Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Governance Through Voluntary Sustainability Standards: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Responsibility and Sustainability in India

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Indian Management ((PAIM))

Abstract

Regulation of supply chains and associated actors has emerged as a predominant theme with the institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and sustainable development. Private, voluntary transnational standards and industry and corporate codes of conduct have grown in numbers, geographic spread and coverage across a range of commodities, products, services, themes and industry sectors. The phenomena of multi-stakeholder-based and certifiable voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) are amongst a class of voluntary regulatory approaches and a new model of governance. This chapter sets the context and lays the plan for the book. Specifically, it outlines the context for examination of the experience of VSS in India and broadly reflects on how the voluntary governance landscape is shaping in India and the roles played by policymakers, businesses and civil society organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Four goals of ISEAL are to improve the impacts of sustainability standards, define credibility for these standards, improve their effectiveness, and increase their uptake globally, and in developing countries in particular (ISEAL 2017).

  2. 2.

    The State of Sustainability Initiatives Review reports annually on systems and market trends across standards initiatives operating across key commodity sectors, which account for a substantial trade value. Also, the reports claim that the average annual growth rate of standard-compliant production across all commodity sectors in 2012 was 41%, significantly outpacing the annual average growth of 2% in the corresponding conventional commodity markets.

  3. 3.

    WHO Global Air Pollution Database (with data on more than 4000 cities in 100 countries), released in May 2018, revealed that India has 14 out of the 15 most polluted cities in the world in terms of PM 2.5 concentrations (ToI 2018).

References

  • Arora, B. 2017. Multi-stakeholder Initiatives: Journey and the Future. Annual Review of Social Partnerships 2017 (12): 134–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. India and the OECD Working Party for Responsible Business Conduct: Finding Synergies. In OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: A Glass Half Full, 105–117. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, T. 2007. Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Condition. American Journal of Sociology 113 (2): 297–351. https://doi.org/10.1086/518871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018a. Transnational Corporations and Global Governance. Annual Review of Sociology 44 (1): 145–165. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. Rules Without Rights: Land, Labor, and Private Authority in the Global Economy. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, T., S. Koos, H. Samel, G. Setrini, and N. Summers. 2015. Looking Behind the Label: Global Industries and the Conscientious Consumer. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, T., W.H. Reinicke, and J.M. Witte. 2004. Multisectoral Networks in Global Governance: Towards a Pluralistic System of Accountability. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D., and A. Prakash. 2014. The United Nations Global Compact: An Institutionalist Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 122 (2): 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., G. Jackson, and D. Matten. 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance. Socio-Economic Review 10 (1): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad, R., and J. Cavanagh. 1999. The Corporate Accountability Movement: Lessons & Opportunities. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 23: 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., and B. Jacobsson. 2000. A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., A. Rasche, and D. Seidl. 2012. The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies. Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 613–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, B.W., G. Auld, and D. Newsom. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CII and MoMSME. 2018. Theme Paper on Global Value Chains Expanding Boundaries of Indian MSMEs. Accessed December 29, 2018. http://ciisme.in/pdf/MSME-report-theme-paper.pdf.

  • Coen, D., and T. Pegram. 2015. Wanted: A Third Generation of Global Governance Research. Governance 28 (4): 417–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. General Introduction. Major Works Collection: Global Governance II. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Towards a Third Generation of Global Governance Scholarship. Global Policy 9 (1): 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, S.O. 2015. Alternative Futures of Global Governance: Scenarios and Perspectives from the Global South. Foresight 17 (2): 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R.A. 1973. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, K. 2014. Globalization and Standards: Issues and Challenges in Indian Business. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, N. 2018. Why Being a Part of the Global Value Chain Matters for Indian SME. Accessed December 29, 2018. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/sme-sector/why-being-a-part-of-the-global-value-chain-matters-for-indian-smes/articleshow/67188819.cms.

  • Djelic, M.L., and F. den Hond. 2014. Introduction: Multiplicity and Plurality in the World of Standards: Symposium on Multiplicity and Plurality in the World of Standards. Business and Politics 16 (1): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2013-0034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.L., A. Kourula, J. Moon, and C. Wickert. 2016. Organization Studies Call for Papers for a Special Issues on Government and the Governance of Business Conduct: Implications for Management and Organization. Organization Studies 37 (80): 1193–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M.-L., and K. Sahlin-Andersson. 2006. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Draude, A. 2017. The Agency of the Governed in Transfer and Diffusion Studies. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2 (5): 577–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, M.B., and C. Jones. 2010. Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (1): 114–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DW. 2017. Climate Change—India Battles to Balance Economy and Environment. Accessed December 28, 2018. http://www.dw.com/en/climate-change-india-battles-to-balance-economy-and-environment/a-41222773.

  • Ferraro, F., D. Etzion, and J. Gehman. 2015. Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited. Organization Studies 36 (3): 363–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorini, M., B. Hoekman, M. Jansen, P. Schleifer, O. Solleder, R. Taimasova, and J. Wozniak. 2018. Institutional Design of Voluntary Sustainability Standards Systems: Evidence from a New Database. Development Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12379.

  • Fiorini, M., P. Schleifer, and R. Taimasova. 2017. Social and Environmental Standards: From Fragmentation to Coordination. Geneva: International Trade Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, P., and E. Havice. 2016. The Rise of Territorial Eco-certifications: New Politics of Transnational Sustainability Governance in the Fishery Sector. Geoforum 69: 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, L., and T. Conzelmann. 2015. Fragmented or Cohesive Transnational Private Regulation of Sustainability Standards? A Comparative Study. Regulation & Governance 9 (3): 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, L., and A. Kolk. 2007. Global Rule-Setting for Business: A Critical Analysis of Multi-stakeholder Standards. Organization 14 (5): 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407080305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D.U., A. Rasche, and S. Waddock. 2011. Accountability in a Global Economy. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1): 23–44. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20112112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosscurt, C., A. de Groot, and V. Fobelets. 2016. The True Price of Cotton from India Joint Report by IDH and True Price. Accessed December 27, 2018. http://www.standardsimpacts.org/sites/default/files/True%20Price%20of%20Cotton%20India.pdf.

  • Gulbrandsen, L.H. 2010. Transnational Environmental Governance: The Emergence and Effects of the Certification of Forests and Fisheries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P.M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T., and D. Held. 2011. Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T., and L. Coenen. 2015. The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Review, Synthesis and Reflections on an Emergent Research Field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haufler, V. 2003. New Forms of Governance: Certification Regimes as Social Regulations of the Global Market. In Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification, 237–247. Remagen-Oberwinter: Forstbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-regulation in a Global Economy. Carnegie Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISEAL. 2017. Sustainability Standards in India: Benefits and Impacts. Accessed December 24, 2018. http://www.standardsimpacts.org/resources-reports/infographic-india-benefits-and-impacts-sustainability-standards-2017.

  • Kant, A. 2018. Export or Perish: Why India Must Achieve a Quantum Jump in Exports to Drive Growth. Accessed December 28, 2018. https://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/export-or-perish-why-india-must-achieve-a-quantum-jump-in-exports-to-drive-growth/.

  • King, A.A., M.J. Lenox, and A. Terlaak. 2005. The Strategic Use of Decentralized Institutions: Exploring Certification with the ISO 14001 Management Standard. Academy of Management Journal 48 (6): 1091–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., R. Van Tulder, and C. Welters. 1999. International Codes of Conduct and Corporate Social Responsibility: Can Transnational Corporations Regulate Themselves? Transnational Corporations 8 (1): 143–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. 2008. Internationalization of Indian Enterprises: Patterns, Strategies, Ownership Advantages, and Implications. Asian Economic Policy Review 3 (2): 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., and A.S. Gaur. 2007. Internationalization of Indian Firms: Regionalization Patterns and Impact on Performance. In Regional Aspects of Multinationality and Performance, 201–219. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, A., R. Mudambi, H. Saranga, and A. Tripathy. 2012. Catch-up Strategies in the Indian Auto Components Industry: Domestic Firms’ Responses to Market Liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies 43 (4): 368–395. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipziger, D. 2017. The Corporate Responsibility Code Book. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lernoud, J., J. Potts, G. Sampson, S. Garibay, M. Lynch, V. Voora, H. Willer, and J. Wozniak. 2017. The State of Sustainable Markets: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2017. Geneva: ITC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lernoud, J., J. Potts, G. Sampson, B. Schlatter, G. Huppe, V. Voora, H. Willer, J. Wozniak, and D. Dang. 2018. The State of Sustainable Markets: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2018. Geneva: ITC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lernoud, J., J. Potts, G. Sampson, V. Voora, H. Willer, and J. Wozniak. 2016. The State of Sustainable Markets: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2015. Geneva: ITC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. 2011. Regulation and Regulatory Governance. In Handbook on the Politics of Regulation, vol. 1, 1–25. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. 2008. Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. Academy of Management Review 33 (4): 943–963. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.34422006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., and R. Kaplan. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility and Theories of Global Governance: Strategic Contestation in Global Issue Arenas. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, and D.S. Siegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P., and A. Lindgreen. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Value Chains: Where are We Now and Where are We Going? Journal of Business Ethics 123 (1): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1796-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S., and J. Reinecke. 2016. A Modular Governance Architecture In-The-Making: How Transnational Standard-Setters Govern Sustainability Transitions. Research Policy 45 (3): 618–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, W., B. van der Linden, and M. Wörsdörfer. 2017. How to Assess the Democratic Qualities of a Multi-stakeholder Initiative from a Habermasian Perspective? Deliberative Democracy and the Equator Principles Framework. Journal of Business Ethics: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3532-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, A., and J. Wouters. 2018. Explaining New Models of Global Voluntary Regulation: What can Organisational Studies Contribute? Global Policy 9 (1): 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J.A. 2002. Competitive Advantages of the Latecomer Firm: A Resource-Based Account of Industrial Catch-up Strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19 (4): 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020586223665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattli, W., and T. Büthe. 2003. Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power? World Politics 56 (1): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2004.0006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., A. Crane, and D. Matten. 2011. Corporations and Citizenship in New Institutions of Global Governance. In The Responsible Corporation in a Global Economy, 203–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., M.V.P. Gomes, and P. Perez-Aleman. 2016. Transnational Governance Regimes in the Global South: Multinationals, States and NGOs as Political Actors. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas 56 (4): 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020160402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadvi, K., and F. Wältring. 2004. Making Sense of Global Standards. In Local Enterprises in the Global Economy: Issues of Governance and Upgrading, ed. H. Schmitz, 53–94. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, J., and B. Pritchard. 2011. Value Chain Struggles: Institutions and Governance in the Plantation Districts of South India. Vol. 93. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña, A.M. 2016. Transnational Governance and South American Politics: The Political Economy of Norms. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, A., A. Kourula, and R. Levitt. 2014. Balancing Act: Government Roles in an Energy Conservation Network. Research Policy 43 (6): 1067–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Roles within the Structure: Interorganizational Roles in an Environmental Alliance Network. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, S., P. Gibbon, and J. Vestergadd. 2011. Governing through Standards: Origins, Drivers and Limitations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, J., M. Lynch, A. Wilkings, G. Huppé, M. Cunningham, and V. Voora. 2014. The State of Sustainability Initiatives Review 2014: Standards and the Green Economy, 332. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., F. De Bakker, and J. Moon. 2013. Complete and Partial Organizing for Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4): 651–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1824-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, M., and L. DeNardis. 2015. Multistakeholderism: Anatomy of an Inchoate Global Institution. International Theory 7 (3): 572–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A.M., D. Reed, and P. Utting, eds. 2013. Business Regulation and Non-state Actors: Whose Standards? Whose Development? Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, J., and S. Ansari. 2016. Taming Wicked Problems: The Role of Framing in the Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management Studies 53 (3): 299–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinicke, W.H. 1997. Global Public Policy. Foreign Affairs 76: 127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz-Hoffmann, C., B. Hansmann, and S. Klose. 2014. Voluntary Sustainability Standards: Measuring their Impact. In Voluntary Standard Systems, 133–143. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, G., and V. Bitzer. 2015. The Emergence of Southern Standards in Agricultural Value Chains: A New Trend in Sustainability Governance? Ecological Economics 120: 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, G.N., and A. Jha. 2018. Agri Start-ups: Innovation for Boosting the Future of Agriculture in India. Accessed December 22, 2018. http://ficci.in/spdocument/23049/Agri-start-ups-Knowledge-report-ficci.pdf.

  • Slager, R., J.-P. Gond, and J. Moon. 2012. Standardization as Institutional Work: The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard. Organization Studies 33 (5–6): 763–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., and D. Feldman. 2003. Company Codes of Conduct and International Standards: An Analytical Comparison. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R. 2013. Disentangling Governance: A Synoptic View of Regulation by Government, Business and Civil Society. Policy Sciences 46 (4): 387–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Times of India (ToI). 2017. India to Overtake Japan to Become Third Largest Economy by 2028: Report. Accessed December 23, 2018. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/india-to-overtake-japan-to-become-third-largest-economy-by-2028-report/articleshow/61631681.cms.

  • ———. 2018. 14 of World’s 15 Most Polluted Cities in India. Accessed December 26, 2018. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/14-of-worlds-15-most-polluted-cities-in-india/articleshow/63993356.cms.

  • Töller, A.E. 2017. Voluntary Regulation by the Pharmaceutical Industry—Which Role for the Shadow of Hierarchy and Social Pressure? European Policy Analysis 3 (1): 48–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P. 2002. Regulating Business Via Multistakeholder Initiatives: A Preliminary Assessment. http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/35F2BD0379CB6647C1256CE6002B70AA/$file/uttngls.pdf.

  • Utting, P., and J. Clapp. 2008. Corporate Accountability and Sustainable Development. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P., and J. Marques, eds. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility and Regulatory Governance: Towards Inclusive Development? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, A., and G.Q. Bull. 2014. Mapping Research Topics and Theories in Private Regulation for Sustainability in Global Value Chains. Journal of Business Ethics 124 (4): 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1889-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijen, F. 2014. Means Versus Ends in Opaque Institutional Fields: Trading Off Compliance and Achievement in Sustainability Standard Adoption. Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 302–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. 2012. The World’s Hunger for Public Goods. Financial Times, January 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., and M. Wright. 2015. Corporations and New Statism: Trends and Research Priorities. The Academy of Management Perspectives 29 (2): 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2018. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2018: Piecing Together the Poverty Puzzle. Accessed December 30, 2018. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30418/9781464813306.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Bimal Arora, Pawan Budhwar & Divya Jyoti

Authors
  1. Bimal Arora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pawan Budhwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Divya Jyoti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divya Jyoti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Bimal Arora

  2. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Pawan Budhwar

  3. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Divya Jyoti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arora, B., Budhwar, P., Jyoti, D. (2019). Governance Through Voluntary Sustainability Standards: An Introduction. In: Arora, B., Budhwar, P., Jyoti, D. (eds) Business Responsibility and Sustainability in India. Palgrave Studies in Indian Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13716-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation