Skip to main content

Behavioural Preferences for Engineering Asset Management

  • Conference paper
Engineering Asset Management

Abstract

The essence of managing physical assets that form our built environment is to provide benefits to satisfy the continuum of constraints imposed by rapidly changing business strategy, economy, ergonomics, operational and technical integrity, and regulatory compliance. Innovative approaches to enhance and sustain the profile of values required from these assets demands a shift in the behavioural preferences or attitudes of engineering professionals in asset management occupations. This implies that engineering professionals in asset management occupations need to adapt to new thinking styles, and adopt effective cognitive and mental processing modes. Whilst assuming that thinking styles manifest in attitudes, this paper describes the results of a 2005 survey of 190 practicing engineers to ascertain what thinking styles should determine behavioural preferences of engineering-oriented managers of built environment assets of the innovation generation. The study confirms other results from cognitive theory and psychology, highlighting the top ten thinking styles as ranked by survey respondents. The paper is intended to provide a strategic view of Engineering Asset Management within the context of innovation, with particular focus on behavioural alignment towards the modern paradigm of the knowledge and learning economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5 References

  1. Amadi-Echendu J. (2005) Physical asset management requires a paradigm shift from maintenance: MESA Tour 2005 and ICOMS 2005 Keynote address. Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, Newcastle, Perth, Sidney, Wollongong and Hobart. 30 May–10 June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amadi-Echendu J. (2003) Developing operational capability during major capital projects: Proceedings of International Conference on Maintenance and Asset Management (ICAMM), Pretoria, South Africa. Oct 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maccoby M. (1994). From Analyzer to Humanizer: Raising the Level of Management Thinking. Research Technology Management, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herrmann N. (1996). The Whole Brain Business Book, McGraw-Hill ISBN: 0070284628

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Joseph Mathew Jim Kennedy Lin Ma Andy Tan Deryk Anderson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 CIEAM/MESA

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amadi-Echendu, J. (2006). Behavioural Preferences for Engineering Asset Management. In: Mathew, J., Kennedy, J., Ma, L., Tan, A., Anderson, D. (eds) Engineering Asset Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-814-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-583-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-814-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics