Abstract
The recent social unrest across the Middle East and North Africa has deposed dictators who had ruled for decades. While the events have been hailed as an “Arab Spring” by those who hope that repressive autocracies will be replaced by democracies, what sort of regimes will eventually emerge from the crisis remains far from certain. Here we provide a complex systems framework, validated by historical precedent, to help answer this question. We describe the dynamics of governmental change as an evolutionary process similar to biological evolution, in which complex organizations gradually arise by replication, variation, and competitive selection. Different kinds of governments, however, have differing levels of complexity. Democracies must be more systemically complex than autocracies because of their need to incorporate large numbers of people in decision-making. This difference has important implications for the relative robustness of democratic and autocratic governments after revolutions. Revolutions may disrupt existing evolved complexity, limiting the potential for building more complex structures quickly. Insofar as systemic complexity is reduced by revolution, democracy is harder to create in the wake of unrest than autocracy. Applying this analysis to the Middle East and North Africa, we infer that in the absence of stable institutions or external assistance, new governments are in danger of facing increasingly insurmountable challenges and reverting to autocracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gurr, T. R. (1988). War, revolution, and the growth of the coercive state. Comparative Political Studies, 21, 45.
Becker, J., & Goldstone, J. A. (2005). State development after revolutions - Rapid state building or transforming existing structures under pressure? In M. Lange & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), States and development: Historical antecedents of stagnation and advance (pp. 183–210). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Michels, R. (2001). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Ontario: Batoche Books.
Rueschemeyer, D. (2005) Building states: Inherently a long-term process? An argument from theory. In M. Lange & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), States and development: Historical antecedents of stagnation and advance (pp. 143–164). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weede, E., & Muller, E. N. (1997) Consequences of revolutions. Rationality and Society, 9, 327 (1997).
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foran, J., & Goodwin, J. (1993). Revolutionary outcomes in Iran and Nicaragua: Coalition fragmentation, war, and the limits of social transformation. Theory and Society, 22, 209 (1993).
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goldstone, J. A. (1998). The encyclopedia of political revolutions. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Rueschemeyer, D. (2010, October). On the state and prospects of comparative democratization research. Comparative Democratization Section of the American Political Science Association (APSA-CD) Newsletter, 8, 1.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1999). Ending revolutions and building new governments. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 49.
Goldstone, J. A., Bates, R. H., Epstein, D. L., Gurr, T. R., Lustik, M. B., Marshall, M. G., et al. (2010). A global model for forecasting political stability. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 190.
Lagi, M., Bertrand, K. Z., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2011, August 10). The food crises and political instability in North Africa and the Middle East. arXiv:1108.2455.
Bar-Yam, Y. (2005). Making things work: Solving complex problems in a complex world. Cambridge, MA: NECSI Knowledge Press.
Lewontin, R. C. (1970) The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1.
Bonner, J. T. (1988). The evolution of complexity by means of natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). Complexity rising: From human beings to human civilization, a complexity profile. In Encyclopedia of life support systems. Oxford: UNESCO/EOLSS.
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics (Chap. 11). London: Chapman & Hall.
Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Penguin.
Goldstone, J. A. (2001). Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 139.
Flannery, K. V. (1972). The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 3, 399.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (1972). Complex societies: The evolutionary origins of a crude superorganism. Human Nature, 10, 253.
Boix, C., & Svolik, M. (2011). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions and power-sharing in dictatorships, Working paper.
Svolik, M. (2009). Power-sharing and leadership dynamics in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 477.
Goemans, H. E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Chiozza, G. (2009). Introducing Archigos: A data set of political leaders. Journal of Peace Research, 46, 269.
Marshall, M. G., & Marshall, D. R. (2011). Coup d’Etat events, 1946–2010: Codebook. Center for Systemic Peace.
Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2012). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2010. Center for Systemic Peace.
Gleditsch, K. S. (2008). Modified polity P4 and P4D data, version 3.0. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~ksg/polity.html.
Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 5.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. London: Yale University Press.
Acknowledgments
We thank Greg Lindsay, Karla Z. Bertrand, Dominic Albino, Urbano França, and Yavni Bar-Yam for editorial assistance, Lawrence E Susskind, Robert H. Bates, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported in part by AFOSR under grant FA9550-09-1-0324, ONR under grant N000140910516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gard-Murray, A.S., Bar-Yam, Y. (2015). Complexity and the Limits of Revolution: What Will Happen to the Arab Spring?. In: Fellman, P., Bar-Yam, Y., Minai, A. (eds) Conflict and Complexity. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1705-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1705-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1704-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1705-1
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)