Skip to main content

Learning Effects of Different Digital-Based Approaches in Chemistry: A Quasi-experimental Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education (TECH-EDU 2018)

Abstract

This study aimed at assessing the learning effects of different ways of integrating digital educational resources in chemistry education. The alternative hypothesis is that digital educational resources contribute more effectively for students’ learning than pen-and-paper consolidation worksheets. A sample of 61 students participated in a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design with four conditions (control, and three digital-based approaches: outside the classroom individual approach, inside the classroom individual approach, inside the classroom group approach). Three digital educational resources were developed to address three chemistry themes (particle motion, gas pressure, and electric current through a solution). Results revealed that the inside the classroom individual digital-based approach and the outside the classroom individual digital-based approach were more effective in helping students to perform better, thus partially supporting the alternative hypothesis. The study contributed for the progress of the state of the art by drawing our attention to the plethora of phenomena around the use of computer-based technologies in education, in particular, highlighting the need to consider carefully the resources and pedagogical strategies underpinning one-to-one computing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Collins, A., Halverson, R.: The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26(1), 18–27 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tolani-Brown, N., McCormac, M., Zimmermann, R.: An analysis of the research and impact of ICT in education in developing country contexts. J. Edu. Int. Dev. 4(2), 79–90 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, S.: From VLEs to learning webs: the implications of Web 2.0 for learning and teaching. Interact. Learn. Environ. 18(1), 1–10 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chatti, M.A., Jarke, A., Jarke, M., Specht, M., Maillet, K.: PLEM: a web 2.0 driven long tail aggregator and filter for e-learning. Int. J. Web Inf. Syst. 6(1), 5–23 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Helsper, E.J., Eynon, R.: Digital natives: where is the evidence? Br. Edu. Res. J. 36(3), 503–520 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jonassen, D.H.: Computadores, Ferramentas Cognitivas: desenvolver o pensamento crítico nas escolas [Computers, Cogntive Tools: Developing Critical Thinking in Schools]. Porto Editora, Porto (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W.R., Veen, J.T.: The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Comput. Educ. 58, 136–153 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zacharia, Z.C.: The impact of interactive computer simulations on the nature and quality of postgraduate science teachers’ explanations in physics. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 27(14), 1741–1767 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bajzek, D., Burnette, J., Brown, W.: Building cognitively informed simulators utilizing multiple, linked representations which explain core concepts in modern biology. In: Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 3773–3778 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Singer, S.R., Hilton, M.L., Schweingruber, H.A.: America’s Lab Report: INVESTIGATIONS in High School Science. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khan, S.: New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 20(3), 215–232 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olympiou, G., Zacharias, Z., de Jong, T.: Making the invisivel visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation. Instr. Sci. 41, 575–596 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Halim, N.A., Ali, M., Yahaya, N., Haruzuan, M.: Mental model in learning chemical bonding: a preliminary study. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 97, 224–228 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dumon, A., MzoughiKhadhraoui, I.: Teaching chemical change modeling to Tunisian students: an “expanded chemistry triplet” for analyzing teachers’ discourse. Chem. Edu. Res. Pract. 15(1), 70 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Jong, O., Taber, K.S.: The many faces of high school chemistry. In: Learderman, N. (ed.) Handbook of Research in Science Education, vol. 2, pp. 457–480. Routledge, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shin, N., Jonassen, D.H., McGee, S.: Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40(1), 6–33 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sokolowski, A.: Teaching the photoelectric effect inductively. Phys. Educ. 48(1), 35–41 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarıa, U., Hassanb, A., Güvena, K., Şena, O.: Effects of the 5E teaching model using interactive simulation on achievement and attitude in physics education. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Math. Edu. 25(3), 20–35 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S.: Use of web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: the search for evidence-based practice. Edu. Res. Rev. 9, 47–64 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paiva, J.C., Costa, L.: Exploration guides as a strategy to improve the effectiveness of educational software in chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 87(6), 589–591 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–19. Elsevier, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cicconi, M.: Vygotsky meets technology: a reinvention of collaboration in the early childhood mathematics classroom. Early Child. Educ. J. 42(1), 57–65 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper, H., Robinson, J., Patall, E.: Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Rev. Edu. Res. 76(1), 1–62 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmerman, B.J., Kitsantas, A.: Homework practices and academic achievement: the mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 30, 397–417 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morais, C.: Produção, implmentação e avaliação de recursos educativos digitais para o ensino da química no 3.º ciclo do ensino básico [Production, Implementation and assessment of digital education resources for Chemistry teaching at the Secondary level]. Ph.D., dissertation. Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paiva, J.C., Morais, C., Moreira, L.: Multimédia no ensino das ciências: cinco anos de investigação e ensino em Portugal [Multimedia in Science Teaching: Five Years of Research and Teaching in Portugal]. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, Lisboa (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paiva, J.C., Morais, C., Moreira, L.: Multimedia in science teaching: pedagogical designs and research options in the Portuguese education between 2010–2014. In: Chova, L.G., Martínez, A.L., Torres, I.C. (eds.) Proceedings of EDULEARN16 Conference, pp. 7690–7698. IATED, Barcelona (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L.: The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 39(5), 775–786 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wallace, R.M.: A framework for understanding teaching with the internet. Am. Educ. Res. J. 41(2), 447–488 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kolikant, Y.B.-D.: Using ICT for school purposes: is there a student school disconnect? Comput. Educ. 59, 907–914 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mota, J., Morais, C., Paiva, J.C., Moreira, L.: mSciences: an affinity space for science teacher. Eur. J. Contemp. Edu. 6(3), 401–413 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boon, M., Knuuttila, T.: Models as epistemic tools in engineering sciences: a pragmatic approach. In: Meijers, A. (ed.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. 9, pp. 687–720. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Luciano Moreira is supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Grant PD/BD/114152/2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla Morais .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Morais, C., Paiva, J.C., Moreira, L. (2019). Learning Effects of Different Digital-Based Approaches in Chemistry: A Quasi-experimental Assessment. In: Tsitouridou, M., A. Diniz, J., Mikropoulos, T. (eds) Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education. TECH-EDU 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 993. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20953-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20954-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics