Skip to main content
  • 793 Accesses

Abstract

The future success of the mining industry is dependent on its ability to gain the trust of a wide range of stakeholders in order to obtain its social license to develop and operate (Social License to Operate (SLO)) mines while remaining competitive, profitable and fostering Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Our discussion of twenty-first-century tailings dams management starts with a dispassionate look at four major recent failures, revealing the gaps that will make it possible to develop twenty-first-century tailings dams management programs that are sustainable, reasonable, rational and add value to mining project and the industry as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aven T (2012) The risk concept - historical and recent development trends. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 99: 33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • [BC AG 2016] Auditor General of British Columbia (2016) An Audit of Compliance and Enforcement of the Mining Sector http://www.bcauditor.com/pubs/2016/audit-compliance-and-enforcement-mining-sector

  • Brehaut H (2017) Catastrophic dam failures path forward, Keynote lecture, Tailings and Mine Waste 2017, Banff, Nov 5–9, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell J (2011) Slimes dam - aka tailings storage facility - failure and what it meant to my mining mindset, cited in Chambers & Higman (2011), p. 18, n. 24

    Google Scholar 

  • [CDA 2014] Canadian Dam Association (2014) Technical Bulletin, Application of dam safety guidelines to mining dams

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman C, Ward S (2011) The Probability-impact grid - a tool that needs scrapping, in: How to manage Project Opportunity and Risk, 3rd ed., ch. 2, pp 49–51, Chichester, GB, John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, LA Jr (2008) What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices? Risk Analysis 28(2): 497–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox LA Jr, Babayev D, Huber W (2005) Some limitations of qualitative risk rating systems, Risk Analysis 25(3): 651–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell S (nd) Qualitative Risk & Probability Impact Graphs: Time For A Rethink? http://www.intorisk.co.uk/resources/white-papers/qualitative-risk-assessmens

  • Haimes YY (2009) On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems-Based Approach. Risk Analysis 29: 1647–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G, Prahalad CK (2005) Strategic Intent, Harvard Business Review, Jul-Aug 2005, https://hbr.org/2005/07/strategic-intent

  • Hubbard D (2009) Worse than Useless. The most popular risk assessment method and Why it doesn’t work, in: The Failure of Risk Management. Ch. 7, pp. 117–144, Hoboken, Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1(1):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance W (1976) Of Acceptable Risk - Science and the Science and the Determination of Safety, Technical report, Los Altos, CA, William Kaufmann Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • [MAC OMS Guide 2019] Mining Association of Canada (2019) Developing an Operation, Maintenance, and Surveillance Manual for Tailings and Water Management Facilities SECOND EDITION, Feb. 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern NR (2010) Improving the safety of mine waste impoundments. In: Tailings and Mine Waste ’10, Vail, CO. October 17–20, 2010, Boca Raton: CRC Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern NR (2018) Geotechnical Risk, Regulation, And Public Policy, The Sixth Victor de Mello Lecture, 2018, SOILS and ROCKS An International Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering I, 41(2): 107–129

    Google Scholar 

  • [NRC US 2009] National Research Council (US) Committee on Improving Risk Analysis Approaches Used by the U.S. Science and Decisions. Advancing Risk Assessment, EPA, Washington (DC), National Academies Press (US) (http://www.nap.edu/)

  • Oboni C, Oboni F (2012) Is it true that PIGs Fly when Evaluating Risks of Tailings Management Systems? Mining 2012, Keystone CO

    Google Scholar 

  • [Oboni et al. 2013] Oboni F, Oboni C, Zabolotniuk S (2013) Can We Stop Misrepresenting Reality to the Public?, CIM 2013, Toronto. https://www.riskope.com/wp-content/uploads/Can-We-Stop-Misrepresenting-Reality-to-the-Public.pdf

  • Roche, C., Thygesen, K., Baker, E. (eds). (2017). Mine Tailings Storage: Safety Is No Accident. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme and GRID-Arendal, Nairobi and Arendal, ISBN: 978-82-7701-170-7 http://www.grida.no/publications/383

  • Thomas P, Bratvold RB, Bickel JE (2014) The Risk of Using Risk Matrices, SPE, Economics & Management 6(2): 56–66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franco Oboni .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oboni, F., Oboni, C. (2020). Introduction. In: Tailings Dam Management for the Twenty-First Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19447-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics