Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Present Status of Evolution Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution Education Re-considered

Abstract

Evolution is widely seen as the central, key, unifying framework of biology. Yet many school-aged students and adults understand relatively little of the theory of evolution, for a whole range of reasons ranging from the cognitive difficulty of some of the central concepts to rejection of certain key ideas, whether consciously or unconsciously. Prior to this volume, there have been surprisingly few studies of research-based interventions that attempt to use existing knowledge to propose new pedagogies to try to teach evolution to learners more successfully, whether in schools or elsewhere. Successful learning here might be understood as cognitive gains about evolution, as acceptance of evolution or as an increased desire to continue to learn about it. In this chapter, we review the existing field of evolution education , discussing the reasons why such understanding is limited, whether for cognitive, socio-cultural or affective reasons (Jones & Reiss in Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism. Peter Lang, New York, 2007; Rosengren et al. in Evolution challenges integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012; Kampourakis in Understanding evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014; Tracy, Hart and Martens in PLoS ONE, 6(3): e17349, 2011; Newall in School Science Review, 99(3670): 61–66, 2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham, J. K., Meir, E., Perry, J., Herron, J. C., Maruca, S., & Stal, D. (2009). Addressing Undergraduate Student Misconceptions about Natural Selection with an Interactive Simulated Laboratory. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 2, 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0142-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akyol, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., & Traynor, A. (2012). Modeling the interrelationships among pre-service science teachers’ understanding and acceptance of evolution, their views on nature of science and self-efficacy beliefs regarding teaching evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 937–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alters, B. J. (2005). Teaching Biological Evolution in Higher Education. Methodological, Religious, and Nonreligious Issues. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Barlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alters, B. J., & Nelson C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 56(10), 1891–1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2006). Evolution on the front line: An abbreviated guide for teaching evolution (Project 2061). Received from http://www.project2061.org/publications/guides/evolution.pdf.

  • Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2006). On developing content-oriented theories taking biological evolution as an example. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. M., Kalinowski, S. T., & Leonard, M. J. (2011). “Are humans evolving?” A classroom discussion to change student misconceptions regarding natural selection. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 4, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0343-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasiou, K., & Papadopoulou, P. (2012). Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: Knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 903–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.586072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baalmann, W., Frerichs, V., Weitzel, H., Gropengießer, H., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Schülervorstellungen zu Prozessen der Anpassung: Ergebnisse einer Interviewstudie im Rahmen der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 10(1), 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardapurkar, A. (2008). Do students see the “selection” in organic evolution? A critical review of the causal structure of student explanations. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0048-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, D. A., DeWitt-Smith, S., & Donovan, S. S. S. (2005). The tree-thinking challenge. Science, 310(5750), 979–980. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1117727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley, P. M. (2004). Middle school student learning in evolution: Are current standards achievable? The American Biology Teacher, 66(9), 604–612. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggrow, E. P., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Students’ mental models of evolutionary causation: Natural selection and genetic drift. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 5, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0432-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti, A. E., Toneatti, L., & Rosati, V. (2010). Children’s conceptions about the origin of species: A study of Italian children’s conceptions with and without instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 506–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizzo, N. M. V. (1994). From down house landlord to Brazilian high school students: what has happened to evolutionary knowledge on the way? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumby, M. N. (1979). Problems in learning the concept of natural selection. Journal of Biological Education, 13(2), 119–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumby, M. N. (1981). The use of problem-solving in meaningful learning in biology. Research in Science Education, 11(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68, 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730680412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2006). Biologie (6. Auflage). München: Pearson Education (p. 513). Deutschland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, R., & Sá‐Pinto, A. (2014). Erratum: Early evolution of evolutionary thinking: teaching biological evolution in elementary schools. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0005-4.

  • Catley, K. M., Lehrer, R., & Reiser, B. (2005). Tracing a prospective learning progression for developing understanding of evolution. Paper commissioned by National Academies Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catley, K. M., & Novick, L. R. (2009). Digging deep: Exploring college students’ knowledge of macroevolutionary time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catley, K. M., Phillips, B. C., & Novick, L. R. (2013). Snakes and eels and dogs! Oh, my! Evaluating high school students’ tree-thinking skills: An entry point to understanding evolution. Research in Science Education, 43, 2327–2348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9359-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Kristensen, A., & Roscoe, R. (2012). Misunderstanding emergent causal mechanism in natural selection. In S. Rosengren, S. Brem, & G. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challengens: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 145–173). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deadman, J., & Kelly, P. (1978). What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics? Journal of Biological Education, 12(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1978.9654169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demastes, S. S., Settlage, J., & Good, R. (1995). Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education [DfE]. (2014). National Curriculum. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-curriculum.

  • Engel Clough, E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985). How Secondary Students Interpret Instances of Biological Adaptation. Journal of Biology Education, 19(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1985.9654708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. M. (2000). The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: A Journal of Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 221–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. M., Szymanowski, K., Smith, P. H., & Rosengren, K. S. (2005). Overcoming an essentialist bias: From metamorphosis to evolution. Atlanta, GA: In Biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A. N., Gram, W., Frazier, B. N., Tare, M., Thompson, S., et al. (2010). A conceptual Guide to Natural History Museum Visitors’ Understanding of Evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 326–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1231–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, D., Tröbst, S., & Harms, U. (2017). University students’ conceptual knowledge of randomness and probability in the context of evolution and mathematics. CBE-Life Sciences Education (LSE), 16(2), 1–16, ar38. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C., & Roseman, J. E. (2011). Assessing middle and high school students’ understanding of evolution with standards-based items. In Annual Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin-Doxas, K., & Klymkowsky, M. W. (2008). Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: Lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). CBE – Life Science Education, 7, 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A. (2004). Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(9), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1992). Die Entdeckung der Tiefenzeit: Zeitpfeil und Zeitzyklus in der Geschichte unserer Erde (p. 15). München: Carl Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, D., & Hamdorf, E. (2011). Evolution: Verbreitete Fehlvorstellungen zu einem zentralen Thema In D. Dreesmann, D. Graf & K. Witte (Hrsg.), Evolutionsbiologie: Moderne Themen für den Unterricht (S. 32). Heidelberg: Springer AkademischerVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, D., & Soran, H. (2011). Einstellung und Wissen von Lehramtsstudierenden zur Evolution – ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und der Türkei. In D. Graf (Ed.), Evolutionstheorie – Akzeptanz und Vermittlung im europäischen Vergleich (pp. 141–162). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, B. W. (2009). Practitioner research improved my students’ understanding of evolution by natural selection in an introductory biology course. Teaching issues and experiments in ecology, Vol. 6: Research #4. Retrieved from http://tiee.ecoed.net/vol/v6/research/grant/.

  • Greene, E. D. (1990). The logic of university students’ misunderstanding of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(9), 875–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, T. R. (2008). Understanding evolutionary trees. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 1(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0035-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 2,156–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Großschedl, J., Konnemann, C., & Basel, N. (2014). Pre-service biology teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory and their preference for its teaching. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(18), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0018-z.

  • Ha, M., Haury, D. L., & Nehm, R. H. (2012). Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldén, O. (1988). The evolution of the species: pupil perspectives and school perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, U., Mayer, J., Hammann, M., Bayrhuber, H., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Kerncurriculum und Standards für den Biologieunterricht in der gymnasialen Oberstufe. In H.-E. Tenorth (Hrsg.), Biologie, Chemie, Physik, Geschichte, Politik. Expertisen – im Auftrag der KMK (S. 22–84). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illner, R. (2000). Einfluss religiöser Schülervorstellungen auf die Akzeptanz der Evolutionstheorie (Dissertation). Universität Oldenburg. Abgerufen von http://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/388/1/421.pdf.

  • Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1996). Changes in students’ understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8%3c879:AID-TEA4%3e3.0.CO;2-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories?: A classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Fernández-Pérez, J. (1987). Selection or adjustment? Explanations of university biology students for natural selection problems. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (vol. II, pp. 224–232). Ithaca, NY: Department of Education, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannsen, M., & Krüger, D. (2005). Schülervorstellungen zur Evolution - eine quantitative Studie. Berichte des Instituts für Didaktik der Biologie, 14, 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L., & Reiss, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, E. (1975). The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology-teacher education. Journal of Biological Education, 9(6), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1975.9654037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski, S. T., Leonard, M. J., & Andrews, T. M. (2010). Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of DNA. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-12-0088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2014). Understanding evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K., Pavlidi, V., Papadopoulou, M., & Palaiokrassa, E. (2012). Children’s teleological intuitions: What kind of explanations do 7–8 year olds give for the features of organisms, artefacts and natural objects? Research of Science Education, 42(4), 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9219-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9075-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: A basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence. Science & Education, 18(10), 1313–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9171-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattmann, U. (1995). Konzeption eines naturgeschichtlichen Biologieunterrichts: Wie Evolution Sinn macht. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 1, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattmann, U. (2005). Lernen mit anthropomorphen Vorstellungen? - Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen zur Didaktischen Rekonstruktion in der Biologie. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 11, 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., & Komorek, M. (1997). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaft, 3(3), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, U. (2006). Evolutionsbiologie (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, N. (2012). Akzeptanz, Vorstellungen und Wissen von Schülerinnen und Schülern der Sekundarstufe I zu Evolution und Wissenschaft (Dissertation). Technische Universität Dortmund. Aufgerufen von https://eldorado.tu-dortmund.de/bitstream/2003/29476/1/Dissertation_Lammert.pdf.

  • Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011). The foundations: How education major influences basic science knowledge and pseudoscience beliefs. In Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy (pp. 1–16). IEEE. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853//421-1500-2-PB.pdf Gesehen 21.07.2015.

  • MacFadden, B. J., Dunckel, B. A., Ellis, S., Dierking, L. D., Abraham-Silver, L., Kisiel, J., et al. (2007). Natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. BioScience, 57(10), 875–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVaugh, N. K., Birchfield, J., Lucero, M. M., & Petrosino, A. J. (2011). Evolution education: Seeing the forest for the trees and focusing our efforts on the teaching of evolution. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 4, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0297-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, W. E., & Scott, E. C. (2010). Why are there still monkeys? Evolution: Education & Outreach, 3, 573–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0293-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meir, E., Perry, J., Herron, J. C., & Kingsolver, J. (2007). College students’ misconceptions about evolutionary trees. The American Biology Teacher, 69(7), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69%5b71:CSMAET%5d2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. In J. H. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 3–18). Abington, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science-New York then Washington-, 313(5788), 765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. (1997). On the molecular theory of evolution. In M. Ridley (Ed.), evolution (p. 390). Oxforf: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L., Culp, R., Bunn, S., Burkhart, R., Shetlar, R., Nixon, K., & Waldron, J. (2009). Teaching evolution concepts to early elementary school students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(3), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0148-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Beggrow, E. P., Opfer, J. E., & Ha, M. (2012). Reasoning about natural selection: Diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS instrument. The American Biology Teacher, 74(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2012.74.2.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Poole, T. M., Lyford, M. E., Hoskins, S. G., Carruth, L., Ewers, B. E., & Colberg, P. J. S. (2009). Does the segregation of evolution in biology textbooks and introductory courses reinforce students’ faulty mental models of biology and evolution? Evolution: Educations and Outreach, 2, 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0100-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Rector, M. A., & Ha, M. (2010). “Force-Talk” in evolutionary explanation: Metaphors and misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0282-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, R. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science and Teacher Education, 18, 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 1131–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Schonfeld, I., & The, S. (2010b). Future of natural selection knowledge measurement: a reply to Anderson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubrand, C., & Harms, U. (2017). Tackling the difficulties in learning evolution: Effects of adaptive self-explanation prompts. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1233129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newall, E. (2017). Evolution, insight and truth? School Science Review, 99(367), 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebert, K., & Gropengießer, H. (2015). Understanding starts in the Mesocosm: Conceptual metaphor as a framework for external representations in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 903–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2006). Interpreting hierarchical structure: Evidence from cladograms in biology. In D. Barker-Plummer, R. Cox & N. Swoboda (Eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 4045, pp. 176–180). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, L. R., Schreiber, E. G., & Catley, K. M. (2014). Deconstructing evolution education: The relationship between micro- and macro evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(6), 759–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Intuitive ideas and scientific explanations as parts of students’ developing understanding of biology: the case of evolution. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B. C., Novick, L. R., Catley, K. M., & Funk, D. J. (2012). Teaching tree thinking to college students: It’s not as easy as you think. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 5, 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0455-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinou, L., Halkia, L., & Skordoulis, C. (2008). What conceptions do Greek school students form about biological evolution? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0051-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector, M. A., Nehm, R. H., & Pearl, D. (2013). Learning the language of evolution: Lexical ambiguity and word meaning in student explanations. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1107–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9296-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2011). How should creationism and intelligent design be dealt with in the classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45, 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. R., & Roy, P. (2007). The natural selection: Identifying and correcting non-science student preconceptions through an inquiry-based, critical approach to evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 69(8), 460–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, R. L., & Burns, S. (2011). Gain in student understanding of the role of random variation in evolution following teaching intervention based on Luria-Delbruck Experiment. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 12(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v12i1.272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, K. L., Brem, S. K., Evans, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (Eds.). (2012). Evolution challenges integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P. M., Taylor, C. E., Hudges, C., Kofod, N., Whitaker, N., Lutze-Mann, Kofod M., & Tzioumis, V. (2010). Threshold concepts in learning biology and evolution. Biology International, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (2000). Evolutionary theory, the Nature of Science & high school biology teachers: critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062%5b0023:ETTNOS%5d2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the standing conference of the ministers of education and cultural affairs of the länder in the Federal Republic of Germany [KMK], 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sensemaking process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of concetpual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0037-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S. A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C. L., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students’ explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or p-prims? Science Education, 85(4), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speth, E. B., Shaw, N., Momsen, J., Reinagel, A., Le, P., Taqieddin, R., & Long, T. (2014). Introductory Biology Students’ Conceptual Models and Explanations of the Origin of Variation. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 13, 529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, L., & Doherty, J. (2009). Assessment of the teaching of evolution by natural selection through a hands-on simulation. In Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology, 6. Retrieved from http://tiee.esa.org/vol/v6/research/spindler/pdf/spindler.pdf.

  • Strevens, M. (2000). The essentialist aspect of naive theories. Cognition, 74(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00071-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibell, L. A. E., & Harms, U. (2017). Biological principles and threshold concepts for understanding natural selection - implications for developing visualizations as a pedagogic tool. Science & Education, 26(7), 953–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9935-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., Hart, J., & Martens, J. P. (2011). Death and science: The existential underpinnings of belief in intelligent design and discomfort with evolution. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e17349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trend, R. D. (2001). Deep Time Framework: A preliminary study of U.K. primary teachers’ conceptions of geologic time and perceptions of geoscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2009). Teaching evolution with historical narratives. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(3), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0127-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2010). Evolution im Unterricht: Eine Studie über fachdidaktisches Wissen von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzel, H., & Gropengießer, H. (2009). Vorstellungsentwicklung zur stammesgeschichtlichen Anpassung: Wie man Lernhindernisse verstehen und förderliche Lernangebote machen kann. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 15, 287–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, T. B., & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: a study of factors contributing to high school biology students’ acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(1), 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Biology Education, Olshausenstr. 62, 24118, Kiel, Germany

    Ute Harms

  2. UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK

    Michael J. Reiss

Authors
  1. Ute Harms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Reiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ute Harms .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education at Kiel University, Kiel, Germany

    Ute Harms

  2. Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK

    Michael J. Reiss

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harms, U., Reiss, M.J. (2019). The Present Status of Evolution Education. In: Harms, U., Reiss, M. (eds) Evolution Education Re-considered. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14697-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14698-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation