Skip to main content

Constitutional and Comparative Analysis of the Catalan Secessionist Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Myths and Realities of Secessionisms

Abstract

The chapter analyzes the constitutional framework in which the Catalan secessionist process has developed. It starts by focusing on international law, particularly on the right to self-determination of peoples as established in the UN treaties and case law, and on the so-called remedial secession, and later sums up the two main foreign experiences of secessionism (Québec and Scotland), as well as two relatively minor cases in Bavaria and in Veneto, highlighting the similarities and the differences in respect to Spain and Catalonia. The barring by the Spanish Constitutional Court in 2014 of the “right to decide” and of any kind of referendum on independence is also discussed. The chapter ends with an assessment of the role the EU has played in the secessionist process, particularly of the issue of whether an independent Catalonia would automatically remain in the EU (applying the so called “internal enlargement”), or rather would leave it, and also of the position of relative neutrality adopted by the Commission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Report of the Commission of Rapporteurs, League of Nations Council, Doc B7 21/68/106, 1921: see https://www.ilsa.org/jessup/jessup10/basicmats/aaland2.pdf.

  2. 2.

    See the Advisory Opinion of the ICJ of 22 July 2010, Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, available at http://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/141/141-20100722-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf.

  3. 3.

    See https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1643/index.do.

  4. 4.

    See http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-31.8/page-1.html.

  5. 5.

    See http://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/travaux-parlementaires/projets-loi/projet-loi-99-36-1.html.

  6. 6.

    See the judgement in http://citoyens.soquij.qc.ca/php/decision.php?g-recaptcha-response=03AL4dnxpgHgNEM8tYPVZIq2YOnHbNBHpaArXntVowcYC5mxlwyb5Zvf--w8_TKvYB6EREx3MgnaZTL5Jpt8KO7YCirAHcyjSFklnRZy18upqLOuv97t8-HvCY0CgCUXUf0k49tFH8wTVDQuvsDaye-oXmUIWhwI9XyD5SeGBzvn4DqCKM9tEvc9CRJnO1g9QFY7TlqXg9iLG219rm_VyRXRRQYZS5KAxGDzHG2HK972hwGx8F1h45VSpSpCuar6ZdGiT4Cvl7uCOaooj8LjalQjIeTOVHT6AbIsAFbzXcJ3RhPJe_7otSK-Y&ID=4C13FAC691EF9203813F4041ACC19CCC.

  7. 7.

    See the official documents in http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/Const_index.html.

  8. 8.

    See http://www.gov.scot/resource/doc/303348/0095138.pdf.

  9. 9.

    See https://www.gov.scot/Publications/2010/02/22120157/2.

  10. 10.

    See the text in https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/313612/scottish_referendum_agreement.pdf.

  11. 11.

    See https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/may/08/david-cameron-defends-decision-scottish-independence-referendum. Courtesy of Guardian News & Media Ltd.

  12. 12.

    See the decision (in German) in http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2016/12/rk20161216_2bvr034916.html.

  13. 13.

    Available in English at http://www.parlament.cat/web/documentacio/altres-versions/resolucions-versions.

  14. 14.

    Available in English at http://www.parlament.cat/web/documentacio/altres-versions/resolucions-versions.

  15. 15.

    An English version is available at http://www.tribunalconstitucional.es/es/jurisprudencia/restrad/Paginas/STC42-2014.aspx.

  16. 16.

    See http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2015/09/17/actualidad/1442481238_663863.html.

  17. 17.

    See “Statement on the events in Catalonia ” from October 2nd 2017, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-17-3626_en.htm.

  18. 18.

    See https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/13/eu-intervention-in-catalonia-would-cause-chaos-juncker-says. Courtesy of Guardian News & Media Ltd.

  19. 19.

    See the article “Carles Puigdemont calls for Catalonia to leave EU”, at https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/puigdemont-calls-for-catalonia-to-leave-eu-zsfj96ph0.

References

  • Advisory Board for the National Transition. 2014. The National Transition of Catalonia. http://presidencia.gencat.cat/web/.content/ambits_actuacio/consells_assessors/catn/informes_publicats/llibre_blanc_angles.pdf (English version).

  • Closa, Carlos. 2016. Secession from a Member State and EU Membership: The View from the Union. European Constitutional Law Review 12 (2): 240–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, Francesco. 2015. La Corte costituzionale sui referendum per l’autonomia e l’indipendenza del Veneto. Non c’è due senza tre. Anche se…. Quaderni Costituzionali (3): 759–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion, Stéphane. 2013. Secession and Democracy: A Canadian Perspective. http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_en/contenido?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_in/zonas_in/europe/stephane-dion-secesion-democracia-secession-democracy-canada.

  • Ferreres Comella, Victor. 2014. The Spanish Constitutional Court Confronts Catalonia’s ‘Right to Decide’ (Comment on the Judgment 42/2014). European Constitutional Law Review 10 (3): 571–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossas Espadaler, Enric. 2014a. Interpretar la política: Comentario a la STC 42/2014, de 25 de marzo, sobre la declaración de soberanía y el derecho a decidir del pueblo de Cataluña. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional (101): 273–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossas Espadaler, Enric. 2014b. Secesión: del proceso eufemístico al constitucional. EL PAÍS, November 25. http://elpais.com/elpais/2014/11/24/opinion/1416842833_782695.html.

  • Galán Galán, Alfredo. 2013. Secesión de Estados y pertenencia a la Unión Europea: Cataluña en la encrucijada. Istituzioni del Federalismo (1): 95–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galán Galán, Alfredo. 2014a. Secesión y pertenencia a la unión europea: de Escocia a Cataluña. http://idpbarcelona.net/docs/blog/secesion.pdf.

  • Galán Galán, Alfredo. 2014b. Del derecho a decidir a la independencia: la peculiaridad del proceso secesionista en Cataluña. Istituzioni del Federalismo (4): 885–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guénette, Dave. 2016. Initier le processus constituant en contexte plurinational – Étude comparative des pouvoirs catalans et québécois de mettre en branle de la procédure de révision constitutionnelle de leur État. Revista de Estudios Autonómicos y Federales (24): 46–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassoti, Eva. 2016. The Sound of One Hand Clapping: Unilateral Declarations of Independence in International Law. German Law Journal 17 (2): 215–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Michael. 2015. The Scottish Independence Referendum and After. Revista de Estudios Autonómicos y Federales (21): 73–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Bofill, Héctor. 2018. Hubris, Constitutionalism, and ‘The Indissoluble Unity of the Spanish Nation’: The Repression of Catalan Secessionist Referenda in Spanish Constitutional Law. I.CON. International Journal of Constitutional Law 17 (forthcoming) .

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinico, Giuseppe. 2017. Identity Conflicts and Secession Before Courts: Three Case Studies. Revista General de Derecho Público Comparado (21): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinico, Giuseppe. 2018. How Can Constitutionalism Deal with Secession in the Age of Populism? The Case of Referendums. Sant’Anna Legal Studies—STALS Research Paper 5/2018. http://www.stals.sssup.it/files/martinico%205%202018%20stals.pdf.

  • Milanovic, Marko. 2017. A Footnote on Secession. https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-footnote-on-secession/.

  • Mueller, Charlotte. 2012. Secession and Self-Determination—Remedial Right Only Theory Scrutinised. Polis Journal 7: 283–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Klaus-Jürgen. 2017. Bavaria: Another Case of a Right to Decide? https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/28277.

  • Plaza, Carmen. 2018. Catalonia’s Secession Process at the Constitutional Court: A Never-Ending Story? European Public Law 24 (3): 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presno Linera, Miguel A. 2015. “Law and Disagreement: el ‘caso de Cataluña en España’”. Diritto Pubblico (1): 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridao, Joan. 2014. La juridificación del derecho a decidir en España. Revista de Derecho Político (91): 91–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridao, Joan. 2018. La aplicación del artículo 155 de la Constitución a Cataluña: Un examen de su dudosa constitucionalidad. Revista Vasca de Administración Pública (111): 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridao, Joan, and Alfonso González Bondía. 2014. La unión europea ante la eventual creación de nuevos estados surgidos de la secesión de estados miembros. Revista de Derecho de la Unión Europea (27): 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roig i Molés, Eduard. 2017. The Catalan Sovereignty Process and the Spanish Constitutional Court: An Analysis of Reciprocal Impacts. Revista Catalana de Dret Públic (54): 24–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero Caro, Francisco Javier. 2017. The Spanish Vision of Canada’s Clarity Act: From Idealization to Myth. Perspectives on Federalism 9 (3): E-133–E-159. http://www.on-federalism.eu/index.php/component/content/article/231-essay/273-the-spanish-vision-of-canadas-clarity-act-from-idealization-to-myth.

  • Sáiz Arnáiz, Alejandro. 2006–2007. Constitución y secesión. Parlamento y Constitución. Anuario (10): 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shikova, Natalija. 2016. Practicing Internal Self-Determination Vis-a-Vis Vital Quests for Secession. German Law Journal 17 (2): 237–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taillon, Patrick. 2014. De la clarté à l’arbitraire: le contrôle de la question et des résultats référendaires par le parlement canadien. Revista de Estudios Autonómicos y Federales (20): 13–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tega, Diletta. 2015. Venezia non è Barcellona. Una via italiana per le rivendicazioni di autonomia? Le Regioni (5–6): 1141–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, Stephen. 2013. Legal Issues Surrounding the Referendum on Independence for Scotland. European Constitutional Law Review 9 (3): 359–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornos Mas, Joaquín. 2014. “El problema catalán: una solución razonable”. El Cronista del Estado Social y Democrático de Derecho (42): 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, Jure. 2010. Remedial Secession in International Law: Theory and (Lack of) Practice. St Antony’s International Review 6 (1): 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, Jure. 2017. Catalonia: The Way Forward Is Comparative Constitutional Rather Than International Legal Argument. https://www.ejiltalk.org/author/jvidmar/.

  • Walker, Neil. 2015. Internal Enlargement in the European Union: Beyond Legalism and Political Expediency. Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2015/32; Europa Working Paper No. 2015/05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2676025 and in http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676025 (later in Carlos Closa (ed.). 2017. Secession from a Member State and Withdrawal from the European Union: Troubled Membership, 32–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  • Weiler, Joseph H.H. 2012. Editorial: Catalonian Independence and the European Union. The European Journal of International Law 23 (4): 910–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H.H. 2014a. Editorial: Scottish Independence and the European Union. I.CON. International Journal of Constitutional Law 12 (3): 507–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Joseph H.H. 2014b. Scotland and the EU: A Comment. UK Constitutional Law Association. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/09/10/debate-j-h-h-weiler-scotland-and-the-eu-a-comment/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Beltrán de Felipe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beltrán de Felipe, M. (2019). Constitutional and Comparative Analysis of the Catalan Secessionist Process. In: Myths and Realities of Secessionisms. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11632-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics