Skip to main content

The Mathematical Environment of Quantum Information

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum Computation and Logic

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 48))

Abstract

The general idea that inspires all approaches to quantum computation is that information can be stored and transmitted by quantum physical systems. Thus, the quantum-theoretic formalism represents the natural mathematical environment for quantum computation theory. While classical information theory (as well classical mechanics) are naturally based on a twovalued semantics, the characteristic uncertainties of the quantum world have brought about some deep logical innovations, due to the divergence between the concepts of maximal information and logically complete information. Quantum pure states represent pieces of information that are at the same time maximal (since they cannot be consistently extended to a richer knowledge) and logically incomplete (since they cannot decide all the relevant properties of the objects under investigation). This chapter illustrates the basic quantum-theoretic concepts that play an important role in quantum information and in quantum computation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(\mathscr {M}({\mathscr {P}h}_\mathbf S)\) is the smallest subset of the power set of \(\mathscr {P}h_\mathbf S\) that contains all singletons, the total set, the empty set and is closed under the set-theoretic complement, countable intersections, countable unions. For the concepts of Boolean algebra, complete Boolean algebra and \(\sigma \)-complete Boolean algebra see Definitions 10.8 and 10.4 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10).

  2. 2.

    \(\mathscr {B}({\mathbb R})\) is the set of all measurable subsets of \(\mathbb R\).

  3. 3.

    For a detailed definition of Hilbert space see Definition 10.20 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10).

  4. 4.

    See [3]. After Birkhoff and von Neumann’s pioneering work, different abstract approaches to the foundations of quantum mechanics have been proposed. See, for instance, [5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25].

  5. 5.

    See Definitions 10.7 and 10.4 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10).

  6. 6.

    For the concepts of adjoint operator and self-adjoint operator see Definitions 10.29 and 10.30 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10).

  7. 7.

    The concept of trace-functional is defined in Definition 10.34 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10).

  8. 8.

    For the concepts of eigenvector and eigenvalue see Definition 10.24 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10). Note that all eigenvalues of a self-adjoint operator are real numbers.

  9. 9.

    For the concept of trace-class operator see Definition 10.33 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10).

  10. 10.

    For a more detailed definition of tensor product see Definition 10.37 (in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10).

  11. 11.

    A more general concept of reduced state will be considered in Sect. 2.1

  12. 12.

    For a long time non-destructive measurements have been considered a highly idealized concept. Interestingly enough, nowadays such “ideal” measurements can be experimentally realized by means of different technologies. For instance, one can manipulate some atoms by lasers and one can investigate their spectral features with high precision by means of optical clocks. In these experiments state-detection plays a crucial role: the fluorescence of an atom under laser-illumination reveals its internal quantum state.

  13. 13.

    This definition is based on the so-called Kraus’ first representation theorem (See [20]). It is worth-while recalling that in the literature one can also find a different definition of quantum operation, where condition (1) (\(\sum _j E_j^\dagger E_j = \mathtt{I}\)) is replaced by the weaker condition: \(\mathtt{tr}(\rho \sum _j E_j^\dagger E_j) \le 1\), for every \(\rho \in \mathfrak D(\mathscr {H})\). In such a case, quantum operations are not trace-preserving. At the same time, quantum channels are defined as quantum operations that satisfy the stronger condition \(\sum _j E_j^\dagger E_j = \mathtt{I}\).

  14. 14.

    See [2, 4, 26, 27].

  15. 15.

    See [1, 5,6,7, 9,10,11, 13, 15, 16, 21].

  16. 16.

    The simplest structures are represented by effect algebras, special examples of partial algebras (Definition 10.10 in the Mathematical Survey of Chap. 10). See, for instance, [9,10,11, 13, 15, 16].

  17. 17.

    See, for instance, [1, 4, 10, 11, 24].

  18. 18.

    See, for instance, [10].

  19. 19.

    An example is represented by the orthoarguesian law. See [10, 17].

References

  1. Beltrametti, E., Bugajski, S.: Effect algebras and statistical physical theories. J. Math. Phys. 53(38), 3020–3030 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beltrametti, E., Cassinelli, G.: The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 15. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birkhoff, G., von Neumann, J.: The logic of quantum mechanics. Ann. Math. 37(4), 823–843 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Busch, P., Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P.: The Quantum Theory of Measurement. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cattaneo, G.: A unified framework for the algebra of unsharp quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 36, 3085–3117 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cattaneo, G., Gudder, S.P.: Algebraic structures arising in axiomatic unsharp quantum physics. Found. Phys. 29(10), 1607–1637 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cattaneo, G., Laudisa, F.: Axiomatic unsharp quantum theory (from Mackey to Ludwig). Found. Phys. 24(5), 631–683 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiribella, G., D’Ariano, G.M., Perinotti, P.: Quantum Theory from First Principles: An Informational Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dalla Chiara, M.L., Giuntini, R.: Unsharp quantum logics. Found. Phys. 24, 1161–1177 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalla Chiara, M.L., Giuntini, R., Greechie, R.: Reasoning in Quantum Theory: Sharp and Unsharp Quantum Logics. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Dvurečenskij, A., Pulmannová, S.: New Trends in Quantum Structures. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Foulis, D.J.: A half-century of quantum logic, what have we learned? In: Aerts, D., Pykacz, J. (eds.) Quantum Structures and the Nature of Reality, vol. 7, pp. 1–36. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foulis, D.J., Bennett, M.K.: Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics. Found. Phys. 24(10), 1325–1346 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Foulis, D.J., Greechie, R., Dalla Chiara, M.L., Giuntini, R.: Quantum Logic. In: Trigg, G. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Applied Physics, vol. 15, pp. 229–255. VCH Publishers, Weinheim (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giuntini, R.: Quantum MV algebras. Studia Logica 56(3), 393–417 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Giuntini, R., Greuling, H.: Toward an unsharp language for unsharp properties. Found. Phys. 19(7), 931–945 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greechie, R.: A non-standard quantum logic with a strong set of states. In: Beltrametti, E., van Fraassen, B.C. (eds.) Current Issues in Quantum Logic. Plenum, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gudder, S.P.: A survey of axiomatic quantum mechanics. In: Hooker, C.A. (ed.) The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, vol. II, pp. 323–363. Reidel, Dordrecht (1979)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Jauch, J.M.: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, London (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kraus, K.: States, Effects and Operations. Springer, Berlin (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ludwig, G.: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Mackey, G.: The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Benjamin, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mittelstaedt, P.: Quantum Logic. Reidel, Dordrecht (1978)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Mittelstaedt, P.: Rational Reconstruction of Modern Physics. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Piron, C.: Foundations of Quantum Physics. W.A. Benjamin, Reading (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  26. von Neumann, J.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer, Berlin (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  27. von Neumann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dalla Chiara, M.L., Giuntini, R., Leporini, R., Sergioli, G. (2018). The Mathematical Environment of Quantum Information. In: Quantum Computation and Logic. Trends in Logic, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04471-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics