Skip to main content

Method of Decision-Making Logic Discovery in the Business Process Textual Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems (BIS 2019)

Abstract

Growing amount of complexity and enterprise data creates a need for novel business process (BP) analysis methods to assess the process optimization opportunities. This paper proposes a method of BP analysis while extracting the knowledge about Decision-Making Logic (DML) in a form of taxonomy. In this taxonomy, researchers consider the routine, semi-cognitive and cognitive DML levels as functions of BP conceptual aspects of Resources, Techniques, Capacities, and Choices. Preliminary testing and evaluation of developed method using data set of entry ticket texts from the IT Helpdesk domain showed promising results in the identification and classification of the BP Decision-Making Logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    IT Infrastructure Library Framework, www.axelos.com/best-practice-solutions/itil.

  2. 2.

    The relative distributions were calculated based on the presence of the DML taxonomy vocabulary key words in a ticket and not on the overall count of words in a ticket.

References

  1. Bourgouin, A., Leshob, A., Renard, L.: Towards a process analysis approach to adopt robotic process automation. In: 15th International Conference on e-Business Engineering, Xi’an, pp. 46–53. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lowes, P., Cannata, F.R.S., Chitre, S., Barkham, J.: The Business Leader’s Guide to Robotic and Intelligent Automation. Automate This (2016). Deloitte: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/operations/deloitte-nl-operations-the-business-leaders-guide-to-robotic-and-intelligent-automation-automate-this-report.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2019

  3. Koorn, J.J., Leopold, H., Reijers, H.A.: A task framework for predicting the effects of automation. In: Twenty-Sixth European Conference on Information Systems Proceedings, Portsmouth (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Autor, D.H., Levy, F., Murnane, R.J.: The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q. J. Econ. 118, 1279–1333 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy, F., Murnane, R.: With what skills are computers a complement? Am. Econ. Rev. 86(2), 258–262 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jetschni, J., Meister, V.G.: Schema engineering for enterprise knowledge graphs - a reflecting survey and case study. In: Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems Proceedings, Cairo, pp. 271–277. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. RDF Scheme. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/. Accessed 1 Jan 2019

  8. Khairova, N.F., Petrasova, S., Gautam, A.P.S.: The logical-linguistic model of fact extraction from English texts. In: Dregvaite, G., Damasevicius, R. (eds.) ICIST 2016. CCIS, vol. 639, pp. 625–635. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46254-7_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Leopold, H., van der Aa, H., Reijers, H.A.: Identifying candidate tasks for robotic process automation in textual process descriptions. In: Gulden, J., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R., Guerreiro, S., Guédria, W., Bera, P. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2018. LNBIP, vol. 318, pp. 67–81. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91704-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: Automatic derivation of service candidates from business process model repositories. In: Abramowicz, W., Kriksciuniene, D., Sakalauskas, V. (eds.) BIS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 117, pp. 84–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30359-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Leopold, H., van der Aa, H., Pittke, F., Raffel, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Searching textual and model-based process descriptions based on a unified data format. Softw. Syst. Model. 18(2), 1179–1194 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blei, D.M.: Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 55(4), 77–84 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K.: Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Proceedings, pp. 281–285. ACM, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xinghua, L., Zhixin, M.: Research on the problem of the intuitive decision making. In: The 2nd International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-Technology Proceedings, Beijing, pp. 192–196. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rizun, N., Shmelova, T.: Decision-making models of the human-operator as an element of the socio-technical systems. In: Batko, R., Szopa, A. (eds.) Strategic Imperatives and Core Competencies in the Era of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 167–204. IGI Global, Hershey (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rizun, N., Taranenko, Y.: Simulation models of human decision-making processes. Manage. Dyn. Knowl. Econ. 2(5), 241–264 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Maio, C., Fenza, G., Loia, V., Orciuoli, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A framework for context-aware heterogeneous group decision-making in business processes. Knowl.-Based Syst. 102, 39–50 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pérez-Álvareza, J.M., Maté, A., Gómez-López, M.T., Trujillo, J.: Tactical business-process-decision support based on KPIs monitoring and validation. Comput. Ind. 102, 23–39 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chibelushi, C., Thelwall, M.: Text mining for meeting transcript analysis to extract key decision elements. In: International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists Proceedings, IMECS, Hong Kong (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. van der Aalst, W.: Process Mining. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.: Decision mining in ProM. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 420–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11841760_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Guttmann, C.: Towards a taxonomy of decision making problems in multi-agent systems. In: Braubach, L., van der Hoek, W., Petta, P., Pokahr, A. (eds.) MATES 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5774, pp. 195–201. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04143-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Scherpereel, C.M.: Decision orders: a decision taxonomy. Manag. Decis. 44(1), 123–136 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gibcus, P., Vermeulen, P.A., de Jong, J.P.: Strategic decision making in small firms: a taxonomy of small business owners. Entrepreneurship Small Bus. 7(1), 74–91 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 78(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Patton, M.Q.: Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv. Res. 34(5), 1189–1208 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spitz-Oener, A.: Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: looking outside the wage structure. J. Labor Econ. 24(2), 235–270 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rizun, N., Taranenko, Y., Waloszek, W.: The algorithm of modelling and analysis of latent semantic relations: linear algebra vs. probabilistic topic models. In: Różewski, P., Lange, C. (eds.) KESW 2017. CCIS, vol. 786, pp. 53–68. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69548-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Rizun, N., Taranenko, Y., Waloszek, W.: Improving the accuracy in sentiment classification in the light of modelling the latent semantic relations. Information 9(12), 53–68 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. OMG: Decision Model and Notation (DMN) – Version 1.1. Object Management Group, Needham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) – Version 2.0.2. Object Management Group, Needham (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. OMG: Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) – Version 1.1. Object Management Group, Needham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandra Revina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rizun, N., Revina, A., Meister, V. (2019). Method of Decision-Making Logic Discovery in the Business Process Textual Data. In: Abramowicz, W., Corchuelo, R. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 353. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20485-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20485-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20484-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20485-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics