Skip to main content

Identification of Competing Destination Brand: The Case of Okinawa Island

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2019

Abstract

In the field of destination branding, some researchers have conducted comparative studies for the development of the customer-based brand equity measurement. Since brand equity is a relative measure, it is required to compare a brand to another to measure its effectiveness. However, the selection process of destinations for the comparison has been highly depending on the subjectivity of researchers. This study proposes to use of online travel reviews to identify a pair of similar destinations addressing what tourists have talked about the destinations by aiming at contributing to developing a reliable brand equity measurement. The study takes Okinawa (Japan) as a case in the destination brand category of “island resort destination”, and the result indicates that Corsica (France) is the most similar destination among nine European destinations. Future research should develop scale items and test the reliability and the validity of them using the two destinations identified in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leicht T (2016) Establishing external validity for consumer-based place brand equity scales: mission impossible or a matter of approach? In: Melewar TC, Dinnie K, Fona C, Dennis C (eds) Conference proceedings of inaugural conference of the international place branding association. Middlesex University, London, pp 248–256

    Google Scholar 

  2. Konecnik M, Gartner WC (2007) Customer-based brand equity for a destination. Ann Tour Res 34(2):400–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boo S, Busser J, Baloglu S (2009) A model of customer-based brand equity and it’s a plication to multiple destinations. Tour Manag 30(2):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yuwo H, Ford J, Purwanegara M (2013) Customer-based brand equity for a destination (CBBETD): the specific case of Bandung City, Indonesia. Organ Mark Emerg Econ 4(1):8–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tasci AD (2018) Testing the cross-brand and cross-market validity of a consumer-based brand equity (CBBE) model for destination brands. Tour Manag 65:143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lassar W, Mittal B, Sharma A (1995) Measuring customer-based brand equity. J Consum Mark 12(4):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mauri AG, Minazzi R (2013) Web reviews influence on expectations and purchasing intentions of hotel potential customers. Int J Hosp Manag 34(1):99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Govers R, Go F (2009) Place branding: Glocal, virtual and physical identities, constructed, imagined and experienced. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchiori E, Cantoni L, Fesenmaier DR (2013) What did they say about us? Message cues and destination reputation in social media. In: Cantoni L, Xiang Z (eds) Information and communication technologies in tourism 2013. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36309-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Aaker DA (1996) Building strong brands. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keller KL (2012) Strategic brand management building, measuring and managing brand equity, 3rd edn. Pearson Education Limited, England, Edingburgh Gate

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aaker DA (1991) Managing brand equity. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yoo B, Donthu N (2001) Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale. J Bus Res 52(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. United Nations Statistics Division (nd) Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/. Accessed 7 Sep 2018

  15. TripAdvisor (nd) About TripAdvisor. https://tripadvisor.mediaroom.com/us-about-us. Accessed 7 Sep 2018

  16. Manning CD, Raghavan P, Schütze H (2017) Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greenacre M, Blasius J (1994) Correspondence analysis in the social sciences: recent developments and applications. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kassambara A (2017) CA - Correspondence Analysis in R: Essentials. http://www.sthda.com/english/articles/31-principal-component-methods-in-r-practical-guide/113-ca-correspondence-analysis-in-r-essentials/. Accessed 10 July 2018

  19. Sartori A, Mottironi C, Corigliano MA (2012) Tourist destination brand equity and internal stakeholders: an empirical research. J Vacat Mark 18(4):327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pike S, Bianchi C, Kerr G, Patti C (2010) Consumer-based brand equity for Australia as a long-haul tourism destination in an emerging market. Int Mark Rev 27(4):434–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Cantoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nakaima, K., Marchiori, E., Cantoni, L. (2019). Identification of Competing Destination Brand: The Case of Okinawa Island. In: Pesonen, J., Neidhardt, J. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05940-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics