Abstract
The suspicion that a theological framework informs the leftist revolutionary projects was used to denounce them as crypto religious movements with otherworldly objectives. Evidence from the protocols recorded by Swetlana Alexijewitsch suggests that the post-soviet experience is indeed characterized by a feeling of lost faith in some transcendent goal. I argue that the Russian revolution inherited theological conceptions from the Hegelian concept of history. Contrary to widespread diagnosis, however, such a heritage draws more on the political expertise present in the theological tradition than establishing a transcendent knowledge about the course of history. Hegel and the Marxists knew rather well that an historical project such as a revolution presupposes a goal that is present in the actual world but aims at the profound transformation of this very actuality. Ideas as freedom and equality evoke the vision of a world that is delivered from domination and exploitation. As the religious movements before them, the revolutionaries had to create a community that was devoted to their historical aim in order to reach deliverance from the actual ills. The communist party was the failed attempt to create a militant organization with such universal pretensions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The English translation reformulates this passage.
References
Agamben, Giorgio. The Church and the Kingdom. London, New York, and Calcutta: Seagull Books, 2012.
Alexievich, Svetlana. Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets. New York: Random House, 2017.
Bakunin, Mikhail. “L’internationale et Mazzini.” In Œuvres completes de Bakounine, vol. 1: Michel Bakounine et l’Italie 1871–1872, edited by Arthur Lehning, 19–77. Paris: Éditions Champ Libre, 1973.
Berdiaev, Nikolai. “Philosophical Verity and Intelligentsia Truth.” In Vekhi: Landmarks: A Collection of Articles About the Russian Intelligentsia by Nikolai Berdiaev et al., translated and edited by Marshall S. Shatz and Judith E. Zimmerman, 17–49. Armonk, NY and London: Sharpe (Routledge), 1994.
Bloch, Ernst, and Theodor W. Adorno. “Etwas fehlt… Über die Widersprüche der utopischen Sehnsucht.” In Tendenz-Latenz-Utopie, edited by Ernst Bloch, 350–368. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985.
Bloch, Ernst, and Theodor W. Adorno. “Something’s Missing: A Discussion Between Ernst Bloch and Theodor W. Adorno on the Contradictions of Utopian Longing.” In The Utopian Function of Art and Literature. Selected Essays by Ernst Bloch, 1–17. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press, 1988.
Bulgakov, Sergei. “Apokaliptika i sotsializm: religiozno-filosofskie paralleli.” In Sochineniia, vol. 2, 368–434. Moscow: Nauka, 1993.
Bulgakov, Sergei. “Heroism and Asceticism: Reflections on the Religious Nature of the Russian Intelligentsia.” In Vekhi: Landmarks: A Collection of Articles About the Russian Intelligentsia by Nikolai Berdiaev et al., translated and edited by Marshall S. Shatz and Judith E. Zimmerman, 17–49. Armonk, NY and London: Sharpe (Routledge), 1994.
Gorki, Maxim. “La Question Religieuse.” Mercure de France, April 15, 1907, 592–594.
Groys, Boris. “Russian Cosmism and the Technology of Immortality.” In Russian Cosmism, edited by Boris Groys, 1–16. Cambridge, MA: e-flux–MIT Press, 2018.
Löwith, Karl. Meaning in History. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1949.
Löwith, Karl. Weltgeschichte und Heilsgeschehen. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2004.
Lunacharsky, Anatoly. Religiia i sotsializm, vol. 1. Saint Petersburg: Shipovnik, 1908.
Marx, Karl. “Contribution to Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law. Introduction.” In Collected Works, vol. 3, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, 175–187. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1975.
Plékhanoff, Georges. “La Question Religieuse.” Mercure de France, April 15, 1907, 617–619.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmidt, C. (2020). Revolution and Salvation. In: Telios, T., Thomä, D., Schmid, U. (eds) The Russian Revolution as Ideal and Practice. Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14237-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14237-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14236-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14237-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)