Abstract
The research lesson sets lesson study apart from most other forms of teacher learning. The observed interactive, real-time lesson puts theories about learning, expressed as a lesson plan, to the test of practice, in the company of one’s professional peers. In a cycle of lesson study, the research lesson sits between the planning that teachers do in preparation for interactive work and the analysis that teachers do after a lesson with students. As such, lesson study holds particular promise for preservice teacher education because it can serve as a bridge between theory and practice, a divide that has confounded teacher education for decades. Typically, preservice coursework provides opportunities for planning before lessons and analysis of artifacts coming out of lessons, but the actual interactive work with children is distant—and it is precisely this interactive work that most concerns preservice teachers. Thus, lesson study, with its inclusion of the research lesson, provides a promising model for preservice teacher learning. This chapter presents a case of lesson study carried out in a methods class for elementary preservice teachers. Analyses of data in this case study show that preservice teachers developed an expansive disposition of mathematical care, a repertoire of pedagogical moves linked to research and children’s learning, and an expanded sense of the teaching self from their participation in a cycle of lesson study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All names are pseudonyms.
- 2.
A “long” is a rod of 10 units in length; a “cube” is one unit.
- 3.
PT = preservice teacher; I = instructor.
References
Alter, J., & Coggshall, J. G. (2009). Teaching as a clinical practice profession: Implications for teacher preparation and state policy. Issue Brief. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind (Vol. 15). New York: Basic Books.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clift, R. T., & Brady, P. (2005). In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.)., Studying teacher education Research on methods courses and field experiences (pp. 309–424). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184–205.
Hutchins, E. (1996). Learning to navigate). In S. Chaiklen & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 35–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, C. C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(2), 178–194.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stenhouse, L. (1985). Research as a basis for teaching: Readings from the work of Lawrence Stenhouse. London/Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Summit.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 89(11), 89–99.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewis, J.M. (2019). Lesson Study for Preservice Teachers. In: Huang, R., Takahashi, A., da Ponte, J.P. (eds) Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04030-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04031-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)