Skip to main content

How Creative Groups Structure Tasks Through Negotiating Resources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of COOP 2010

Abstract

Creative collaborations are a complex, yet common phenomenon. In this paper we introduce a model that describes the development of a creative outcome by a group, based on its efforts to structure the task through the exploration and adoption of concepts and artefacts. We use our model as a basis to analyse a collaborative filmmaking study. Through this, we show how the model is an effective tool for describing the actions of the group as its members work towards producing an outcome. We conclude that the model could be utilised as a tool for recognising patterns in creative collaborations, for understanding support needs, and for comparing instances of these tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baer, J.: Evaluative Thinking, Creativity, and Task Specificity, In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical Creative Processes. Hampton Press, USA, pp. 129–151 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boden, M. A.: The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Abacus Books, London (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coughlan, T., Johnson P.: An Exploration of Constraints and End User Development in Environments for Creative Tasks, International Journal of Human Computer Interaction. Vol. 24, Issue 5. 444–459 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coughlan, T., Johnson, P.: Interaction in creative tasks: Ideation, representation and evaluation in composition. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, pp. 531–540 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gabora, L: Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM Press, New York, pp. 126–133 (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. González, M.G., Burke, M.J., Santuzzi, A.M., Bradley, J.C.: The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 19, 629–648 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lieberman, H., Paternò, F. & Wulf, V.: End User Development, Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Middup, C.P., Johnson, P.: Modeling Group Artifact Adoption for Awareness in Activity-focused Co-located Meetings, Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Tasks Models and Diagrams, Toulouse, France (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norman, D. A. The design of everyday things. Doubleday, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pérez y Pérez, R., Sharples, M.: MEXICA: A computer model of a cognitive account of creative writing. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13(2), 119–139 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritchie T: http://www.swemorph.com/pdf/wp.pdf (2008)

  12. Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Planning Problems are Wicked Problems, in Cross, N. (Ed.) Developments in Design Methodology, Wiley, New York, pp. 135–144. (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sarmiento, J. W., Stahl, G.: Group Creativity in Virtual Math Teams: Interaction Mechanisms for Referencing, Bridging and Remembering, Proc. Creativity and Cognition, ACM Press, New York, pp. 37–44 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sawyer, R. K.: Group Creativity: Music, Theatre, Collaboration. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schön, D. A., Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, H.A.: Models of man - social and rational, Wiley, New York (1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Stokes, P.: Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough, Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K.P., Futrell, D.: Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness, American Psychologist, Vol. 45, Issue 2, 120–133 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Paul Middup .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Middup, C.P., Coughlan, T., Johnson, P. (2010). How Creative Groups Structure Tasks Through Negotiating Resources. In: Lewkowicz, M., Hassanaly, P., Wulf, V., Rohde, M. (eds) Proceedings of COOP 2010. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-211-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-211-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-210-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-211-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics