Abstract
Academic performance is typically measured through assessments on standardised tests. However, considerably less is known about the relationship between students self-assessment (metacognition and affective states) captured during the reading process and their academic performance. This paper presents a preliminary analysis of data gathered during a blended course offering using student self-reports on learning material as predictor of their academic outcomes. The results point to the predictive potential of such self-reports and the potentially critical role of incorporating such student self-reports in learner modelling and for driving teaching interventions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agrawal, A., Venkatraman, J., Leonard, S., Paepcke, A.: YouEDU: addressing confusion in MOOC discussion forums by recommending instructional video clips. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2015)
Behler, A.: E-readers in action. Am. Libr. 40(10), 56–59 (2009)
Black, P., Wiliam, D.: Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 92(1), 81–90 (2010)
Dixson, D.D., Worrell, F.C.: Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Pract. 55(2), 153–159 (2016)
Dolin, J., Black, P., Harlen, W., Tiberghien, A.: Exploring relations between formative and summative assessment. In: Dolin, J., Evans, R. (eds.) Transforming Assessment. CSER, vol. 4, pp. 53–80. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_3
Hypothesis: Hypothesis - the internet, peer reviewed (2018). https://web.hypothes.is/
Pellet, J.-P., Parriaux, G., Overney, T.: A case study on the effect of using an anchored-discussion forum in a programming course. In: Pozdniakov, S.N., Dagienė, V. (eds.) ISSEP 2018. LNCS, vol. 11169, pp. 42–54. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02750-6_4
Porayska-Pomsta, K., Mavrikis, M., Cukurova, M., Margeti, M., Samani, T.: Leveraging non-cognitive student self-reports to predict learning outcomes. In: Penstein Rosé, C. (ed.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 458–462. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_86
Singh, S., Meyer, B.: Using social annotations to augment the learning space and learner experience. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM (2019)
Thayer, A., Lee, C.P., Hwang, L.H., Sales, H., Sen, P., Dalal, N.: The imposition and superimposition of digital reading technology: the academic potential of e-readers. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2917–2926. ACM (2011)
Yang, D., Wen, M., Howley, I., Kraut, R., Rose, C.: Exploring the effect of confusion in discussion forums of massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ scale, pp. 121–130. ACM (2015)
Young, J.R.: 6 lessons one campus learned about e-textbooks. Chronicle High. Educ. 55(39) (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singh, S. (2019). Leveraging Student Self-reports to Predict Learning Outcomes. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_73
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_73
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23206-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23207-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)