Abstract
Rectal prolapse is the circumferential, full-thickness intussusception of the rectal wall with protrusion beyond the anal canal. The principles for the surgical management of full-thickness external rectal prolapse can be distilled into four basic objectives: the restoration of anatomy with the aim of improving function, whilst minimising morbidity and avoiding the onset of new symptoms. The plethora of surgical procedures described to treat external rectal prolapse (via both perineal and abdominal approaches) attests to the difficulty of successfully satisfying all four of these goals with one procedure. In general, abdominal rectopexy is considered preferable to perineal procedures, having the advantage of lower recurrence rates and superior improvement of incontinence (Brazzelli et al., Database Syst Rev 2:CD001758, 2000). However, the abdominal approach is invasive and is associated with poor correction (and often induction) of constipation. The less invasive nature of perineal procedures has resulted in their wide use for elderly or medically unfit patients, but at the expense of high recurrence rates and unpredictable recovery of function, particularly incontinence. A laparoscopic approach has been shown to be superior to open rectopexy in a prospective, randomised controlled trial, with improved perioperative morbidity, decreased postoperative pain and reduced length of stay (Solomon et al., Br J Surg 89:35–39, 2002).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brazzelli M, Bachho P, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD001758.
Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg. 2002;89:35–9.
Moschowitz AV. The pathogenesis, anatomy and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1912;15:7–21.
Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlback SO, Holmstrom B. Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1133–41.
DeLancey JO. Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:815–23.
D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse: long-term outcome. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1500–5.
Raymond TM, Dastur JK, Parker MC. Laparoscopic suturing using the “looped knot”. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:256–7.
Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne A, Dixon AR. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Color Dis. 2007;10:138–43.
Boons P, Collinson R, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation. Color Dis. 2010;12:526–32.
D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1919–23.
Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Color Dis. 2011;13:561–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Powar, M.P., Parker, M. (2019). Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse. In: Parker, M., Hohenberger, W. (eds) Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery: Vol.1, Laparoscopic procedures. Springer Surgery Atlas Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05240-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05240-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05239-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05240-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)