Abstract
In this book, I examine the ways in which participant frameworks, physical environments, activity types, and interactional goals shape how cognitive challenges and strengths are navigated as “our mental states make contact with the world” (Hughes, Thinking through dementia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011: 265)—and, crucially, how these aspects of context impact the self-esteem of individuals with dementia and their conversational partners. To this end, I analyze the language used in everyday conversations, medical visits, memory loss support group meetings, and specially designed art gallery tours through the lens of epistemic discourse analysis (van Dijk, Discourse Studies, 15, 497–500, 2013; Heritage, Research on Language and Social Interaction (ROLSI), 45, 30–52, 2012) in combination with Goffman’s (Interaction ritual. Garden City: Anchor Books, 1967; Relations in public. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1971) and Brown and Levinson’s (Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) insights into face maintenance in everyday social interaction. I explore how individuals’ changes in cognition may impact the faces of these individuals, leaving some to feel ashamed, anxious, or angry; others to feel patronized, infantilized, or overly dependent; and still others to feel threatened in both ways. In this examination, I keep in clear and central focus the important discursive choices made by healthy interactional partners that may end up minimizing or exacerbating these feelings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Ich möchte Sie, so gut ich es kann, bitten, lieber Herr, Geduld zu haben gegen alles Ungelöste in Ihrem Herzen und zu versuchen, die Fragen selbst liebzuhaben…. Forschen Sie jetzt nicht nach den Antworten, die Ihnen nicht gegeben werden können, weil Sie sie nicht leben könnten. Und es handelt sich darum, alles zu leben. Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen. Vielleicht leben Sie dann allmählich, ohne es zu merken, eines fernen Tages in die Antwort hinein (emphasis added).
- 2.
In the interactions represented in the many excerpts in this book, the reader will notice variation in naming practices related to participants across the data collections. Whereas first names are used in memory loss support group and art gallery excerpts, titles plus surnames are used in those related to the medical and assisted living visits. This variation reflects differences in naming practices used within these interactions at the time of recording.
References
Basting, A. D. (2009). Forget memory: Creating better lives for people with dementia. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bayles, K., & Kaszniak, A. (1987). Communication and cognition in normal aging and dementia. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Bayles, K., & Tomoeda, C. K. (2014). Cognitive-communication disorders of dementia: Definition, diagnosis, and treatment. San Diego: Plural PublishingInc.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (1984). Linguistic encounters with handicap. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Davis, B. H. (Ed.). (2005). Alzheimer talk, text and context: Enhancing communication. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Drew, P. (2018). Special issue on “Epistemics – The rebuttal”. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 3–13.
Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. (Eds.). (2006). Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Oxford: Berg.
Folstein, M., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state” a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interaction construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Gordon, C., & Kraut, J. (2017). Interactional sociolinguistics. In B. Vine (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language in the workplace (pp. 3–14). Abingdon: Routledge.
Guendouzi, J., & Davis, B. H. (2013). Dementia discourse and pragmatics. In B. H. Davis & J. Guendouzi (Eds.), Pragmatics in dementia discourse (pp. 1–28). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Guendouzi, J., & Pate, A. (2014). Interactional and cognitive resources in dementia: A perspective from politeness theory. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp. 121–146). New York: Psychology Press.
Hamilton, H. E. (1994). Conversations with an Alzheimer’s patient: An interactional sociolinguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, H. E. (1996). Intratextuality, intertextuality, and the construction of identity as patient in Alzheimer’s disease. Text, 16, 61–90.
Hamilton, H. E. (2003). Glimmers: A journey into Alzheimer’s disease. Ashland: RiverWood Books.
Hamilton, H. E. (2004). Symptoms and signs in particular: The influence of the medical condition on the shape of physician-patient talk. Communication & Medicine, 1(1), 59–70.
Hamilton, H. E. (2005). Epilogue: The prism, the soliloquy, the dance, and the couch – The evolving study of language and Alzheimer’s disease. In B. H. Davis (Ed.), Alzheimer talk, text and context: Enhancing communication (pp. 224–246). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamilton, H. E. (2008). Language and dementia: Sociolinguistic aspects. C. L. J. de Bot (Ed.). Language and the Brain. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL), 28, 91–110.
Hamilton, H. E. (2011). At the intersection of art, Alzheimer’s disease, and discourse: Talk in the surround of paintings. In P. Backhaus (Ed.), Communication in elderly care: Cross-cultural approaches (pp. 166–192). London: Continuum.
Hamilton, H. E., & Baffy, M. (2014). Preparing for a theatrical performance: Writing scripts and shaping identities in an early memory loss support group. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp. 213–244). New York: Psychology Press.
Heritage, J. (2012). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction (ROLSI), 45, 30–52.
Heritage, J. (2018). The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the ‘epistemics of epistemics’ group. Discourse Studies, 20(1), 14–56.
Hughes, J. (2011). Thinking through dementia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Husain, M., & Schott, J. M. (2016). Oxford textbook of cognitive neurology and dementia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutchins, E. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In N. J. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 375–398). Berg: Oxford.
Isaac, A., & Hamilton, H. E. (in press). Agency and epistemic authority in question-answer sequences between art museum guides and visitors diagnosed with dementia. Linguistics Vanguard.
Kempler, D., & Goral, M. (2008). Language and dementia: Neuropsychological aspects. C. L. J. de Bot (Ed.). Language and the Brain. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL), 28, 73–90.
Kindell, J., Keady, J., Sage, K., & Wilkinson, R. (2017). Everyday conversation in dementia: A review of the literature to inform research and practice. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52(4), 392–406.
Kitwood, T. (1993). Towards a theory of dementia care: The interpersonal process. Ageing and Society, 13, 51–67.
Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Leibing, A. (2006). Divided gazes: Alzheimer’s disease, the person within, and death in life. In A. Leibing & L. Cohen (Eds.), Thinking about dementia: Culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility (pp. 240–268). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Lopez de Victoria Rodriguez, P. C. (2016). Narratives of self in older bilingual adults diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D. (2016). Special issue on “The epistemics of Epistemics”. Discourse Studies, 18(5), 493–499.
MacPherson, S., Bird, M., Anderson, K., Davis, T., & Blair, A. (2009). An art gallery access programme for people with dementia: ‘You do it for the moment’. Aging & Mental Health, 13(5), 744–752.
Matthews, M. (2005). Weaving a life: Five people with early stage dementia share their stories. Unpublished PhD dissertation, New York University, New York.
Müller, N., & Schrauf, R. (2014). Conversation as cognition: Reframing cognition in dementia. In R. Schrauf & N. Müller (Eds.), Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement (pp. 3–26). New York: Psychology Press.
Nuckolls, J. B., & Michael, L. (2012). Special issue on “Evidentiality in interaction”. Pragmatics and Society, 3(2), 169–180.
Perkins, L., Whitworth, A., & Lesser, R. (1998). Conversing in dementia: A conversation analytic approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 33–55.
Pope, C., & Davis, B. H. (2011). Finding a balance: The Carolina Conversations Collection. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7, 143–161.
Ramanathan, V. (1997). Alzheimer discourse: Some sociolinguistic dimensions. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Ravdin, L., & Katzen, H. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook on the neuropsychology of aging and dementia. New York: Springer.
Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relationships: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35, 677–705.
Rilke, R. M. (1929). Briefe an einen jungen Dichter. Leipzig: Insel Verlag.
Robinson, J. (2016). Accountability in social interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, E. B., Bannister, K. A., & Anas, A. P. (2009). The dementia narrative: Writing to reclaim social identity. Journal of Aging Studies, 23, 145–157.
Sabat, S. R. (2001). The experience of Alzheimer’s disease: Life through a tangled veil. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 1–2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Schrauf, R., & Müller, N. (Eds.). (2014). Dialogue and dementia: Cognitive and communicative resources for engagement. New York: Psychology Press.
Schütz, A. (1946). The well-informed citizen: An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research, 13(4), 463–478.
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62.
Sidnell, J. (2012). ‘Who knows best?’ Evidentiality and epistemic asymmetry in conversation. Pragmatics and Society, 3, 294–320.
Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 171–177.
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, D. (2004). Interactional sociolinguistics. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (pp. 76–88). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. (2006). Introduction: Discourse, interaction, and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 5–7.
van Dijk, T. (2013). Special issue on “Epistemic discourse analysis”. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 497–499.
van Dijk, T. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocultural approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamilton, H.E. (2019). “Well I hate to admit it but I can’t remember”. In: Language, Dementia and Meaning Making. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12021-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12021-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12020-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12021-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)