Skip to main content

Answering Complex Queries on Legal Networks: A Direct and a Structured IR Approaches

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems (AICOL 2015, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2016, AICOL 2017, AICOL 2017)

Abstract

This paper highlights the benefit of semantic information retrieval in legal networks. User queries get more complex when they combine constraints on semantic content and intertextual links between documents. Comparing two methods of search in legal collection networks, we present new functionalities of search and browsing. Relying on a structured representation of the collection graph, the first approach allows for approximate answers and knowledge discovery. The second one supports richer semantics and scalability but offers fewer search functionalities. We indicate how those approaches could be combined to get the best of both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The target scale is a few hundred documents, but we must further optimize the code for it (solutions exist, it is an implementation issue).

  2. 2.

    www.ilo.org.

  3. 3.

    http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/.

References

  1. Amardeilh, F., et al.: The légilocal project: the local law simply shared. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2013: The Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference, University of Bologna, Italy, 11–13 December 2013, pp. 11–14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fowler, J.H., Johnson, T.R., Spriggs, J.F., Jeon, S., Wahlbeck, P.J.: Network analysis and the law: measuring the legal importance of precedents at the U.S. supreme court. Polit. Anal. 15, 324–346 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gultemen, D., van Engers, T.: Graph-based linking and visualization for legislation documents (GLVD). In: Network Analysis in Law Workshop (NAiL2013@ICAIL) associated with ICAIL 2013, Rome, Italy, June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rouane-Hacene, M., Valtchev, P., Nkambou, R.: Supporting ontology design through large-scale FCA-based ontology restructuring. In: Andrews, S., Polovina, S., Hill, R., Akhgar, B. (eds.) ICCS 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6828, pp. 257–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22688-5_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Mimouni, N., Nazarenko, A., Paul, È., Salotti, S.: Towards graph-based and semantic search in legal information access systems. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2014, Krakow, Poland. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 271, pp. 163–168. IOS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mimouni, N., Nazarenko, A., Salotti, S.: A conceptual approach for relational IR: application to legal collections. In: Baixeries, J., Sacarea, C., Ojeda-Aciego, M. (eds.) ICFCA 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9113, pp. 303–318. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19545-2_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Boulet, R., Mazzega, P., Bourcier, D.: A network approach to the French system of legal codes- part i: analysis of a dense network. J. Artif. Intell. Law 19, 333–355 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rubin, R.: Foundations of Library and Information Science. Neal-Schuman Publishers, Chicago (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Winkels, R., Boer, A., Plantevin, I.: Creating context networks in Dutch legislation. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2013, Italy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 259, pp. 155–164. IOS Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Winkels, R., de Ruyter, J.: Survival of the fittest: network analysis of dutch supreme court cases. In: Palmirani, M., Pagallo, U., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G. (eds.) AICOL 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7639, pp. 106–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Wray, T., Eklund, P.: Exploring the information space of cultural collections using formal concept analysis. In: Valtchev, P., Jäschke, R. (eds.) ICFCA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6628, pp. 251–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20514-9_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by French Single Inter-Ministry Fund (FUI-9, 2010–2013) and is supported by the Labex EFL supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-10-LABX-0083).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nada Mimouni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mimouni, N., Nazarenko, A., Salotti, S. (2018). Answering Complex Queries on Legal Networks: A Direct and a Structured IR Approaches. In: Pagallo, U., Palmirani, M., Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Villata, S. (eds) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. AICOL AICOL AICOL AICOL AICOL 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10791. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00177-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00178-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics