Abstract
Contemporary institutions of international cooperation are very diverse, a particular example of which are international courts and tribunals. The past few decades have seen a very dynamic development of such institutions of international cooperation. Not only do they take an active part in settling regular international disputes between states, but also play a role in implementing state obligations arising under their membership in international organisations. With respect to the latter role, judicial bodies act as not only international courts, but they also perform the functions of constitutional courts, administrative courts and labour tribunals. Moreover, the jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals is being extended onto the process of implementing the international law of human rights and international humanitarian law. From the point of view of international law, the legal status, structure and competence of contemporary international courts and tribunals are very diverse. This is due to the nature and content of their constituent instruments. The determining criterium of classifying a court as international is its formation by an international treaty, usually a multilateral one. Permanent courts formed by such treaties usually operate within the institutional framework of international organizations (ICJ, CJEU, ECHR) and do not have their own international legal personalities. However, it may happen that a permanent judicial body formed by an international treaty operates outside the framework of an international organisation and has its own international legal personality (ICC). This is different compared to the formation of ad hoc judicial bodies. Their legal basis can be both international treaties, including bilateral treaties (e.g. RSCSL-SCSL), and UN Security Council resolutions (e.g. ICTY, ICTR, IRMCT). Some of the international criminal tribunals are the so-called hybrid tribunals. They are specific in nature and are referred to as internationalized tribunals. Their status is clearly different than that of other tribunals, as is the legal basis for their formation and the degree of their internationalisation. Due to the above-mentioned issues, the legal status of international courts is diversified. They need to be analysed against the backdrop of the underlying issue of subjectivity of international law, and also with reference to the law of treaties and the law of the international organisations.
Dr. iur. Aleksander Gadkowski, Lawyer at the Research and Analyses Office of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland and Postdoctoral Researcher at the Faculty of Law and Administration at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland. Former Lawyer at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights (2016–2018). Author of articles on human rights law and European social law.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Caminos (2013), pp. 55 et seq.
- 2.
- 3.
Szpak (2014), pp. 31 et seq.
- 4.
See e.g. Abi-Saab (1999), p. 921.
- 5.
Dupuy (2007), p. 2.
- 6.
Sands (1999), p. XXVI.
- 7.
Amerasinghe (2005), pp. 12 et seq.
- 8.
Klabbers (2002), p. 10.
- 9.
Gehring (1991), p. 35.
- 10.
See Schmalenbach (2012), p. 872.
- 11.
See, e.g., Gadkowski (2018), p. 48.
- 12.
Text of the Rome Statute: UNTS, vol. 2187, p. 90; see: Lee (2002).
- 13.
Romano et al. (2004).
- 14.
Text of the Convention: UNTS, vol. 575, p. 159.
- 15.
Schreuer (2001), pp. 67 et seq.
- 16.
Buergenthal (2001), p. 267 et seq.
- 17.
Tomuschat (2001), p. 1108.
- 18.
Rosenne (2007), pp. XI et seq.
- 19.
D’Aspremont and Besson (2017).
- 20.
Schermers and Blokker (2011), p. 40.
- 21.
The text of the Statute: UNTS, vol. 33, p. 993.
- 22.
See: Certain Expenses of the United Nations (Article 17, paragraph 2 of the Charter), Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1962, p. 157.
- 23.
Text of the Convention: ETS 005.
- 24.
Text of the Rome Statute: UNTS, vol. 2187, p. 90.
- 25.
Text of the Convention: UNTS, vol. 1883, p. 3.
- 26.
UN Doc. SC/RES/8087 (1993); for commentary see: Pickard (1995), pp. 435 et seq.
- 27.
UN Doc. SC/RES/955 (1994); for commentary see: van den Herik (2005), pp. 27 et seq.
- 28.
On December 22, 2010, the Security Council adopted resolution SC/RES/1966, which created a special Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals which “shall continue the jurisdiction, rights and obligations and essential functions of the ICTY and the ICTR”; for commentary see: Mbengue (2015), p. 201.
- 29.
Cançado Trinidade (2014), p. 1 et seq.
- 30.
Kent et al. (2019).
References
Abi-Saab, G. (1999). Fragmentation or unification: Some concluding remarks. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 31(4), 919–933.
Amerasinghe, C. F. (2005). Principles of the institutional law of international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buergenthal, T. (2001). Proliferation of international courts and tribunals: Is it good or bad? Leiden Journal of International Law, 14(2), 267–275.
Cała-Wacinkiewicz, E. (2018). Fragmentacja prawa międzynarodowego. Warsaw: C.H. Beck.
Caminos, H. (2013). The growth of specialized international tribunals and the fears of fragmentation of international law. In N. Boschiero, T. Scovazzi, C. Pitea, & C. Ragni (Eds.), International courts and the development of international law. Essays in Honor of Tullio Treves (pp. 55–65). The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
Cançado Trinidade, A. A. (2014). Reflections on a century of international justice and prospects for the future. In G. Gaja & J. Grote Stoutenburg (Eds.), Enhancing the rule of law through the international court of justice (pp. 1–32). Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff.
Czapliński, W. (2007). Multiplikacja sądów międzynarodowych – szanse czy zagrożenia dla jedności prawa międzynarodowego. In J. Kolasa & A. Kozłowski (Eds.), Rozwój prawa międzynarodowego – jedność czy fragmentacja (pp. 77–130). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
D’Aspremont, J., & Besson, S. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook on the sources of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dupuy, P. M. (2007). A Doctrinal debate in the globalisation Era: On the “Fragmentation” of international law. European Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 1–19.
Gadkowski, A. (2018). Treaty-making powers of international organizations. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Gehring, T. (1991). International environmental regimes: Dynamic sectoral legal systems. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1(1), 35–56.
Kent, A., Nikos Skoutaris, N., & Trinidad, J. (Eds.). (2019). The future of international courts. Regional, institutional and procedural challenges. New York: Routledge.
Klabbers, J. (2002). An introduction to international institutional law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, R. S. (2002). The international criminal court. The making of the Roma Statute – Issues – Negotiations – Results. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Mbengue, M. M. (2015). Challenges of judges in international criminal courts and tribunals. In C. Giorgetti (Ed.), Challenges and recusals of judges and arbitrators in international courts and tribunals (pp. 183–227). Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff.
Pickard, D. B. (1995). Security council resolution 808: A step toward a permanent international court for the prosecution of international crimes and human rights violations. Golden Gate University Law Review, 25, 435–462.
Romano, C. P. R., Nollkaemper, A., & Kleffner, J. K. (Eds.). (2004). Internationalized criminal courts: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenne, S. (2007). Interpretation, revision and other recourse from international judgments and awards. Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff.
Sands, P. (1999). Introduction. In P. Sands, R. Mackenzie, & Y. Shany (Eds.), Manual of international courts and tribunals (pp. ix–xxiii). London: Lexis.
Schermers, H. G., & Blokker, N. M. (2011). International institutional law. Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff.
Schmalenbach, K. (2012). International organizations or institutions, supervision and sanctions. In R. Wolfrum (Ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of public international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schreuer, C. H. (2001). The ICSID convention. A commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szpak, A. (2014). Proliferation of international courts and tribunals and its impact on the fragmentation of international law. The International Law Annual, 2, 31–39.
Tomuschat, C. (2001). International courts and tribunals. In R. Bernhard (Ed.), Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van den Herik, L. J. (2005). The contribution of the Rwanda tribunal to the development of international law. Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gadkowski, A. (2019). Legal Basis for the Establishment of International Courts. In: Pinto de Albuquerque, P., Wojtyczek, K. (eds) Judicial Power in a Globalized World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20744-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20744-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20743-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20744-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)