Skip to main content

The Need for New Paradigms in Safety Engineering

  • Conference paper
Safety-Critical Systems: Problems, Process and Practice

Abstract

The world and technology are changing, but these changes are not reflected in our safety engineering approaches. Many of the underlying assumptions of the traditional techniques no longer hold for the complex, high-tech systems being built today. We need new models of accident causality and engineering techniques built on them that handle these new systems and problems. An example of a new model, based on systems theory rather than reliability theory, is described and some uses of such a model are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackoff RL (1971) Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science 17:661–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker S (2007) Just Culture: Balancing Safety and Accountability. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulac N, Leveson N (2004) An Approach to Design for Safety in Complex Systems. International Conference on System Engineering (INCOSE), Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulac N, Leveson, N (2005) Incorporating Safety into Early System Architecture Trade Studies. Int. Conference of the System Safety Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulac N, Owens B, Leveson N et al (2007) Demonstration of a New Dynamic Approach to Risk Analysis for NASA’s Constellation Program. CSRL Final Project Report. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/ESMD-Final-Report.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2008

  • JPL Special Review Board (2000) Report on the Loss of the Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 Missions. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 22 March 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplat, J (1987) Occupational accident research and systems approach. In: Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J (eds) New Technology and Human Error. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (2004) A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems. Safety Science 42: 237–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (2007) Technical and Managerial Factors in the NASA Challenger and Columbia Losses: Looking Forward to the Future. In: Kleinman DL, Cloud-Hansen KA, Matta C, Handelsman J (eds) Controversies in Science and Technology, Vol. 2: From Chromosomes to the Cosmos, Mary Ann Liebert, New Rochelle, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (2008) System Safety Engineering: Back to the Future. Unfinished manuscript. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/book2.html. Accessed 27 August 2008

  • Leveson N, Daouk M, Dulac N, Marais K (2003) Applying STAMP in Accident Analysis. Second Workshop on the Investigation and Reporting of Accidents, Williamsburg, September 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N, Dulac N, Barrett B et al (2005) Risk Analysis of NASA Independent Technical Authority. CSRL Final Report. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/ITA-Risk-Analysis.doc. Accessed 27 August 2008

  • Leveson N, Marais K, Dulac N, Carroll J (2009) Beyond Normal Accidents and High Reliability Organizations: The Need for an Alternative Approach to Safety in Complex Systems. To appear in Organizational Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA/ESA Investigation Board (1998) SOHO Mission Interruption. NASA, 31 August 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens B, Herring M, Leveson N et al (2008) Application of a Safety-Driven Design Methodology to an Outer Planet Exploration Mission. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramo S (1973) The systems approach. In: Miles RF (ed) Systems Concepts: Lectures on Contemporary Approaches to Systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J (1997) Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem. Safety Science 27: 183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, PM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheen B (1987) Herald of Free Enterprise Report. Marine Accident Investigation Branch, Department of Transport (originally Report of Court No 8074 Formal Investigation, HMSO, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J (2002) All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review 18:501-531

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leveson, N.G. (2009). The Need for New Paradigms in Safety Engineering. In: Dale, C., Anderson, T. (eds) Safety-Critical Systems: Problems, Process and Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-349-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-349-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-348-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-349-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics