Skip to main content

Implications of Behavioral and Neuroscience Research for Cross-Cultural Training

  • Chapter
Neuroscience in Intercultural Contexts

Part of the book series: International and Cultural Psychology ((ICUP))

Abstract

Glazer, Blok, Mrazek, and Mathis first review the literature on priming of cultural syndromes as a gateway to targeting brain mechanisms underlying cultural differences. Most of this research, they point out, involves the priming of individualism or collectivism. They criticize this work as being too narrow, and ignoring the fact that most intercultural interactions involve relationships. They propose using the relational models of Fiske and colleagues as more representative of the reality of these relationships. They present data that show that these models can be successfully primed. They then suggest specific brain areas that would be activated when each model is primed. The implications of behavioral and neuroscience findings for research and training in the areas of intercultural relations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The type of figure used in Navon (1977) consists of repetitions of a particular letter of the alphabet (the local-level features), arranged to form the larger shape of another, possibly different letter of the alphabet (the global-level feature). For example, one such figure consists of many repetitions of the letter “S” that form a larger letter “H.”

  2. 2.

    As with any comparison of effect sizes, conclusions must be drawn with caution.

References

  • Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 18–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zahrani, S. S. A., & Kaplowitz, S. A. (1993). Attributional biases in individualistic and collectivistic cultures: A comparison of Americans with Saudis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(3), 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Sepulcre, J., Poulin, R., & Buckner, R. L. (2010). Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain’s default network. Neuron, 65, 550–562.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3–51). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beehr, T. A., & Glazer, S. (2005). Organizational role stress. In J. Barling, K. Kelloway, & M. Frone (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 7–33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 492–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H., & Leung, K. (2009). Cultural mapping of beliefs about the world and their application to a social psychology involving culture. In R. S. Wyer, C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 109–126). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H., & Yang, K. S. (1982). Ethnic affirmation versus cross-cultural accommodation: The variable impact of questionnaire language on Chinese bilinguals in Hong Kong. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, F. P., & Cairns, D. R. (2004). Do culture or situational constraints determine choice of direct or indirect styles in intercultural workplace conflicts? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 28, 331–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this we? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A., & Wyer, R. S. (2001). Transitory determinants of values and decisions: The utility (or nonutility) of individualism and collectivism in understanding cultural differences. Social Cognition, 19, 197–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A., & Wyer, R. S. (2002). The effect of group membership salience on the avoidance of negative outcomes: Implications for social and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 400–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. E., & de Waal, E. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, C. T., & Rempel, J. K. (2004). “It’s the end of the world as we know it”: Threat and the spatial-symbolic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 19–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C. (1995). New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-U.S. comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 408–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, B. K., Im, D., Harada, T., Kim, J., Mathur, V. A., Scimeca, J. M., et al. (2011). Cultural influences on neural basis of intergroup empathy. NeuroImage, 57, 642–650.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, J. Y., Harada, T., Oby, E. R., Li, Z., Parrish, T., & Bridge, D. J. (2009). Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 354–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, J. Y., Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., & Lipke, T. (2009). Neural basis of preference for human social hierarchy versus egalitarianism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 174–181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civai, C., Crescentini, C., Rustichini, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2012). Equality versus self-interest in the brain: Differential roles of anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 62, 102–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1611–1618.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Griffin, D. W., Milojkovic, J. D., & Ross, L. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 568–581.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, D., & Strobel, M. (2007). Preferences over income distributions. Public Finance Review, 35, 285–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., & Smith, P. B. (2003). Reward allocation and culture: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 251–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689–723.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures—A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). [Editorial Material]. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 78–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (2004). Relational models theory 2.0. In N. Haslam (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview (pp. 3–25). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P., & Haslam, N. (2005). The four basic social bonds: Structures for coordinating interaction. In M. W. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Dean, K. K. (2004). The individual as melting pot: The flexibility of bicultural self-construals. Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. (1999). “I” value freedom but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. W., & Long, R. I. (1962). Cognitive controls of attention and inhibition: A study of individual consistencies. British Journal of Psychology, 53, 381–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias: The what, when, how and why of unwarranted dispositional inference. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haberstroh, S., Oyserman, D., Schwarz, N., Kühnen, U., & Ji, L. J. (2002). Is the interdependent self more sensitive to question context than the independent self? Self-construal and the observation of conversational norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. (2010). Cultural neuroscience approach to understanding of self. State of the art presentation. Paper presented at the XXth International Congress of Cross-Cultural Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N. (2004). Relational models theory: A contemporary overview. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(06), 795–815.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312, 1767–1770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, R. J., & Pherson, R. H. (2010). Structured analytic techniques for intelligence analysts. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E., & Brendl, C. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation rules” influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(3), 218–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E., & Chaires, W. (1980). Accessibility of interrelational constructs: Implications for stimulus encoding and creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(4), 348–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. J., Pedersen, P. B., & Hofstede, G. H. (2002). Exploring culture: Exercises, stories, and synthetic cultures. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y. (2009). A dynamic constructivist approach to culture: Moving from describing culture to explaining culture. In R. S. Wyer, C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research and application (pp. 3–23). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., Benet-Martinez, V., Chiu, C., & Morris, M. (2003). Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 453–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y.-Y., Chiu, C.-Y., & Kung, T. M. (1997). Bringing culture out in front: Effects of cultural meaning system activation on social cognition. In K. Leung, Y. Kashima, U. Kim, & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135–146). Singapore: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–720.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320, 1092–1095.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Lieberman, M. D., Knowlton, B. J., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Moritz, M., Throop, C. J., et al. (2004). Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial prefrontal and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline. NeuroImage, 21, 1167–1173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(3), 306–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, L., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943–955.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, Y. (2009). Culture comparison and culture priming. In R. S. Wyer, C. Chiu, & Y. Hong (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 53–77). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier, M. (2003). Individualism and attitudes toward affirmative action: Evidence from priming experiments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier, M., & Cheng, B. (2004). Language and self-construal priming: A replication and extension in a Hong Kong sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 705–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier, M., Wieczorkowska, G., Erb, H.-P., & Burnstein, E. (2002). Individualism, authoritarianism, and attitudes toward assisted death: Cross-cultural, cross-regional, and experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 60–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Sciences, 11, 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, B., Taylor, J., Kaufman, M., Peterson, R., & Glover, G. (2005). Distributed neural representation of expected value. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4806–4812.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(5), 492–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The psychometrics of everyday life. Cognitive Psychology, 18(2), 195–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.). (2001). The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337–341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Bond, M. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 793–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., & Han, S. (2009). Self-construal priming modulates the scope of visual attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 802–813.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, H. C., Luber, B., Crupain, M., Keenan, J. P., Nowak, M., Kjaer, T. W., et al. (2004). Parietal cortex and representation of the mental self. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(17), 6827–6832.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marian, V., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2004). Self-construal and emotion in bicultural bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2006). Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science, 30, 381–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., & Chiao, J. Y. (2012). Racial identification modulates default network activity for same- and other- races. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 1883–1893.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (2005). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Social cognition: Key readings in social psychology (p. 333). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. L., Masten, C. L., Ma, Y., Wang, C., Shi, Z., Eisenberger, N. I., et al. (2012). Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. doi:10.1093/scan/nss019.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–978.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1986). Early cross-cultural commonalities in social explanation. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 514–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., Bersoff, D. M., & Harwood, R. L. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 33–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. P., Banaji, M. R., & MacRae, C. N. (2005). The link between social cognition and self referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1306–1315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 467–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner, K. N., Knierim, K., Ludlow, D. H., Ramachandran, T., Glover, G., & Mackey, S. C. (2004). Reflecting upon feelings: An fMRI study of neural systems supporting the attribution of emotion to self and other. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1746–1772.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D. (2007). Social identity and self-regulation. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D. (2011). Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology, 22, 164–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. [Review]. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2007). Priming ‘culture’: Culture as situated cognition. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 255–279). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008a). A situated cognition perspective on culture: Effects of priming cultural syndromes on cognition and motivation. In R. Sorrentino & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008b). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., & Sorensen, N. (2009). Understanding cultural syndrome effects on what and how we think: A situated cognition model. In R. Wyer, Y.-Y. Hong, & C.-Y. Chiu (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research and application (pp. 25–52). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. A., Cunniff, M. K., & Gustafson, D. J. (1995). Cultural accommodation: The effect of language on the responses of bilingual Hong Kong Chinese managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 714–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., Xun, W. Q. E., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). Language and the bicultural self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8), 1040–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossow, M. P. (2012). Engineering ethics case study: The Challenger disaster. Retrieved from http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Ethics%20Challenger%20Disaster.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saner, L., Mathis, A., Blok, S., & Glazer, S. (2013). Scenario norming study: Cross-cultural norming of scenarios. In S. Glazer & L. Saner (Eds.), Validating the unique cultural space of relational models: A foundation for priming research. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755–1758.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”. NeuroImage, 19, 1835–1842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Culture matters: National value cultures, sources, and consequences. In C. Chiu, Y. Hong, S. Shavitt, & J. R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 127–150). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439(7075), 466–469.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(6), 491–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solley, C. M., & Murphy, G. (1960). The development of the perceptual world. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 93–159). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srull, T. K. (2005). Person memory: Some tests of associative storage and retrieval models. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Social cognition: Key readings in social psychology (Vol. 2, p. 372). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1978). Category accessibility and social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 841–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., & Hannover, B. (1996). Awareness of influence as a precondition for implementing correctional goals. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 579–596). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19, 339–347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between private self and collective self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60, 649–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricomi, E. M., Delgado, M. R., & Fiez, J. A. (2004). Modulation of caudate activity by action contingency. Neuron, 41, 281–292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uskul, A. K., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2008, June 24). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz, S. (2004). Self-construal and cooperation: Is the interdependent self more cooperative than the independent self? Self and Identity, 3(3), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R. Y., & Hong, Y. (2005). Dynamic influences of culture on cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Science, 16, 429–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhull, M. D., & Louis, D. J. (2009). Why did they do THAT??? A cross-cultural study of daily decision-making by mexican maquiladoras and US/Canadian managers. Business Journal of Hispanic Research, 3, 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., & Carlston, D. E. (1979). Social cognition, inference, and attribution. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Glazer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glazer, S., Blok, S., Mrazek, A.J., Mathis, A.M. (2015). Implications of Behavioral and Neuroscience Research for Cross-Cultural Training. In: Warnick, J., Landis, D. (eds) Neuroscience in Intercultural Contexts. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2260-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics