Skip to main content

Complications in Gynecological Oncology

  • Chapter
Complications in Gynecological Surgery

Abstract

This quote provides a very good introduction to this chapter. Complications occur in all forms of gynecological surgery. They can be reduced by a variety of strategies. The view expressed by the consultant quoted above may reflect a number of points. First, the consultant’s surgical workload or practice may be too small. Unless complications occur frequently, the practitioner with a small practice will not see many problems within an assessable time frame. Therefore, there will be a lack of insight with regard to these problems or even a selective memory, leading the practitioner to believe that his or her surgeries have few or no complications. This trend has been compounded in the National Health Service (NHS) by poor data collection and no agreement regarding the minimum data set relating to complications. Audit of outcomes and complications is sporadic and usually covers only a short time period. This deficit also leads to complacency with respect to complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. NHS Executive. Improving Outcomes in Gynaecological Cancers-The Manual. London: NHS Executive; July 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, Trimble EL, Montz FJ. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1248–1259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shepherd JH. Revised FIGO staging for gynaecological cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96:889–892.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shepherd JH, Ngan HY, Neven P, Fryatt I, Woodhouse CR, Hendry WF. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting survival in pelvic exenteration. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1994;6:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wight R, Baldock M. Report from the Working Party on Co-Morbidity Assessment in Cancer-Its Role in the National Core Cancer Dataset. Exeter, England: NHS Information Authority; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arbous MS, Grobbee DE, van Kleef JW, et al. Mortality associated with anaesthesia: a qualitative analysis to identify risk factors. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:1141–1153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guaschino S, De Santo TD, De Seta F. New perspectives in antibiotic prophylaxis for obstetric and gynaecological surgery. J Hosp Infect. 2002;50(suppl A):S13–S16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Eidan FA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Kearney MP. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in hospitalised patients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000;25:101–109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Crandon AJ, Koutts J. Incidence of post-operative deep vein thrombosis in gynaecological oncology. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;23:216–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nunns D, Williamson K, Swaney L, Davy M. The morbidity of surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in the management of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000;10:233–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen BL, van Der Does J. Surviving gynecologic cancer and coping with sexual morbidity: an international problem. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1994;4:225–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tingulstad S, Hagen B, Skjeldestad FE, Halvorsen T, Nustad K, Onsrud M. The risk-of-malignancy index to evaluate potential ovarian cancers in local hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:448–452.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Luesley D, Lawton F, Blackledge G, et al. Failure of second-look laparotomy to influence survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1988;8611:599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:392–398.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Junor EJ, Hole DJ, McNulty L, Mason M, Young J. Specialist gynaecologists and survival outcome in ovarian cancer: a Scottish national study of 1866 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:1130–1136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crawford, R.A. (2008). Complications in Gynecological Oncology. In: O’Donovan, P. (eds) Complications in Gynecological Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-882-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-883-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics