Abstract
The opposition ‘fury-forgiveness’ might be where we should begin. In his short text on Forgiveness, Jacques Derrida makes a comment on the necessity of forgiving the unforgiveable if forgiveness is to mean anything at all. He writes (Derrida 2001, p. 32), ‘Forgiveness is not, it should not be, normal, normative, normalising. It should remain exceptional and extraordinary, in the face of the impossible: as if it interrupted the ordinary course of historical temporability.’ Forgiveness demands something exceptional if it is to be real. Perhaps this is something that is already widely known – that just saying, for example, ‘I forgive you’ could be no more than an empty phrase (like ‘We come in peace’ in the film Mars Attacks) or worse than that, an aggressive attack in its own right, sanctimoniously derogating the one who has done wrong and ensuring that there is no way they can reclaim the moral high ground, but instead narcissistically grabbing it for oneself. ‘Whatever you have done to me is of no account, because I have the power to forgive.’ But Derrida has something more in mind than this. He thinks that forgiveness only makes sense in relation to something that has been done that cannot be forgiven easily; that is, a struggle has to take place to lift this experience out of the ordinary and into being an encounter that is truly, even religiously, other. This claim, that forgiveness only means something when it is not logical, when it stands outside what Derrida (p. 39) calls ‘the ordinary course of history, politics, and law, ’ is especially to the point when egregious crimes are considered – crimes which in many respects seem, exactly, unforgiveable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abraham, N., & Torok, M. (1994). The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ahmed, S. (2004). Declarations of Whiteness: The Non-performativity of Anti-Racism. Borderlands, 3(2), 1–15.
Ahmed, S. (2010). The Promise of Happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.
Benjamin, J. (2018). Beyond Doer and Done to: Recognition Theory, Intersubjectivity and the Third. London: Routledge.
Bohleber, W. (2007). Remembrance, Trauma and Collective Memory: The Battle for Memory in Psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 329–352.
Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Butler, J. (2012). Parting Ways. New York: Columbia University Press.
Derrida, J. (2001). On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. London: Routledge.
Donoso, G. (2018). Researching Trauma in Relation to Gross Human Rights Violations: A Psychoanalytic and Reflexive Account. Qualitative Research in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1472356.
Erlich, H., Erlich-Ginor, M., & Beland, H. (2009a). Fed with Tears – Poisoned with Milk. Giessen: Psychosozial-Verlag.
Erlich, H. S., Erlich-Ginor, M., & Beland, H. (2009b). Being in Berlin: A Large Group Experience in the Berlin Congress. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90, 809–825.
Figlio, K. (2017). Remembering as Reparation: Psychoanalysis as Historical Memory. London: Palgrave.
Frank, N. (1991). In the Shadow of the Reich. New York: Alfred a Knopf.
Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and Melancholia. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV (1914–1916): On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsychology and Other Works (pp. 237–258). London: Hogarth Press.
Frie, R. (2017). Not in My Family. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frosh, S. (2005). Hate and the Jewish Science. London: Palgrave.
Frosh, S. (2008). Desire, Demand and Psychotherapy: On Large Groups and Neighbours. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 6, 185–197.
Frosh, S. (2012). The Re-enactment of Denial. In A. Gulerce (Ed.), Re(con)figuring Psychoanalysis: Critical Juxtapositions of the Philosophical, the Sociohistorical and the Political. London: Palgrave.
Frosh, S. (2013). Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and Ghostly Transmissions. London: Palgrave.
Gilroy, P. (2004). After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? London: Routledge.
Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2003). A Human Being Died that Night. London: Portobello Books.
Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2016). What Does It Mean to Be Human in the Aftermath of Historical Trauma? Re-envisioning the Sunflower and Why Hannah Arendt Was Wrong. The Nordic Africa Institute and Uppsala University, Uppsala.
Hadar, U. (2013). Psychoanalysis and Social Involvement: Interpretation and Action. London: Palgrave.
Herzog, D. (2017). Cold War Freud: Psychoanalysis in an Age of Catastrophes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffman, E. (2005). After Such Knowledge. London: Vintage.
Mitscherlich, A., & Mitscherlich, M. (1975). Inability to Mourn. New York: Grove Press.
Niven, B. (2013). Reactive Memory: The Holocaust and the Flight and Expulsion of Germans. In M. Silberman & F. Vatan (Eds.), Memory and Postwar Memorials: Confronting the Violence of the Past. London: Palgrave.
Rose, J. (2014). Women in Dark Times. London: Bloomsbury.
Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Sands, P. (2015). My Nazi Legacy. London: British Film Institute/Wildgaze Films.
Schmukalla, M. (2017). Artistic Ruptures and Their ‘Communist’ Ghosts. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Birkbeck, University of London.
Schwab, G. (2010). Haunting Legacies: Violent Histories and Transgenerational Trauma. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sebald, W. G. (2003). On the Natural History of Destruction. London: Penguin.
Steiner, R. (2000). ‘It Is a New Kind of Diaspora’: Explorations in the Sociopolitical and Cultural Context of Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
Stonebridge, L. (1998). The Destructive Element: British Psychoanalysis and Modernism. London: Macmillan.
Vatan, F., & Silberman, M. (2013). Introduction: After the Violence: Memory. In M. Silberman & F. Vatan (Eds.), Memory and Postwar Memorials: Confronting the Violence of the Past. London: Palgrave.
Wilke, G. (2016). The German Social Unconscious: Second Generation Perpetrator Symptoms in Organisations and Groups. In E. Hopper & H. Weinberg (Eds.), The Social Unconscious in Persons, Groups and Societies: Volume 2: Mainly Foundation Matrices. London: Karnac.
Zubrzycki, G. (2013). Narrative Shock and Polish Memory: Remaking in the Twenty-first Century. In M. Silberman & F. Vatan (Eds.), Memory and Postwar Memorials: Confronting the Violence of the Past. London: Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frosh, S. (2019). Acknowledgement and Responsibility. In: Those Who Come After. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14853-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14853-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14852-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14853-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)