Skip to main content

Improvement of Differential Fault Attack Based on Lightweight Ciphers with GFN Structure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Security (ICAIS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 11633))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on differential fault attack on lightweight block ciphers with GFN (Generalized Feistel Networks) structure. With regard to fault injection model and differential equations solving, two improved DFA (Differential Fault Analysis) methods are proposed. Based on this, we present the improved attack process which aims at applying lightweight block ciphers with GFN structure. We conduct 10000 DFA experiments on TWINE and LBlock. Result shows that it only takes 9.18 and 8.42 faults on average to recover the main key K respectively. Moreover, time and space complexity are both negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wu, W., Zhang, L.: LBlock: a lightweight block cipher. In: Lopez, J., Tsudik, G. (eds.) ACNS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6715, pp. 327–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21554-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Shibutani, K., Isobe, T., Hiwatari, H., Mitsuda, A., Akishita, T., Shirai, T.: Piccolo: an ultra-lightweight blockcipher. In: Preneel, B., Takagi, T. (eds.) CHES 2011. LNCS, vol. 6917, pp. 342–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23951-9_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo, J., Peyrin, T., Poschmann, A., Robshaw, M.: The LED block cipher. In: Preneel, B., Takagi, T. (eds.) CHES 2011. LNCS, vol. 6917, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23951-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bogdanov, A., et al.: PRESENT: an ultra-lightweight block cipher. In: Paillier, P., Verbauwhede, I. (eds.) CHES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4727, pp. 450–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74735-2_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Boneh, D., DeMillo, R.A., Lipton, R.J.: On the importance of checking cryptographic protocols for faults. In: Fumy, W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1233, pp. 37–51. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69053-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Biham, E., Shamir, A.: Differential fault analysis of secret key cryptosystems. In: Kaliski, B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 513–525. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052259

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, L., Wu, W.: Differential fault analysis on SMS4. Chin. J. Comput. 29(9), 1596–1602 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, P., Wang, X., Chaudhry, S.R., Javeed, K., Ma, Y., Collier, M.: Secure video streaming with lightweight cipher PRESENT in an SDN testbed. CMC: Comput. Mater. Continua 57(3), 353–363 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paar, C., Eisenbarth, T., Kasper, M., Kasper, T., Moradi, A.: KeeLoq and side-channel analysis-evolution of an attack. In: Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography, pp. 65–69. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, W., Gu, D., Li, J., Liu, Z., Liu, Y.: Differential fault analysis on Camellia. J. Syst. Softw. 83(5), 844–851 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, S., Yang, X., Zhong, W., Sun, Y.: A highly effective DPA attack method based on genetic algorithm. CMC: Comput. Mater. Continua 56(2), 325–338 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. FIPS PUB: Data Encryption Standard (DES). FIPS PUB 46-3 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Le Bouder, H., Thomas, G., Linge, Y., Tria, A.: On fault injections in generalized Feistel networks. In: Fault Diagnosis and Tolerance in Cryptography, pp. 83–93. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng, Y., Matsumoto, T., Imai, H.: On the construction of block ciphers provably secure and not relying on any unproved hypotheses. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 461–480. Springer, New York (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34805-0_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneier, B., Kelsey, J.: Unbalanced Feistel networks and block cipher design. In: Gollmann, D. (ed.) FSE 1996. LNCS, vol. 1039, pp. 121–144. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60865-6_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Carlet, C.: Vectorial Boolean functions for cryptography. Boolean Models Methods Math. Comput. Sci. Eng. 134, 398–469 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chabaud, F., Vaudenay, S.: Links between differential and linear cryptanalysis. In: De Santis, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1994. LNCS, vol. 950, pp. 356–365. Springer, Heidelberg (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053450

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, P., Wei, Y., Pan, X.: Differential fault attack on TWINE. Appl. Res. Comput. 32(6), 1796–1800 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jia, P., Xu, H., Qi, W.: Research on cryptographic properties of lightweight S-boxes. J. Cryptol. Res. 2(6), 497–504 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Wang, T.: Improvement differential fault attack on TWINE. J. Commun. 38(Z2), 178–184 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Yuan, Q., Wang, T., Wang, X., Guo, L.: Methods of differential fault attack on LBlock with analysis of probability. In: Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, W., Zhang, W., Gu, D.: Security analysis of the lightweight cryptosystem TWINE in the Internet of Things. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 9(2), 793–810 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeong, K., Lee, C., Lim, J.: Improved differential fault analysis on lightweight block cipher LBlock for wireless sensor networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Network. 2013(1), 151 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao, S., Chen, H., Fan, L., Wu, W.: Improved fault attack on LBlock: earlier injection with no extra faults. Chin. J. Electron. 26(4), 754–759 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei, Y., Rong, Y., Wang, X.: New differential fault attack on lightweight cipher LBlock. In: International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, pp. 285–288. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongjuan Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Yuan, Q., Wang, T., Wang, X. (2019). Improvement of Differential Fault Attack Based on Lightweight Ciphers with GFN Structure. In: Sun, X., Pan, Z., Bertino, E. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Security. ICAIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11633. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24265-7_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24265-7_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24264-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24265-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics