recess in children’s education and development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 11, 5–13. doi:10.1080/02568549609594691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1997). The role of recess in children’s cognitive performance. Educational Psychologist, 32, 35–40. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3201_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bohn, C. M. (2005). The role of recess in children’s cognitive performance and school adjustment. Educational Researcher, 34, 13–19. doi:10.3102/0013189x034001013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Davis, P. D. (1993). Relations between children’s playground and classroom behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 88–95. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01043.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Galda, L. (1982). The effects of thematic fantasy play training on the development of children’s story comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 443-452. doi:10.3102/00028312019003443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Glickman, C. D. (1989). The educational role of recess. Principal, 68, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Holmes, R. M. (2006). The role of recess in primary school. In A. D. Pellegrini & R. M. Holmes (Eds.), Play = Learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 36–53). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., Horvat, M., & Huberty, P. D. (1998). The relative cost of children’s physical activity play. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1053–1061. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., Huberty, P. D., & Jones, I. (1995). The effects of recess timing on children’s playground and classroom behaviors. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 845–864. doi:10.3102/00028312032004845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (1993). School Recess: Implications for education and development. Review of Educational Research, 63, 51–67. doi:10.3102/00346543063001051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (1998). Physical activity play: The nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Development, 69, 577-598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06226.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: History, theories, and methods (pp. 103–128). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recess: An issue of academic needs vs. social and emotional values. (1991, October 27). Pittsburgh Press, p. A9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. S., & Sawyers, J. K. (1988). Play in the lives of children. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J., & Rowe, K. (1992). The relationship between inattentiveness in the classroom and reading achievement: Part B: An explanatory study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 357–368. doi:10.1097/00004583-199203000-00026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1931/1959). The scientific outlook. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1932/1972). In praise of idleness and other essays. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, R. (2005). The end of recess. District Administration, 41, 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schools becoming all work and no play. (2001). The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 72, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, B. A., & Etnier, J. L. (2003). The relationship between physical activity and cognition in children: A meta-analysis. Pediactric Exercise Science, 9, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. (1991). Children’s thinking (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons-Morton, B. G., O’Hara, N. M., Simons-Morton, D. G., & Parcel, G. (1987). Children and fitness: A public health perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K. (1988). Children’s play and its role in early development: A re-evaluation of the ‘play ethos’. In A. D. Pellegrini (Ed.), Psychological bases for early education. Wiley series in developmental psychology and its applications. (pp. 207–226). Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Boulton, M. (1990). Rough-and tumble play, aggression and dominance: Perception and behaviour in children’s enocounters. Human Development, 33, 271–282. doi:10.1159/000276524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Connolly, K. J. (1980). The ecology of preschool behaviour. West Nyack: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Dodsworth, C. (1978). Social class differences in the fantasy play of preschool children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 133, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Hagan, T. (1980). Effects of deprivation of exercise on nursery school children. Animal Behaviour, 28, 922–928. doi:10.1016/S.003-3472(80)80154-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (1990). School playgrounds as festival. Children’s Environment Quarterly, 7, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B., Mechling, J., Johnson, T. W., & McMahon, F. R. (Eds.). (1999). Children’s folklore: A source book. Logan: Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, J. W. (1969). Training letter discrimination in four-year-old children. Dissertation abstracts international, 30, 1030–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toppino, T. C., Kasserman, J. E., & Mracek, W. A. (1991). The effect of spacing repetitions on the recognition memory of young children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 123–138. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(91)900798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Labor. (2007). Work hours, breaks, and meal periods. Retrieved June 1, 2013 from http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/workhours/breaks.htm#lawregs.

  • Waite-Stupiansky, S., & Findlay, M. (2001). The fourth R: Recess and its link to learning. The Educational Forum, 66, 16–25. doi:10.1080/00131720108984795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, E., & Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Social competence as a developmental construct. Developmental Review, 3, 79–97. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(83)90010-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social competence at school: Relations between social responsibility and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 61, 1–24. doi:10.3102/00346543061001001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingert, P. (2000). Young and overweight. Newsweek, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yussen, S. R., & Levy, V. M. J. (1975). Developmental changes in predicting one’s own span of short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 502–508. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(75)90079-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zygmunt-Fillwalk, E., & Bilello, T. (2005). Parent’s victory in reclaiming recess for their children. Childhood Education, 82, 19–23. doi:10.1080/00094056.2005.10521335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine M. Bohn-Gettler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bohn-Gettler, C., Pellegrini, A. (2014). Recess in Primary School: The Disjuncture Between Educational Policy and Scientific Research. In: Bornstein, B., Wiener, R. (eds) Justice, Conflict and Wellbeing. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0623-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics