Abstract
Microsurgical reconstruction of the male genital tract is the mainstay for the treatment of ductal obstruction. Up to 6% of patients presenting with primary infertility will have ductal obstruction, which may be curable with surgical reconstruction (Potts and Pasqualotta 1999). Furthermore, vasectomy is the most common urologic procedure performed and studies have shown that 6% of men will request a reversal due to changing life circumstances. Vasal injuries secondary to trauma or iatrogenic causes may also be corrected with microsurgical reconstruction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Belker AM, Thomas AJ Jr., Fuchs EF et al; Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol. 1991; 145:505.
Berger RE; Triangulation end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol. 1998; 159:1951.
Boorjian SA, Lipkin M, Goldstein M; The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 2004; 171(1):304–6.
Chan PT, Goldstein M; Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(5):1371–4.
Chan PT, Brandell RA, Goldstein M; Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusceptions vasoepididymostomy. BJU Int. 2005; 96:598.
Deck AJ, Berger RE; Should vasectomy reversal be performed in men with older female partners? J Urol. 2000; 163:105–6.
Dewire D, Thomas AJ. Microsurgical end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. In: Surgery of Male Fertility. Edited by M. Goldstein. Philadelphia:WB Saunders Company, pp. 128–34, 1995.
Dubin L, Amelar RD; Magnified surgery for epididymovasostomy. Urology. 1984; 23:525.
Fuchs EF, Burt RA; Vasectomy reversal performed 15 years or more after vasectomy: correlation of pregnancy outcome with partner age and with pregnancy results of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2002; 77:516.
Gerrard ER, Sandlow JI Jr., Oster RA et al; Effect of female age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril. 2007; 87:1340–4.
Hagner F; The operative treatment of sterility in the male. JAMA. 1936; 107:1851
Heidenreich A, Altmann P, Engelmann UH; Microsurgical vasovasostomy versus microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration/testicular sperm extraction of sperm combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Eur Urol. 2000; 37:609–14.
Hernandez J, Sabanegh ES; Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success. J Urol. 1999; 161:1153–6.
Hinrichsen MJ, Blaquier JA; Evidence supporting the existence of sperm maturation in the human epididymis. J Reprod Fertil. 1980; 60:291.
Hopps CV, Goldstein M; Microsurgical reconstruction of iatrogenic injuries to the epididymis from hydrocelectomy. J Urol. 2006; 176:2077.
Jarow JP, Sigman M, Buch JP et al; Delayed appearance of sperm after end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol. 1995; 153:1156.
Kolettis PN, Thomas AJ Jr.; Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol. 1997; 158:467–70.
Kolettis PN, Sabanegh ES, D’amico AM et al; Outcomes for vasectomy reversal performed after obstructive interval of at least 10 years. Urology. 2002; 60(5):855–8.
Kolettis PN, Sabanegh ES, Nalesnik JG et al; Pregnancy outcomes after vasectomy reversal for female partners 35 years old or older. J Urol. 2003; 169:2250.
Kolettis PN, Woo L, Sandlow JI; Outcomes of vasectomy reversal performed for men with the same female partners. Urology. 2003; 61:1221–3.
Lacham O, Trounson A; Fertilizing capacity of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa microinjected under the zona pellucida of the mouse oocyte. Mol Reprod Dev. 1991; 29:85.
Lee R, Li PS, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M; Reassessing reconstruction in the management of obstructive azoospermia: reconstruction or sperm acquisition? Urol Clin N Am. 2008; 35:289–301.
Lee R, Li PS, Goldstein M, et al; A decision analysis of treatments for obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:2043–9.
Marmar JL; Modified vasoepididymostomy with simultaneous double needle placement tubulotomy and tubular invagination. J Urol. 2000; 163:483.
Marmar JL, Sharlip I, Goldstein M; Results of vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy after failed percutaneous sperm aspirations. J Urol. 2008; 179:1506–9.
Martin E, Carnett JB, Levi JV, Pennington ME; The surgical treatment of sterility due to obstruction at the epididymis together with a study of the morphology of human sperm. University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin. 1902; 15:2–15.
Matthews GJ, Shlegel PN, Goldstein M; Patency following microsurgical vaso-epididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations. J Urol. 1995; 154:2070–3.
Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ; Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. 2005; 174:1926–31.
Nalesnik JG, Sabanegh ES Jr; Vasovasostomy: multiple children and long-term pregnancy rates. Curr Surg. 2003; 60:348.
Parekattil SJ, Kuang W, Agarwal A et al; Model to predict if a vasoepididymostomy will be required for vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 2005; 173:1681.
Parekattil SJ, Kuang W, Kolettis PN et al; Multi-institutional validation of vasectomy reversal predictor. J Urol. 2006; 175:247.
Potts JM, Pasqualotta FF, Nelson D et al; Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 1999; 161(6):1835–9.
Schlegal PN, Goldstein M; Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: refinements and results. J Urol. 1993; 150:1165–8.
Shiff J, Chan P, Li PS et al; Outcome and late failures compared in 4 techniques of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in 153 consecutive men. J Urol. 2005; 174(2):651–5.
Sigman M; The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy. J Urol. 2004; 171:307–9.
Silber SJ; Microscopic vasoepididymostomy: specific microanastomosis to the epididymal tubule. Fertil Steril. 1978; 30(5):565–7.
Silber SJ; Apparent fertility of human spermatozoa from the caput epididymidis. J Androl. 1989; 10:263.
Silber SJ, Grotjan HE; Microscopic vasectomy reversal 30 years later: a summary of 4010 cases by the same surgeon. J Androl. 2004; 25:845–9.
Thomas AJ; Vasoepididymostomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1987; 14:527–38.
Witt MA, Heron S, Lipshultz LI; The postvasectomy length of the testicular remnant: a predictor of surgical outcome in microscopic vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 1994; 151:892–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sabanegh, E.S., Siddiqi, K. (2011). Surgical Reconstructions for Obstruction. In: Sabanegh, E. (eds) Male Infertility. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-193-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-193-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-192-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-193-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)