Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development ((DTSD,volume 11))

  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter covers the Indian case study. Skewed sex ratios disfavoring girls date back to colonial times where they were largely driven by infanticide, differences in nutrition and health, and postnatal neglect. Yet, since the introduction of ultrasound in the 1980s, prenatal sex selection has been on the rise. India has introduced a variety of policies to address sex selection including advocacy and conditional transfers. Yet, its approach has primarily focused on a strong legal ban, the PC-PNDT Act, on sex determination seeking to punish doctors who provide sex-selective services. There is little conclusive evidence that such a “methods-based” approach has had a significant effect on SRB. In order assess policy efficacy, I examine the district of Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar (formerly Nawanshahr) in the state of Punjab. The district became known for a rigorous government action against sex selection carried out in the mid 2000s. While there has been an overall improvement in SRB in the post-intervention period in all of Punjab, significant changes have been made in SBS Nagar, which can be directly linked to the intervention. Thanks to strong leadership and community mobilization policy efficacy was significantly improved. However, improvements came with the negative unintended side effect of infringing human rights and gender equality, which I discuss under “political masculinities.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    First records of the emergence of socio-economic classes, kinship, caste system go back to the sixth Century BCE (Singh, 2008) and coincided with the rise of cities and kings in North India. The social and political changes at the time had important implications for gender, family and household relations. “Strict control over women’s sexuality and reproductive potential was essential for the patrilineal transmission of property and for the maintenance and perpetuation of the endogamous caste structure” (Singh, 2008, p. 295).

  2. 2.

    Diverse leaders had aspired India’s political unification during their various regimes, including the Buddhist Ashoka, the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, the British Wellesley, and most recently modern India’s first prime minster Nehru. Meanwhile, diverse regional forces like the ancient rulers of Kalinga (modern Odisha), the Rajputs, the Marathas, the Sikhs, or contemporary leaders of Kashmir, Punjab, and Assam have all struggled against central control and for autonomy (Walsh, 2006).

  3. 3.

    Linguistic unification was achieved by making English the official language of education (Ellis, 2009).

  4. 4.

    According to the 2017 Forbes ranking, India is the fourth country with the richest people worldwide (Dolan, 2017). India’s billionaires accumulate a net worth of over US$ 320 billion equivalent to approximately 13% of India’s GDP in 2017.

  5. 5.

    In this regard there is some fluidity in the caste system.

  6. 6.

    Stephen papers “Letter to Minnie” dated 19.12.1869 as cited in Hutchins (2015, p. 50).

  7. 7.

    Margaret Sanger herself visited India in 1935 to promote birth control. She was also involved in establishing the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) in Bombay in 1952.

  8. 8.

    Around same time at the other end of the spectrum, sex-selective services became available in urban public hospitals and were increasingly being requested by the Indian elite to avoid unwanted female births (Hvistendahl, 2011).

  9. 9.

    This shift in the global agenda shows that policy feedback and learning from past policy experiences also applies in international governance.

  10. 10.

    A further important objective of the National Population Policy was to achieve 100% registration of births, deaths, marriage and pregnancy.

  11. 11.

    This was before the 2003 amendment of the PC&PNDT Act prohibiting preconception sex selection.

  12. 12.

    India Census Reports for respective years (see Census India, 2011).

  13. 13.

    Consider female literacy rate in India as an example. In 1951, only 8.9% of Indian women were literate vs. 65.5% in 2011. While in Kerala 92% of women are literate, Rajasthan has with 52.6% the lowest female literacy rate in the country according to the 2011 Census.

  14. 14.

    E.g. the laws on dowry and rape were tightened after national protests (Alfano, 2017).

  15. 15.

    Silent observer or active tracker is an electronic device that connects to ultrasound machines. It allows authorities to monitor and record the scans taken by doctors in order to reveal any misuse.

  16. 16.

    The PNDT Act was introduced in 1994 and came into effect in 1996.

  17. 17.

    I had the opportunity to meet the actress who played the daughter that escaped sex selection in the TV series during field research. When I met the young woman she was studying for her final exams and getting ready to go to college in the Unites States. She forms part of a remarkable family, in which three generations (grandfather, mother and daughter) have dedicated and continue to dedicate large portions of their lives for political activism against sex selection (through media, NGO, academic and political engagements).

  18. 18.

    This person by mistake happened to be a Pakistani military officer instead of an Indian officer.

  19. 19.

    Personal conversation with Guilmoto, 14.11.2016.

References

  • Alfano, M. (2017). Daughters, dowries, deliveries: The effect of marital payments on fertility choices in India. Journal of Development Economics, 125, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, F., Kishor, S., & Roy, T. K. (2002). Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 759–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attané, I., & Guilmoto, C. Z. (Eds.). (2007). Watering the neighbour’s garden. The growing demographic female deficit in Asia. Paris, France: CICRED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attané, I., & Véron, J. (2005). Gender discriminations among young children in Asia/edited by Isabelle Attané & Jacques Véron. Pondicherry, India: French Institute of Pondicherry: Centre Population et Développement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bapna, N. (2017). Protecting the PCPNDT Act. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(7), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, R. D., Dube, R., & Dube, R. (2005). Female infanticide in India: A feminist cultural history. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, N. (2017). Political economy, gender and the girl child in India. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEHAT. (2003). Sex selection issues and concerns. A compilation of writings. Mumbai, India: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Census India. (2011). Census of India Website: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Retrieved August 16, 2015, from http://censusindia.gov.in/

  • Chamarbagwala, R., & Ranger, M. (2006a). India’s missing women: Disentangling cultural, political and economic variables (CAEPR Working Paper, 1–33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamarbagwala, R., & Ranger, M. (2006b). Son preference, voting behavior, and India’s missing women (CAEPR Working Paper, 1–33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J., Bernstein, S., Ezeh, A., Faundes, A., Glasier, A., & Innis, J. (2006). Family planning: The unfinished agenda. The Lancet, 368(9549), 1810–1827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, M. J. (2008). Fatal misconception: The struggle to control world population. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSO. (2017). Youth in India 2017. New Delhi, India: Central Statistics Office (Social Statistics Division).

    Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, M. (2009). Family systems, political systems, and Asia’s ‘missing girls’ : The construction of son preference and its unraveling (No. WPS5148). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta, M., & Mari Bhat, P. N. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies, 51(3), 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFI. (2010, January 24). Ex-Pak air force chief’s image in Indian govt advertisement. Retrieved March 27, 2018, from http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/ex-pak-air-force-chiefs-image-in-indian-govt-advertisement.8182/

  • Dolan, K. A. (2017, March 20). Forbes 2017 billionaires list. Retrieved June 3, 2017, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2017/03/20/forbes-2017-billionaires-list-meet-the-richest-people-on-the-planet/

  • Eklund, L., & Purewal, N. (2017). The bio-politics of population control and sex-selective abortion in China and India. Feminism & Psychology, 27(1), 34–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2009). Education for all: Reassessing the historiography of education in colonial India. History Compass, 7(2), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, S. M. (2016, February 15). Sex determination: Answer this. The Indian Express. Retrieved June 9, 2017, from http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/sex-determination-answer-this/

  • Guha, R. (2008). India after Gandhi: The history of the world’s largest democracy (1st Harper Perennial ed.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmoto, C. Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Development Review, 35(3), 519–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Z., Das Gupta, M., & Li, S. (2016). ‘Missing girls’ in China and India: Trends and policy challenges. Asian Population Studies, 12(2), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J. A. (2000). New reproductive technologies, women’s health and autonomy: Freedom or dependency. New Delhi, India: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwatkin, D. R. (1979). Political will and family planning: The implications of India’s emergency experience. Population and Development Review, 5(1), 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkavy, O., & Roy, K. (2007). Emergence of the Indian national family planning program. In W. C. Robinson & J. A. Ross (Eds.), The global family planning revolution: Three decades of population policies and programs (pp. 301–323). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haub, C., & Sharma, O. P. (2006). India’s population reality: Reconciling change and tradition. Population Reference Bureau, 61(3), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirve, S. S. (2004). Abortion law, policy and services in India: A critical review. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. (2009). Abortion, family planning, and population policy: Prospects for the common-ground approach. Population and Development Review, 35(3), 479–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, F. G. (2015). The illusion of permanence: British imperialism in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvistendahl, M. (2011). Unnatural selection: Choosing boys over girls, and the consequences of a world full of men. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, S. J., Acharya, R., Basu, S., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2015). Addressing gender-biased sex selection in Haryana, India: Promising approaches (p. 132). New Delhi, India: Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, M. E. (2014). Sex ratios and sex selection in India: History and the present. In L. Fernandes (Ed.), Routledge handbook of gender in South Asia (pp. 291–304). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, M. E. (2015). Adverse child sex ratio: Is it all about mindsets? Girls Count Newsletter, 3(6), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. (2007). Reflections on the campaign against sex selection and exploring ways forward (p. 260). Pune, India: Centre for Youth Development and Activities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. M. (2000). Gentle nudges vs. hard shoves: Solving the sticky norms problem. The University of Chicago Law Review, 67(3), 607–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantry, S. (2017, July 27). How to fix India’s sex-selection problem. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaser, K. (2008). Patriarchy after patriarchy. Gender relations in Turkey and in the Balkans 1500–2000. Vienna, Austria: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kervyn de Lettenhove, M. (2012). Conditional cash transfers in Latin America: Impact, scope and limitations. Reflets et Perspectives de La Vie Économique, 2, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, D., & Tipandjan, A. (2014). Son preference in India: Shedding light on the north-south gradient. Comparative Population Studies, 40(1), 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, P. (2009). Tracking India’s sex ratio at birth: Evidence of a turnaround. In K. James, A. Pandey, D. Bansod, & L. Subaiya (Eds.), Population, gender and health in India: Methods, processes and policies (pp. 191–210). New Delhi, India: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, M., & Kaur, R. (2013). Sex ratio imbalance and shifting social practices in northern India signs of change? Economic and Political Weekly, (35), 48, 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpani, A., Malpani, A., & Modi, D. (2002). The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in sex selection for family balancing in India. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 4(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. D. (1985). Prenatal and postnatal sex-selection in India: The patriarchal context, ethical questions and public policy. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. D. (1987). Female infanticide and child neglect in rural North India. In N. Scheper-Hughes (Ed.), Child survival (pp. 95–112). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MoWCD. (2014, December 2). Beti Bachao Beti Padhao Guidelines for District Collectors/Deputy Commissioners. Ministry of Women & Child Development Government of India. Retrieved December 6, 2016, from http://www.wcd.nic.in/BBBPScheme/02.12.2014%20Final-Guidelines_BBBP.pdf%20(1).pdf

  • MoWCD. (2016, October 2). Gandhi Jayanti, Beti Bachao Beti Padhao. Retrieved March 6, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwQi9j6S2Zo

  • Myrdal, G. (1970). The challenge of world poverty: A world anti-poverty program in outline. London, UK: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, J. (1996). Women and law in colonial India: A social history. New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, P., Datta, N., & Das, P. (2014). Impact of conditional cash transfers on girls’ education (p. 8). New Delhi, India: International Center for Research on Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandi, A., & Deolalikar, A. B. (2013). Does a legal ban on sex-selective abortions improve child sex ratios? Evidence from a policy change in India. Journal of Development Economics, 103, 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, F. (2008). Images and icons: Harnessing the power of mass media to promote gender equality and reduce practices of sex selection (p. 70). New Delhi, India: BBC World Service Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, T. (Ed.). (2007). Sex-selective abortion in India: Gender, society and new reproductive technologies. New Delhi, India: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phanjoubam, M. (2017). Proposed amendments in the medical termination of pregnancy act in a nutshell. Journal of Medical Society, 31(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission. (2012). Planning commission government of India five year plans, 1st–12th. Retrieved August 7, 2017, from http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/welcome.html

  • Purewal, N. K. (2010). Son preference: Sex selection, gender and culture in South Asia (English ed.). Oxford, UK: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, L. (2018). Protect, track, emancipate. The role of political masculinities in India’s fight against sex selection. Men and Masculinities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18768873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S. I., Srinivasan, S., & Bedi, A. S. (2015). Coming back to normal? Census 2011 and sex ratios in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(52), 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S. I., Srinivasan, S., & Bedi, A. S. (2017). Update on trends in sex ratio at birth in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(11), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, K., & Deshpande, V. (1964). The sex ratio at birth in India by regions. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 42, 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanamma, A., & Bambawale, U. (1980). The mania for sons: An analysis of social values in South Asia. Social Science and Medicine, 14(2), 107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V., & Janning, F. (2006). Politikfeldanalyse. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekher, T. V. (2012). Special financial incentive schemes for the girl child in India: A review of select schemes (p. 134). New Delhi, India: UNFPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2003). Missing women: Revisited. BMJ, 327(7427), 1297–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seth, S. (2010). Skewed sex ratio at birth in India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 42(01), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, K. (2011). Changing the terms of the discourse: Gender, equality and the Indian state. New Delhi, India: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K. (2013). Laws and son preference in India. A reality check (p. 174). New Delhi, India: UNFPA India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., & Singh, N. (2017). Confronting gender discrimination in Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly, (8), 52, 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, U. (2008). A history of ancient and early medieval India. New Delhi, India: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, M., & Gasper, D. (2010). How can power discourses be changed? Contrasting the ? Daughter deficit? Policy of the Delhi government with Gandhi and King’s transformational reframing. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 290–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, N., & Yoong, J. (2009). Long-term financial incentives and investment in daughters: Evidence from conditional cash transfers In North India (Policy Research Working Papers). New York, NY: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solotaroff, J. L., & Pande, R. P. (2014). Violence against women and girls : Lessons from South Asia. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1994). Can the subaltern speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 66–111). Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, S., & Bedi, A. S. (2011). Ensuring daughter survival in Tamil Nadu, India. Oxford Development Studies, 39(3), 253–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A. L., Allchin, F. R., Schwartzberg, J. E., Dikshit, K. R., Alam, M., & Calkins, P. B. (2017). India. Retrieved June 4, 2017, from https://www.britannica.com/place/India

  • Stephen, J. F. (1991). Liberty, equality, fraternity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, S. V., & Selvaraj, S. (2009). Social analysis of sex imbalance in India: Before and after the implementation of the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PNDT) Act. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 63(3), 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, D. K., Garg, S., & Garg, I. (2015). Public health in India: Technology, governance and service delivery. New Delhi, India: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Hindu. (2017, June 10). Prez-selfie-with-daughter. The Hindu. Retrieved July 18, 2017, from http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-in-school/prez-selfie-with-daughter/article18952636.ece

  • UNDESA. (2015). World population prospects: The 2015 revision (No. ESA/P/WP.241). Retrieved July 29, 2015, from http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdf

  • UNFPA. (2007). Addressing gender-biased violence in East and South-East Asia. Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved February 26, 2018, from http://asiapacific.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Addressing%20GBV%20in%20E%20and%20SE%20Asia%20%282007%29.pdf

  • UNFPA, & Breakthrough. (2014). Communication guide: A key to building a people’s response to gender-biased sex selection (p. 112). New Delhi, India: UNFPA India.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA Evaluation Office. (2017). Evaluation of UNFPA support to the prevention, response to and elimination of gender-based violence and harmful practices, 2012–2017. India case study (p. 55). New Delhi, India: UNFPA India.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA India. (2014). Missing: Mapping the adverse child sex ratio in India census 2011. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner & UNFPA India. Retrieved December 6, 2016, from http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/missing.pdf

  • UNICEF, & UNFPA. (2014). Synthesis of research on gender biased sex selection – insights and learnings (2001–2012) (p. 52). New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, I. C., Joseph, R., Verma, K., Buckshee, K., & Ghai, O. P. (1975). Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders. Indian Pediatrics, 12(5), 381–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visaria, L., & Ved, R. R. (2016). India’s family planning programme: Policies, practices and challenges. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath, L. S. (1998). Efforts of colonial state to suppress female infanticide: Use of sacred texts, generation of knowledge. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(19), 1104–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath, L. S. (2007). Female infanticide, property and the colonial state. In T. Patel (Ed.), Sex-selective abortion in India: Gender, society and new reproductive technologies (pp. 269–285). New Delhi, India: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. E. (2006). A brief history of India. New York, NY: Infobase Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattal, P. K. (1916). The population problem in India: A census study. Bombay, India: Bennett, Coleman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (Ed.). (2012). Safe abortion: Technical and policy guidance for health systems (2nd ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016). India. Data on poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) and on improved sanitation facilities. Retrieved November 28, 2016, from http://data.worldbank.org/country/india

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rahm, L. (2020). India. In: Gender-Biased Sex Selection in South Korea, India and Vietnam. Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20234-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20234-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20233-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20234-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics