Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiple External Representations (MERs) as a Component of Special Language in Biology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education

Part of the book series: Contributions from Science Education Research ((CFSE,volume 6))

  • 810 Accesses

Abstract

Dealing with multiple external representations (MERs) in science education is the key to students’ understanding of science communication and becoming scientifically literate. It is generally accepted that learning scientific concepts, processes, and principles requires understanding and interacting with MERs. Science can be understood as a multimodal discourse, and dealing with MERs becomes a premise for learning and developing representational competence. This study analyzes the use of different representations and the relationship between representational competence and different biological contexts. A competence model with the components integration by information selection and interpretation (MERI), integration by construction (MERII), and translation and transformation of different scientific representations (MERIII) was operationalized in three different biological task contexts (ecology, physiology, genetics) and two types of representation (diagram, schema). Data collection was carried out via test booklets. Participants were 548 first-year university students from various fields. The findings indicate that the components MERI and MERII of the competence model have a significant influence on item difficulty, while there was only a significant influence for the biological task context genetics, but no significant influence for the type of representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainsworth, S. E. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2–3), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, S. E. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, S. E., Bibby, P. A., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 25–62. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, S. E., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C., & Nerdel, C. (2016). Bildverständnis im Biologieunterricht diagnostizieren und fördern. Unterricht Biologie, 417, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholt, S. (2010). Kompetenzmodellierung in der Chemie – Theoretische und empirische Reflexion am Beispiel des Modells hierarchischer Komplexität (Studien zum Physik- und Chemielernen, Bd. 98). Berlin: Logos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2. Auflage). Mahwah [u.a.]: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstetter-Korinth, M. (2017). Abbildungen im Biologieunterricht (Biologie lernen und lehren, Bd. 19). Berlin: Logos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünken, R., Seufert, T., & Zander, S. (2005). Förderung der Kohärenzbildung beim Lernen mit multiplen Repräsentationen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19(1/2), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.19.12.61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion (Psychologie, 3., aktual. und erw. Auflage). München: Pearson Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M. M., & Gilbert, J. K. (2015). Students’ visualization of diagrams representing the human circulatory system: The use of spatial isomorphism and representational conventions. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 136–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.969359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S.-W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Enhancing students’ communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9557-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, D., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2012). Understanding and enhancing the use of multiple external representations in chemistry education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9366-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, D., Elen, J., Schraepen, B., & Clarebout, G. (2014). Understanding possibilities and limitations of abstract chemical representations for achieving conceptual understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.824630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalized cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9(4), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00051-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enzingmüller, C., Nerdel, C., & Prechtl, H. (2012). Lehrerüberzeugungen zur Fachsprache im Biologieunterricht. In M. Gläser-Zikuda, T. Seidel, C. Rohlfs, A. Gröschner, & S. Ziegelbauer (Eds.), Mixed Methods in der empirischen Bildungsforschung (pp. 183–194). Münster [u.a.]: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, N. (2005). Learning physics in context: A study of student learning about electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1187–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florian, C. (2012). Abituraufgaben im Fach Biologie. Schwierigkeitsbestimmende Merkmale schriftlicher Prüfungsaufgaben (Biologie lernen und lehren, Bd. 4). Berlin: Logos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian, C., Schmiemann, P., & Sandmann, A. (2015). Aufgaben im Zentralabitur Biologie – eine kategoriengestützte Analyse charakteristischer Aufgabenmerkmale schriftlicher Abituraufgaben. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 21(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-015-0026-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, A., & Annageldyev, M. (2015). Youden. A program for the construction of booklet designs (Version 1.0) [Computer Software]. Jena: Friedrich Schiller University, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffard, P. B. (2012). Deconstructing and decoding complex process diagrams in university biology. In D. F. Treagust & C.-Y. Tsui (Ed.), Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 165–183). Dordrecht [u.a.]: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettmannsperger, R. (2015). Lernen mit multiplen Repräsentationen aus Experimenten. Ein Beitrag zum Verstehen physikalischer Konzepte. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07436-4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: Pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40, 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9154-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, S. (2015). Repräsentationen im Biologieunterricht – eine qualitative Studie zur Perspektive von Lernenden. Kassel: Universität Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampa, N. N. (2012). Aspekte der Validierung eines Tests zur Kompetenz in Biologie. Eine Studie zur Kompetenz in Biologie und ihren Teildimensionen Konzept- und Prozesswissen. Dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauertz, A. (2008). Schwierigkeitserzeugende Merkmale physikalischer Leistungstestaufgaben (Studien zum Physik- und Chemielernen, Bd. 79). Berlin: Logos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KMK = Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesregierung Deutschland. (2005). Beschlüsse der Kultusministerkonferenz – Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den mittleren Bildungsabschluss (Beschluss vom 16. Dezember 2004). München: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199711)34:9<949::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-U.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualizations in science education (pp. 121–146). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S., & Sutherland, L. M. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328(5977), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmayer, S. (2008). Entwicklung und Überprüfung eines Strukturmodells der Diagrammkompetenz für den Biologieunterricht. Elektronische Dissertation, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany. http://d-nb.info/1019667389/34. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.

  • Leisen, J. (2015). Fachlernen und Sprachlernen! Verband zur Förderung des MINT-Unterrichts, 68(3), 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1998). Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions. Paper presented at the international conference on ideas for a scientific culture, Barcelona, Spain. http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/papers/barcelon.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.

  • Levie, H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 195–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G., Friege, G., & Sandmann, A. (2005). Selbsterklären und Vorwissen. Empirische Pädagogik, 19(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohse, G. L., Biolski, K., Walker, N., & Schmidt, J. D. (1994). A classification of visual representations. Communications of the ACM, 37(12), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/198366.198376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, U., Kleinknecht, M., Metz, K., Schymala, M., & Bohl, T. (2010). Entwicklung und Erprobung eines Kategoriensystems für fächerübergreifende Aufgabenanalyse. In Schulpädagogische Untersuchung Nürnberg, (Forschungsbericht Nr. 38). Erlangen-Nürnberg: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 89, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 43–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (Online Jounal). https://www.ph-freiburg.de/fileadmin/dateien/fakultaet3/sozialwissenschaft/Quasus/Volltexte/2-00mayring-d_qualitativeInhaltsanalyse.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.

  • McElvany, N., Schroeder, S., Richter, T., Hachfeld, A., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., Horz, H., & Ullrich, M. (2010). Texte mit instruktionalen Bildern als Unterrichtsmaterial – Kompetenzen der Lehrkräfte. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 38, 98–116. https://doi.org/10.3262/UW1002098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosbrugger, H. (2012). Item-Response-Theorie (IRT). In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (Eds.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (pp. 227–274). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2000). Analysing discourse in the science classroom. In J. Leach, R. Millar, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 126–142). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muckenfuß, H. (2004). Themen und Kontexte als Strukturelemente des naturwissenschaftlichen Unterrichts – Zu den Schwierigkeiten systematisches Physiklernen zu organisieren. Phy-Did, 2/3, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitz, S., Nerdel, C., & Prechtl, H. (2012). Entwicklung eines Erhebungsinstruments zur Erfassung der Verwendung von Fachsprache im Biologieunterricht. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 18, 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitz, S., Ainsworth, S. E., Nerdel, C., & Prechtl, H. (2014). Do student perceptions of teaching predict the development of representational competence and biological knowledge? Learning and Instruction, 31, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2002). Science without a literacy: A ship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Toward a social practice perspective on the work of reading inscriptions in science texts. Reading Psychology, 31(3), 228–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903256361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rincke, K. (2010). Alltagssprache, Fachsprache und ihre besonderen Bedeutungen für das Lernen. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 235–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelcke, T. (2010). Fachsprachen (3., neu bearb. Auflage, Grundlagen der Germanistik 37). Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnebeck, S., Schöps, K., Prenzel, M., & Hammann, M. (2006). Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen im Ländervergleich. In Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (Ed.), PISA 2006 in Deutschland (pp. 67–92).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (2004). Lehrbuch Testtheorie – Testkonstruktion (Psychologie Lehrbuch, 2., vollständig überarb. und erw. Auflage). Bern [u.a.]: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schecker, H., & Parchmann, I. (2006). Modellierung naturwissenschaftlicher Kompetenz. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaft, 12, 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W. (1994). Wissenserwerb mit logischen Bildern. In B. Weidenmann (Ed.), Wissenserwerb mit Bildern: Instruktionale Bilder in Printmedien, Film/Video und Computerprogrammen (pp. 95–148). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013136727916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (1999). Einflüsse der Visualisierungsform auf die Konstruktion mentaler Modelle beim Text- und Bildverstehen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 46(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3964.46.3.217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., Ullrich, M., Hochpöchler, U., Horz, H., McElvany, N., Schroeder, S., & Baumert, J. (2011). What makes text-picture-integration difficult? A structural and procedural analysis of textbook requirements. Ricerche di Psicologia, 1, 103–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönborn, K. J., & Anderson, T. R. (2009). A model of factors determining students ‘ability to interpret external representations in biochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 193–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701670535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönborn, K. J., & Bögeholz, S. (2009). Knowledge transfer in biology and translation across external representations: Experts’ views and challenges for learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 931–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9153-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Rimmele, R., Dalehefte, I. M., Herweg, C., Kobarg, M., et al. (2006). Blicke auf den Physikunterricht: Ergebnisse der IPN Videostudie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52, 799–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence from formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00022-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stäudel, L., Franke-Braun, G., & Parchmann, I. (2008). Sprache, Kommunikation und Wissenserwerb im Chemieunterricht. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht Chemie, 19(106/107), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. A. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185–233. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2013). Introduction to multiple representations: Their importance in biology and biological education. In D. F. Treagust & E. Tsui (Eds.), Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 3–18). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Vorst, H., Dorschu, A., Fechner, S., Kauertz, A., Krabbe, H., & Sumfleth, E. (2014). Charakterisierung und Strukturierung von Kontexten im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht – Vorschlag einer theoretischen Modellierung. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 21, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-014-0021-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Kotzebue, L., & Nerdel, C. (2012). Professionswissen von Biologielehrkräften zum Umgang mit Diagrammen. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 18, 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Kotzebue, L., & Nerdel, C. (2015). Modellierung und Analyse des Professionswissen zur Diagrammkompetenz bei angehenden Biologielehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-015-0639-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wafi, S., & Wirtz, M. A. (2016). Visualisierungskompetenz in didaktischen Kontexten. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11134-2_3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmann, B. (1994). Wissenserwerb mit Bildern. Instruktionale Bilder in Printmedien, Film/Video und Computerprogrammen (1. Auflage). Bern [u.a.]: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H.-K., Kuo, C.-Y., Jen, T.-H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2015). What makes an item more difficult? Effects of modality and type of visual information in a computer-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities. Computers & Education, 85, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziepprecht, K. (2016). Strategien und Kompetenzen von Lernenden beim Erschließen von biologischen Informationen aus unterschiedlichen Repräsentationen (Biologie lernen und lehren, Bd. 15). Berlin: Logos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Christina Beck & Claudia Nerdel

Authors
  1. Christina Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia Nerdel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Beck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. CASTeL, School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    Eilish McLoughlin

  2. CASTeL, School of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    Odilla E. Finlayson

  3. Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Sibel Erduran

  4. EPI-STEM, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Peter E. Childs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beck, C., Nerdel, C. (2019). Multiple External Representations (MERs) as a Component of Special Language in Biology. In: McLoughlin, E., Finlayson, O.E., Erduran, S., Childs, P.E. (eds) Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17218-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17219-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation