Skip to main content

Abundance and Diversity of Wetland Birds: The Case of Dinder National Park, Sudan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agriculture and Ecosystem Resilience in Sub Saharan Africa

Part of the book series: Climate Change Management ((CCM))

Abstract

This study was conducted in Dinder National Park (Sudan). Patterns of bird species diversity, richness, and abundance were documented in four wetland areas inside Dinder National Park, including Ras Amir, Grerisa, Abdel Ghani, and Dabkara Mayas (meadows) during the dry seasons starting 2014 through 2016, and, diversity over this period was badly eroded and under serious threats. Timed-species count (TSC) technique was used for counting birds. Rarefaction curves combined with nonparametric estimators of species richness were used to extrapolate species richness beyond the collected data. The Shannon (H') diversity index and the Simpson (D) index and the evenness index of Pielou (J') were used to assess alpha diversity and diversity within and between sites, respectively. Finally, chi-square goodness of fit test was used to test the H0 that bird species frequencies at each site were equally proportional and their mean numbers across the four sites were not significantly different. Sampling efforts of over 90% was attained in each of the four study sites. A total of 203 bird species about 145 (71%) of which were wetland birds, all belonging to 33 families and 11 orders, were identified from a set of 3753 individuals. The mean number of wetland birds was generally low at all the Mayas except at Ras Amir Maya where some species had relatively higher mean number. The orders Anseriformes (especially Anatidae), Charadriiformes (especially Jacanidae and Charadriidae), Ciconiiformes (especially Ardeidae, Threskiornithidae, and Ciconiidae), Coraciiformes (especially Alcedinidae), Passeriformes (especially Motacillidae and Ploceidae), and Pelecaniformes (especially Phalacrocoracidae) were the most important, in terms of both abundance and species richness. Diversity indices ranged, in descending order, from Grerisa Maya, Ras Amir Maya, Abd el Ghani Maya to Dabkara Maya. There was no clear trend in terms of bird numbers and abundance between sites, though water-rich Mayas seemed to support more birds than the drier ones. Likewise, certain species were found only in some Mayas but not in others such as African jacana (Actophilornis africanus), African darter (Anhinga rufa), long-tailed cormorant (Phalacrocorax africanus), and allies. This study presents baseline data and contributes in important ways to basic knowledge of wetland biodiversity patterns within Dinder National Park which must be protected because they constitute core areas of great conservation importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel Hameed SM, Awad NM, Nimir MB, Hakim SA, Ahmed EO, Hashim IM (1997) Vegetation succession and its effects on wildlife herbivory in the mayas of Dinder National Park. Sudan, Wildlife Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (2006) Ecology: from individual to ecosystems, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ, Collar NJ, Crosby MJ, Heath MF, Imboden C, Johnson TH, Long AJ, Sattersfield AJ, Thirgood SJ (1992) Putting biodiversity on the map: priority areas for global conservation. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby C, Jones M, Marsden S (1998) Expedition field techniques BIRD SURVEYS. Expedition Advisory Center, Royal Geographical Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookhout TA (ed) (1994) Research and management techniques to wildlife habitat, 5th edn. Wildlife Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Both C, Bouwhuis S, Lessells CM, Visser ME (2006) Climate change and population declines in long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441:81–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla M, Gustin M, Celada C (2011) Defining favourable reference values for bird populations in Italy: setting long-term conservation targets for priority species. Bird Conserv Int 21:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley HL, Freckleton RP (2010) Understanding the role of species dynamics in abundance-occupancy relationships. J Ecol 98:645–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton PL (1980) Birds of East Africa: their habitats, status and distribution. East Africa natural history society. Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao ARK, Colwell CWL, Gotelli NJ (2009) Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology 90:1125–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman KA, Reich PB (2007) Land use and habitat gradients determine bird community diversity and abundance in sub urban, rural and reserve landscape of Minnesota, USA. Biol Conserv 135:529–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2013) Estimate S: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. Persistent URL purl.oclc.ort/estimates, University of Connecticut, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, Laroe ET (1977) Classification of wetlands and Deepwater habitats of the United States. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, + 103 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawi MH (1998) Bird Fauna of Dinder National Park, Sudan notes and records. 11:187–203

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong-Boon C (1990) Environmental poblems in Sudan: a reader (part I), The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Dranzoa C (1990) Survival of forest birds in formerly forested areas. Unpublished MSc thesis, Makerere University, Kampala

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans MI (1994) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats, 5th edn. Wildlife Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ (2004) A taxonomic wish-list for community ecology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 359:585–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2010) Estimating species richness. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) Frontiers in measuring biodiversity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson B, Federsel IM (2014) Bumblebees in the city: abundance, species richness and diversity in two urban habitats. J Insect Conserv 18:1185–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley SJK, Hadley AS, Betts M (2012) Acoustic classification of multiple simultaneous bird species: a multi-instance multi-label approach. J Acoust Soc Am 131(6):4640–4650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer O (1999-2011) In: Natural History Museum University of Oslo (ed) PAleontological STatistics, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton AJ (2005) Species diversity or biodiversity? J Environ Manag 75:89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim IM (1984) Meadow use by wild ungulates in Dinder National Park. Ph.D thesis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces

    Google Scholar 

  • Hespenheide HA (1994) An overview of formal studies. In: Bawa KS, Hespenheid HA, Hartshorn GS (eds) Lasaha ecology and natural history of neotropical rainforest. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsworth NW (1968) Dinder National Park. Report to the government of Sudan. No. T4 3457. FAO Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussein MEAE (2015) Birds of Dinder National Park from 2008–2011. Poult Fish Wildl Sci 3:128. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-446X.1000128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid MA, Salih, MHE (2002) Preliminary Survey of the Dinder National Park Fish Fauna, diversity and tentative ichthyomass

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee PY, Rotenberg JT (2005) Relationship between bird species and tree species assemblage in forest habitat of eastern North America. J Biogeogr 32:1139–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino JT, Coddington J, Colwell RK (2002) The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83:689–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino JT, Colwell RK (1997) Biodiversity assessment using structured inventory: capturing the ant fauna of a tropical rain forest. Ecol Appl 7:1263–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Diversity and species abundance model. In: Magurran AE (ed) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Prince Lion University Print

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonson D, Anderson MJ, Benecha HK, Dornelas M, Enquist BJ, Green JL, Green FH (2007) Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol Lett 10:995–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mafabi P (1999) Wetlands and their wildlife. Swara 18(1):15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews GVT (1993) Ramsar convention on wetlands: its history and development. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, v + 120 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilinga P (2016) The olive baboons of Sudan: determinants of structure and survival. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Germany. ISBN 978-659-87171-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno CE, Halffer G (2000) Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves. J Appl Ecol 37:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy DE, Tengecho B (1986) A method of analyzing bird distribution. Afr J Ecol 24:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy DE (1992) Counting birds: a guide to assessing numbers, biomass and diversity of afro tropical birds. African wildlife foundation, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramchandra AM (2013) Diversity and richness of bird species in newly formed habitats of Chandoli National Park in Western Ghats, Maharashtra state, India. Biodivers J 4(1):235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Salah O, Idris E (2013) A note on the birds diversity at two sites in Khartoum, Sudan. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci 5(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberg S, King DI (2008) Are shrubland birds edge specialists. Ecol Appl 18(6):1325–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schowalter TD (2006) Community structure. In: Schowalter TD (ed) Insect ecology: an ecosystem approach. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp 251–282

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon GS, Okoth EO (2016) Species richness and abundance of birds in and around Nimule National Park, South Sudan. ScieLett; 2015023 - SL (online first)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson T, Fanshawe J (2002) Birds of East Africa. T & A D Poyser Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stireman JOI (2008) α and β diversity of a Tachinid parasitoid community over space and time. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:362–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakare UG, Zade VS (2011) Diversity, abundance and species composition of water beetles (Coleoptera; Dytiscidae, Hydrophilidae and Gyminidae) in Kolkas region of Melghat. Tiger Reserve, Central Indiana. Acad J Entomol 4:64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1994) Convention on Wetlands of international importance. Ramsar, 2.2. 1971., as amended by the Protocol of 3.12.1982 and the Amendments of 25.5.1987,--UNESCO. Office of International Standards and Legal Affairs, Paris, 3 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham MJ, Evans KL (2004) The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes. Ibis 146(2):210–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The assistance and encouragement of Professor Ibrahim Mohammed Hashim, of the Wildlife Research Center (Shambat), is highly appreciated. You not only supported the initial idea but offered invaluable advice too. Thanks are also due to the University of Juba administration for providing logistics and financial assistance. Last but not least, we thank the different individuals who facilitated our efforts in one way or the other in carrying out this study, especially, the Wildlife Authority for permitting us to work in the park.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moilinga, P.T.D., Hassan, T.A. (2019). Abundance and Diversity of Wetland Birds: The Case of Dinder National Park, Sudan. In: Bamutaze, Y., Kyamanywa, S., Singh, B., Nabanoga, G., Lal, R. (eds) Agriculture and Ecosystem Resilience in Sub Saharan Africa. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12974-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics