Skip to main content

Metrics and Guidelines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transitioning Medical Care
  • 170 Accesses

Abstract

The landscape of transition is complex and variable. There is variability at the level of individuals (whose transition needs may be quite different), at the level of service provision, and in the type of health and social care system. The ability to understand and measure these variables in the process of transition, and how that may relate to the outcome for individuals is important. Such metrics will begin to inform how best to tackle complexity and variation in all these areas. The direction of travel for many adults with long term childhood conditions is largely unknown.

The evidence base for current practice is weak but growing. Guidance needs to be widely applicable—to support a range of individual conditions and circumstances without being so vague as to be unhelpful. Key to informing guidance are outcomes reported by service users (whether patients, their families or others). We must remember that transition from paediatric to adult care needs to include health and social care, psychosocial development, and education. Trying to find a way of measuring process and outcomes will guide the further development of transition planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The Children and Families Act. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/6/contents/enacted. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

  2. Dodge JA, Lewis PA, Stanton M, Wilsher J. Cystic fibrosis mortality and survival in the UK: 1947–2003. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(3):522–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacKenzie T, Gifford AH, Sabadosa K. Longevity of patients with cystic fibrosis in 2000 to 2010 and beyond: survival analysis of the cystic fibrosis foundation patient registry. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(4):233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Watson AR. Non-compliance and transfer from paediatric to adult transplant unit. Pediatr Nephrol. 2000;14:469–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harden PN, Walsh G, Bandler N, et al. Bridging the gap: an integrated paediatric to adult clinical service for young adults with kidney failure. BMJ. 2012;344:e3718.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oakeshott P, Hunt GM, Poulton A, Reid F. Open spina bifida: birth findings predict long-term outcome. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(5):474–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oakeshott P, Reid F, Poulton A, et al. Neurological level at birth predicts survival to the mid-40s and urological deaths in open spina bifida: a complete prospective cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(7):634–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorber J, Salfield SA. Results of selective treatment of spina bifida cystica. Arch Dis Child. 1981;56(11):822–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM. Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol. 1981;126(2):205–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol. 1972;107(3):458–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Malakounides G, Lee F, Murphy F, Boddy SA. Single centre experience: long term outcomes in spina bifida patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(5):585–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stadler D. What has become of them? The careers of the physically handicapped—a model study (German). Rehabilitation (Stuttgart). 1984;23(3):120–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Court JM. Outpatient-based transition services for youth. Pediatrician. 1991;18(2):150–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Academy of Pediatrics. Transition of care provided for adolescents with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 1996;98:1203.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fiorentino L, Datta D, Gentle S, et al. Transition from school to adult life for physically disabled young people. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79:306–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Transition from children’s to adults’ services for young people using health or social care services. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng43. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

  17. Developing and implementing the newcastle adolescent and young adult transitional care service. https://www.nice.org.uk/sharedlearning/developing-and-implementing-the-newcastle-adolescent-and-young-adult-transitional-care-service. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

  18. Transition from children’s to adults’ services. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs140. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

  19. Nagra A, McGinnity PM, Davis N, Salmon AP. Implementing transition: ready steady go. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2015;100:313–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Implementing transition care locally and nationally using the ‘Ready Steady Go’ programme. https://www.nice.org.uk/sharedlearning/implementing-transition-care-locally-and-nationally-using-the-ready-steady-go-programme. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

  21. Brooks AJ, Smith PJ, Cohen R, et al. UK guideline on transition of adolescent and young persons with chronic digestive diseases from paediatric to adult care. Gut. 2017;66(6):988–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones AR, John M, Singh SJ, Williams AR. Transition from paediatric surgery: how many patients do we need to plan for? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98(8):586–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones AR, Williams AR, de Coppi P, Hannon E. Transition in oesophageal atresia. Presented at the annual congress of the British association of paediatric surgeons; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  24. While A, Forbes A, Ullman R, et al. Good practices that address continuity during transition from child to adult care: synthesis of the evidence. Child Care Health Dev. 2004;30(5):439–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schrander-Stumpei C, Sinnema M, van den Hout L, et al. Healthcare transition in persons with intellectual disabilities: General issues, the Maastricht model, and Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007;145C(3):241–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kolhmainen N, McCafferty S, Maniatopoulous G, et al. What constitutes successful commissioning of transition from children’s to adults’ services for young people with long-term conditions and what are the challenges? An interview Study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017;1:e000085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Declaration

Both ARW and ARJ have had formal roles with NICE relating to transition. ARW is a current member of a NICE standing committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alun Williams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Williams, A., Jenkins, A. (2019). Metrics and Guidelines. In: Wood, D., Williams, A., Koyle, M., Baird, A. (eds) Transitioning Medical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05895-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05895-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05893-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05895-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics