Abstract
Decision-making for pregnant women or fetuses who suffer brain injury is emotionally difficult and conceptually challenging. When both the pregnant woman and the fetus have suffered an injury with a poor neurological prognosis, and decisions about one of them will have implications for the other—decision-making is even more difficult. Decision-making standards and principles are reviewed for both pregnant women and for fetuses, using a real case from the author’s institution. Practical suggestions are made regarding deliberative processes and consultative models that can help with these difficult cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
People from some religious traditions do in fact claim that a just-fertilized egg has the same interests as a newborn baby, and that destroying a just-fertilized egg would violate the same norms that are violated if one were to kill a healthy newborn. Holding such a viewpoint would dramatically alter the ethical analysis involving life-sustaining therapies for pregnant women. Analysis of cases from this viewpoint, and analysis of the full ethical implications of such a viewpoint, are beyond the scope of this chapter.
References
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. A framework of standards for surrogate decision making. In: Pierce J, Randels G, editors. Contemporary bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Ringer S. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) ethics. In: Toy E, Raine SP, Cochrane T, editors. Case files: medical ethics and professionalism. New York: McGraw Hill; 2015. p. 267–277.
Hagen EM, Therkelsen OB, Forde R, Aasland O, Janvier A, Hansen TW. Challenges in reconciling best interest and parental exercise of autonomy in pediatric life-or-death situations. J Pediatr. 2012;161:146–51.
Harrison H. The offer they can’t refuse: parents and perinatal treatment decisions. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;13:329–34.
McHaffie HE, Laing IA, Parker M, McMillan J. Deciding for imperiled newborns: medical authority or parental autonomy? J Med Ethics. 2001;27:104–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cochrane, T.I. (2019). Ethical Decisions in Pregnancy. In: O’Neal, M. (eds) Neurology and Psychiatry of Women. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04245-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04245-5_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04244-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04245-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)