Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptual Modeling of Team Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11432))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2025 Accesses

Abstract

Team development is crucial aspect of human resource management. This study is dedicated to the literature review and the conceptual modeling of this domain in the context of the creation of information systems, which takes into consideration concepts defined within plurality of the models and theories of team development. In order to achieve that, authors have proposed a conceptual UML-based Metamodel of Team Development, abstracting the most important concepts of team development whilst providing decent level of models’ formality and unambiguity. Authors have proposed the mapping procedures to Association-Oriented Metamodel, which preserves precise model semantics and is implementable into actual data structures, in order to verify implementability of undertaken research. To exemplify the approach, example of the team development model for the purposes of training groups has been provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See [13] for syntax and semantics description.

References

  1. Belbin, R.M.: Team Roles at Work. Routledge, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennis, W.G., Shepard, H.A.: A theory of group development. Hum. Relat. 9(4), 415–437 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brehm, J.W., Mann, M.: Effect of importance of freedom and attraction to group members on influence produced by group pressure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 31(5), 816–824 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chidambaram, L., Bostrom, R.: Group Decis. Negot. 6(2), 159–187 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fine, G.A.: Tiny Publics: A Theory of Group Action and Culture. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hackman, J.R., Katz, N.: Group behavior and performance. In: Handbook of Social Psychology (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heslin, R., Dunphy, D.: Three dimensions of member satisfaction in small groups. Hum. Relat. 17(2), 99–112 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jodłowiec, M.: Complex relationships modeling in association-oriented database metamodel. In: Nguyen, N.T., Hoang, D.H., Hong, T.-P., Pham, H., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ACIIDS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10752, pp. 46–56. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75420-8_5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaplan, S.R., Roman, M.: Phases of development in an adult therapy group. Int. J. Group Psychother. 13(1), 10–26 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kerr, N.L., Tindale, R.S.: Group performance and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55(1), 623–655 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keyton, J., Stallworth, V.: On the verge of collaboration: identifying group structure and process. In: Group communication in context: studies of bona fide groups, pp. 235–260 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Konieczka, S.: Debating hating: the response and responsibility of a student government. In: Group communication: cases for analysis, appreciation, and application, pp. 167–174 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krótkiewicz, M.: A novel inheritance mechanism for modeling knowledge representation systems. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 51–78 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McGrath, J.E.: Groups: Interaction and Performance, vol. 14. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moreland, R.L.: Are dyads really groups? Small Group Res. 41(2), 251–267 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. OMG: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML). Technical report, Object Management Group, December 2017. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1

  17. Sherif, M.: Experiments in group conflict. Sci. Am. 195(5), 54–59 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Slater, P.: Microcosm: structural, psychological, and religious evolution in groups (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tuckman, B.W., Jensen, M.A.C.: Stages of small-group development revisited. Group Organ. Stud. 2(4), 419–427 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turner, J.C.: Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, pp. 15–40 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zabawa, P., Hnatkowska, B.: CDMM-F – domain languages framework. In: Świątek, J., Borzemski, L., Wilimowska, Z. (eds.) ISAT 2017. AISC, vol. 656, pp. 263–273. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67229-8_24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Marcin Jodłowiec

  2. Faculty of Management, Computer Science and Finance, Wrocław University of Economics, Wrocław, Poland

    Julia Piecuch

Authors
  1. Marcin Jodłowiec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia Piecuch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Jodłowiec .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Ngoc Thanh Nguyen

  2. Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Ford Lumban Gaol

  3. National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Tzung-Pei Hong

  4. Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

    Bogdan Trawiński

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jodłowiec, M., Piecuch, J. (2019). Conceptual Modeling of Team Development. In: Nguyen, N., Gaol, F., Hong, TP., Trawiński, B. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11432. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14802-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14802-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14801-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14802-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation