Skip to main content

Surgical Reconstructions for Obstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Male Infertility

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

Abstract

Microsurgical reconstruction of the male genital tract is the mainstay for the treatment of ductal obstruction. Up to 6% of patients presenting with primary infertility will have ductal obstruction, which may be curable with surgical reconstruction (Potts and Pasqualotta 1999). Furthermore, vasectomy is the most common urologic procedure performed and studies have shown that 6% of men will request a reversal due to changing life circumstances. Vasal injuries secondary to trauma or iatrogenic causes may also be corrected with microsurgical reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belker AM, Thomas AJ Jr., Fuchs EF et al; Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol. 1991; 145:505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berger RE; Triangulation end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol. 1998; 159:1951.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boorjian SA, Lipkin M, Goldstein M; The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 2004; 171(1):304–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan PT, Goldstein M; Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(5):1371–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan PT, Brandell RA, Goldstein M; Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusceptions vasoepididymostomy. BJU Int. 2005; 96:598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deck AJ, Berger RE; Should vasectomy reversal be performed in men with older female partners? J Urol. 2000; 163:105–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewire D, Thomas AJ. Microsurgical end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. In: Surgery of Male Fertility. Edited by M. Goldstein. Philadelphia:WB Saunders Company, pp. 128–34, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin L, Amelar RD; Magnified surgery for epididymovasostomy. Urology. 1984; 23:525.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs EF, Burt RA; Vasectomy reversal performed 15 years or more after vasectomy: correlation of pregnancy outcome with partner age and with pregnancy results of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2002; 77:516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard ER, Sandlow JI Jr., Oster RA et al; Effect of female age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril. 2007; 87:1340–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagner F; The operative treatment of sterility in the male. JAMA. 1936; 107:1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich A, Altmann P, Engelmann UH; Microsurgical vasovasostomy versus microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration/testicular sperm extraction of sperm combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Eur Urol. 2000; 37:609–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez J, Sabanegh ES; Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success. J Urol. 1999; 161:1153–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichsen MJ, Blaquier JA; Evidence supporting the existence of sperm maturation in the human epididymis. J Reprod Fertil. 1980; 60:291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopps CV, Goldstein M; Microsurgical reconstruction of iatrogenic injuries to the epididymis from hydrocelectomy. J Urol. 2006; 176:2077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarow JP, Sigman M, Buch JP et al; Delayed appearance of sperm after end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol. 1995; 153:1156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolettis PN, Thomas AJ Jr.; Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol. 1997; 158:467–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolettis PN, Sabanegh ES, D’amico AM et al; Outcomes for vasectomy reversal performed after obstructive interval of at least 10 years. Urology. 2002; 60(5):855–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolettis PN, Sabanegh ES, Nalesnik JG et al; Pregnancy outcomes after vasectomy reversal for female partners 35 years old or older. J Urol. 2003; 169:2250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolettis PN, Woo L, Sandlow JI; Outcomes of vasectomy reversal performed for men with the same female partners. Urology. 2003; 61:1221–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lacham O, Trounson A; Fertilizing capacity of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa microinjected under the zona pellucida of the mouse oocyte. Mol Reprod Dev. 1991; 29:85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R, Li PS, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M; Reassessing reconstruction in the management of obstructive azoospermia: reconstruction or sperm acquisition? Urol Clin N Am. 2008; 35:289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R, Li PS, Goldstein M, et al; A decision analysis of treatments for obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23:2043–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marmar JL; Modified vasoepididymostomy with simultaneous double needle placement tubulotomy and tubular invagination. J Urol. 2000; 163:483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marmar JL, Sharlip I, Goldstein M; Results of vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy after failed percutaneous sperm aspirations. J Urol. 2008; 179:1506–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin E, Carnett JB, Levi JV, Pennington ME; The surgical treatment of sterility due to obstruction at the epididymis together with a study of the morphology of human sperm. University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin. 1902; 15:2–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews GJ, Shlegel PN, Goldstein M; Patency following microsurgical vaso-epididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations. J Urol. 1995; 154:2070–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ; Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. 2005; 174:1926–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nalesnik JG, Sabanegh ES Jr; Vasovasostomy: multiple children and long-term pregnancy rates. Curr Surg. 2003; 60:348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parekattil SJ, Kuang W, Agarwal A et al; Model to predict if a vasoepididymostomy will be required for vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 2005; 173:1681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parekattil SJ, Kuang W, Kolettis PN et al; Multi-institutional validation of vasectomy reversal predictor. J Urol. 2006; 175:247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts JM, Pasqualotta FF, Nelson D et al; Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 1999; 161(6):1835–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegal PN, Goldstein M; Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: refinements and results. J Urol. 1993; 150:1165–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiff J, Chan P, Li PS et al; Outcome and late failures compared in 4 techniques of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in 153 consecutive men. J Urol. 2005; 174(2):651–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman M; The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy. J Urol. 2004; 171:307–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silber SJ; Microscopic vasoepididymostomy: specific microanastomosis to the epididymal tubule. Fertil Steril. 1978; 30(5):565–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silber SJ; Apparent fertility of human spermatozoa from the caput epididymidis. J Androl. 1989; 10:263.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silber SJ, Grotjan HE; Microscopic vasectomy reversal 30 years later: a summary of 4010 cases by the same surgeon. J Androl. 2004; 25:845–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas AJ; Vasoepididymostomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1987; 14:527–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witt MA, Heron S, Lipshultz LI; The postvasectomy length of the testicular remnant: a predictor of surgical outcome in microscopic vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 1994; 151:892–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmund S. Sabanegh Jr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sabanegh, E.S., Siddiqi, K. (2011). Surgical Reconstructions for Obstruction. In: Sabanegh, E. (eds) Male Infertility. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-193-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-193-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-192-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-193-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics