Skip to main content

A Risk Assessment Approach Using Both Stochastic Data and Subjective Judgments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making (INFUS 2019)

Abstract

Risk assessment describes the overall process regarding identifying hazards and risk factors that have the potential to cause harm, analyzing and evaluating the risk associated with that hazard and determining appropriate ways to eliminate the hazard or control the risk. In the literature, lots of approaches are proposed to prioritize hazards and associated risks quantitatively. Fuzzy sets-based multi-criteria decision-making approaches are forefront that they have the ability in expressing the risks verbally based on decision-maker’s opinions and judgments. MCDA-based risk assessment approaches explain different types of uncertainties, which are generally modeled using stochastic analysis or fuzzy sets. The stochastic analysis is more suitable in modelling the probabilistic uncertainty. Therefore, in this study, a risk assessment approach using both stochastic data and subjective judgments is proposed, and a case study is also performed in a construction project. The VIKOR method is extended and a new risk assessment approach is developed where part of the data is stochastic. A three-year data is used to determine a fitted probability distribution of respected frequency. Evaluation of risks with respect to severity and probability parameters are then made by subjective judgments. In conclusion, a risk prioritization and potential action plan suggestion is performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Occupational_safety_and_health_risk_assessment_methodologies#Risk_management. Last Accessed 2019/11/02

  2. Gul, M.: A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J. 24(7), 1723–1760 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tavana, M., Mavi, R.K., Santos-Arteaga, F.J., Doust, E.R.: An extended VIKOR method using stochastic data and subjective judgments. Comput. & Ind. Eng. 97, 240–247 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Celik, E., Gul, M., Yucesan, M., Mete, S.: Stochastic multi criteria decision making: an overview to methods and applications. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. In press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Opricovic, S.: Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Fac. Civ. Engineering. Belgrade 2(1), 5–21 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cobuloglu, H.I., Büyüktahtakın, İ.E.: A stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable biomass crop selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(15), 6065–6074 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erdogan, M., Kaya, I.: Prioritizing failures by using hybrid multi criteria decision making methodology with a real case application. Sustain. Cities Soc. 45, 117–130 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Emeç, Ş., Akkaya, G.: Stochastic AHP and fuzzy VIKOR approach for warehouse location selection problem. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 31(6), 950–962 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data. J. Intell. & Fuzzy Syst. 33(3), 1627–1638 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, H., Li, N.: Performance evaluation for sustainability of strong smart grid by using stochastic AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Sustainability 8(2), 129 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gul, M., Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A.T., Guneri, A.F.: A state-of-the-art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl. Soft Comput. 46, 60–89 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., Gold, S.: Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195, 106–117 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sennaroglu, B., Celebi, G.V.: A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 59, 160–173 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, T.Y.: Remoteness index-based Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR methods with a generalized distance measure for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf. Fusion 41, 129–150 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gul, M.: Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: The case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. Inpress, 1–26 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gul, M., Ak, M.F.: A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 196, 653–664 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mete, S.: Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J., 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1546115

  18. Gul, M., Guven, B., Guneri, A.F.: A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 53, 3–16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suleyman Mete .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mete, S., Oz, N.E., Gul, M., Serin, F., Celik, E. (2020). A Risk Assessment Approach Using Both Stochastic Data and Subjective Judgments. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Tolga, A., Sari, I. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making. INFUS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_130

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics