Skip to main content

Effects of High Stocking Grazing Density of Diverse Swards on Forage Production, Animal Performance and Soil Organic Matter: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Approaches and Applications for Sustainable Rural Development (HAICTA 2017)

Abstract

Mob grazing is regarded as a grazing management practice to increase soil organic matter, pasture productivity and nutrient cycling. There are different perspectives in the literature regarding the definition of mob grazing, but it is generally accepted that mob grazing is characterised by high stocking densities of livestock which are moved frequently from paddock to paddock (e.g. with the aid of electric fences), trampling forage into the soil as they graze. It has also been recognised that biodiverse pastures have the potential to build up carbon levels in the soil much more effectively than conventional (usually monocultures) or less diverse pastures; in turn all can enhance animal productivity and maintain good herd health. This paper reviews the concept of mob grazing and the benefits of diverse swards and provides evidence whether high stocking density as a grazing strategy can increase soil organic matter and enhance overall animal performance. The grazing rotation applied in the farm during the study year was rather short to fulfil the expectations of a mob-grazing system, but stocking density was high (115 t LW ha−1). The results show that high stocking grazing density of biodiverse pastures has a remarkable effect on the build-up of the soil organic matter and that biodiverse pastures serve as a viable alternative to conventional pastures as they can maintain animal productivity at high levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta EJ, Hodgson J, Kothmann M, Li X, McIvor J, Milne J, Morris C, Peeters A, Sanderson M (2011) An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass Forage Sci 66:2–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson B (2015) When mob grazing is not mob grazing. Progressive Forage, Progressive Publishing. Available on-line: https://www.progressiveforage.com/forage-types/grasses-and-grazing/when-mob-grazing-is-not-mob-grazing

  • Andueza D, Picard F, Jestin M, Aufrère J (2013) The effect of feeding animals ad libitum vs. at maintenance level on the in vivo digestibility of mown herbage from two permanent grasslands of different botanical composition. Grass Forage Sci 68:418–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartimus HL, Montgomery TG, Philipp D, Cater J, Coffey KP, Shanks BC (2016) 118 Mob grazing effects on cattle performance in Southeast Arkansas. J Anim Sci 94:55–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco M, Casasús I, Ripoll G, Panea B, Albertí P, Joy M (2010) Lucerne grazing compared with concentrate-feeding slightly modifies carcase and meat quality of young bulls. Meat Sci 84:545–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant RH, Miller ME, Greenwood SL, Edwards GR (2017) Milk yield and nitrogen excretion of dairy cows grazing binary and multispecies pastures. Grass Forage Sci 72:806–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T (2012) Are mob grazed cattle the perfect arable break? A Nuffield Farming Scholarships Trust report. John Oldacre Foundation, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Clatworthy JN (1984) The charter estate grazing trial: results of the botanical analysis. Zimb Agric J 81(2):41–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring TF, Baddeley JA, Brown R, Collins R, Crowley O, Cuttle SP, Howlett SA, Jones HE, McCalman H, Measures M, Pearce BD, Pearce H, Roderick S, Stobart R, Storkey J, Tilston E, Topp K, Watson CA, Winkler L, Wolfe MS (2013) Using legume-based mixtures to enhance the nitrogen use efficiency and economic viability of cropping systems – Final report (LK09106/HGCA3447)

    Google Scholar 

  • FGTC (The Forage and Grazing Terminology Committee) (1991) Terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Pocahontas Press, Inc, Blacksburg or J Prod Agric 5:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster L (1988) Herbs in pastures. Development research in Britain, 1850–1984. Biol Agric Hortic 5:97–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin ACM, Westra S, Loucks CES, Janovicek K, Martin RC et al (2013) Improving resilience of northern field crop systems using inter-seeded red clover: a review. Agronomy 3:148–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gompert T (2010) The power of stock density. In: Proc.: Nebraska Grazing Conference. Kearney, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoste H, Torres-Acosta JFJ, Sandoval-Castro CA, Mueller-Harvey I, Sotiraki S, Louvandini H, Thamsborg SM, Terrill TH (2015) Tannin containing legumes as a model for nutraceuticals against digestive parasites in livestock. Vet Parasitol 212:5–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight P, Rayns F, Rosenfeld A, Heading E, Will T et al (2008) An investigation into the adoption of green manures in both organic and conventional rotations to aid nitrogen management and maintain soil structure 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström BEM, Frankow-Lindberg BE, Dahlin AS, Wivstad M, Watson CA (2013) Micronutrient concentrations in common and novel forage species and varieties grown on two contrasting soils. Grass Forage Sci 68:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher A, Mueller-Harvey I, Soussana JF, Rees RM, Peyraud JL (2014) Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass Forage Sci 69:206–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCosker T (2000) Cell grazing – the first 10 years in Australia. Trop Grassl 34:207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton BD, Dong X, Nyren PE, Nyren A (2007) Effects of grazing intensity, precipitation, and temperature on forage production. Rangel Ecol Manag 60:656–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson D (2010) How mob grazing impacts your soil. Retrieved from: https://www.drovers.com/article/how-mob-grazing-impacts-your-soil

  • Peterson D (2014) Soil health and production benefits of mob grazing. Retrieved from: http://www.forestrywebinars.net/webinars/soil-health-and-productionbenefits-of-mob-grazing

  • Peterson PR, Gerrish JR (1995) Grazing management affects manure distribution by beef cattle. In: Proc. Am. Forage Grassland Council, Lexington, pp 170–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirhofer-Walzl K, Rasmussen J, Høgh-Jensen H, Eriksen J, Søegaard K, Rasmussen J (2012) Nitrogen transfer from forage legumes to nine neighbouring plants in a multi-species grassland. Plant Soil 350:71–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redden MD (2014) Grazing method effects on forage production, utilization, and animal performance on Nebraska sand hills meadow

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond R (2011) The benefits to agriculture and the environment of rebuilding soil carbon. A nuffield farming scholarships trust report. John Oldacre Foundation, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca-Fernández AI, Peyraud JL, Delaby L, Delagarde R (2016) Pasture intake and milk production of dairy cows rotationally grazing on multi-species swards. Animal 10:1448–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochon JJ, Doyle CJ, Greef JM, Hopkins A, Molle G, Sitzia M, Scholefield D, Smith CJ (2004) Grazing legumes in Europe: a review of their status, management, benefits, research needs and future prospects. Grass Forage Sci 59:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romera AJ, Doole GJ, Beukes PC, Mason N, Mudge PL (2017) The role and value of diverse sward mixtures in dairy farm systems of New Zealand: an exploratory assessment. Agric Syst 152:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouille B, Delaby L, Delagarde R, Caillaud D, Desarmenien D, Daveau B, Guibert S (2016) Benefits of using legumes as forage or fodder to feed French dairy cattle. Fourrages 227:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory, A., and S.D. Parsons (1980) The Savory Grazing Method. Rangelands. 2:234–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory A (1983) The savory grazing method or holistic resource management. Rangelands 5:155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory A, Butterfield J (1999) Holistic management – a new framework for decision making. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Seither M, Wrage N, Isselstein J (2012) Sward composition and grazer species effects on nutritive value and herbage accumulation. Agron J 104:497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuth JW, Kirby DR, Chmielewski RE (1981) Effects of herbage allowance on efficiency of defoliation by the grazing animal. Grass Forage Sci 36:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogeler I, Vibart R, Cichota R (2017) Potential benefits of diverse pasture swards for sheep and beef farming. Agric Syst 154:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Duan W-X, TU C, Washburn S, Cheng L, Hu S (2014) Soil carbon, nitrogen and microbial dynamics of pasturelands: impacts of grazing intensity and planting systems. Pedosphere 24:408–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber KT, Gokhale BS (2011) Effect of grazing on soil-water content in semiarid rangelands of Southeast Idaho. J Arid Environ 75:464–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright AL, Hons FM, Rouquette FM (2004) Long-term management impacts on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics of grazed bermudagrass pastures. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1809–1816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Rob Richmond for this valuable input to this work. This study was undertaken in the European research project “SOLID; Sustainable Organic and Low-input Dairying” (Agreement no. 266367; http://www.solidairy.eu/), with financial support from the 7th Framework Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Zaralis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zaralis, K., Padel, S. (2019). Effects of High Stocking Grazing Density of Diverse Swards on Forage Production, Animal Performance and Soil Organic Matter: A Case Study. In: Theodoridis, A., Ragkos, A., Salampasis, M. (eds) Innovative Approaches and Applications for Sustainable Rural Development. HAICTA 2017. Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02312-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics